Sunday, October 13, 2024
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries
You are viewing: Home > Columns > Phillip Tilley > Column article
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
Phillip Tilley

Taxes bloody taxes

February 21, 2008 | Comment icon 20 comments
Image Credit: sxc.hu
Why didn’t Sherlock Holmes have to pay any taxes? Because he had some brilliant deductions. OK, none of us are Sherlock Holmes. It’s that time of year again we all love to hate, when we come to realize there really are only two sure things in life, “debt and taxes”! Some people believe we do not owe the income tax. Red Beckman in his book, “The Law That Never Was”, shows strong evidence the 16th Amendment was never ratified by the necessary majority of states to become law. I was a witness as IRS agents seized his property and drove a bull dozer through his house. No, I am not making that up. The property was then sold to a developer. Recently Ed and Elaine Brown were sent to prison for not paying income taxes. They also believed the income tax to be illegal. Why would they think that? Probably because the U.S. Constitution Article I section 9 clause 4, forbids any direct tax, (the income tax is a direct tax) unless it is apportioned. From 1894-1912 six attempts were made to pass an income tax law and six times the U.S. Supreme Court found them to be unconstitutional. So why do we have an income tax now?

The income tax law was passed by Congress in 1913. The Federal Reserve Act was also passed in 1913. I do not believe in coincidences. It was all part of the clever and sinister conspiracy to create the money matrix. During WWII the government instituted the “Victory Tax”, a withholding of 5% of workers earnings. This was an unlawful tax, but during a time of war no patriotic American would challenge it. Congress repealed the Victory Tax in 1944. In 1943 that same Congress passed the “Tax Payment Act” which is the current method of the government withholding our earnings as an income tax. Although an income tax is unconstitutional, Article 1, sub section 2, clause 3 of the Constitution, the government said the 16th Amendment made it legal. So, is it legal?

Two taxes that are legal are tariffs and excise taxes. Tariffs are taxes on imported goods and are paid to us by other countries. Excise taxes are use taxes like the gas tax that pays for the use and maintenance of our highways. It may surprise you that all the funding to run the country comes from tariffs and excise taxes. So what does the income tax pay for? The interest on the so called national debt, which is paid to private bankers, some of which are not owned by U.S. citizens. No country that pays tribute can continue to prosper.
As to the question of whether the income tax is legal or not, I would say not if we had real money, but of course we don’t. What income is taxed? Federal Reserve Note currency income, and the Federal Reserve Notes are private currency and are not money. You are being taxed for the use of a private currency, which in reality makes the income tax an excise tax.

There is no money, so the tax for the use of a privately issued currency is perfectly legal. Very clever and very sinister and very much a conspiracy. If we had real money it would be a crime. Wake up people, the money matrix has you.

Phillip Tilley is the author of The Money Matrix of the New World Order and other articles. Comments (20)


<< Previous story
Wartime psychics
Next story >>
The end times rituals
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #11 Posted by Oen Anderson 17 years ago
What does this continous blogging concerning money and taxes have to do with the theme of this website? Maybe it doesn't concern you that you are a slave to a system that pervades every aspect of our lives. You can't give an example where money and taxes arn't involved! Not to mention that the money matrix is probably the conspiracy that links many of the other conspiracys togather. Also did you know that blog spelled backward is "Golb" which is very similar to "Gold" except is has fewer calories and is less filling.
Comment icon #12 Posted by SoCrazes 17 years ago
Well the USA get tax for black orperations some wear. The amount dished out by the US for military is stupid. They've dished out millions and billions on concepts alone that were never designed. If you were to add up all this money I'd say you could end world hunger and every other problem while your at it. The best thing about money is that you can see are doing with it. It's like a representation of our daily doings. At the moment all I see is a lot of killing. We spent a lot of money on killing people. Money doesn't evene exist anyway. So all we are doing is killing people. The money system... [More]
Comment icon #13 Posted by SoCrazes 17 years ago
Maybe it doesn't concern you that you are a slave to a system that pervades every aspect of our lives. You can't give an example where money and taxes arn't involved! Not to mention that the money matrix is probably the conspiracy that links many of the other conspiracys togather. Also did you know that blog spelled backward is "Golb" which is very similar to "Gold" except is has fewer calories and is less filling. Econ 101 - The three factors of production are land, labor (human work), and capital (things you use in the production of goods and services-money). All three factors of production ... [More]
Comment icon #14 Posted by Oen Anderson 17 years ago
Econ 101 - The three factors of production are land, labor (human work), and capital (things you use in the production of goods and services-money). All three factors of production are needed for any business in any economic system. Is it possible to control all, or any, of these factors in a global fashion? If so, how would you go about garnering control? "Money Matrix of the New World Order" pg 155. "(Frederick Soddy believed that wealth is a physical phenomenon, and debt is a mathematical phenomenon. From his scientific view of the production process, Soddy replaced Adam Smith's traditional... [More]
Comment icon #15 Posted by Oen Anderson 17 years ago
Many see money or currency as stored units of work. The more you have the less work you have to do to maintain the same standard of living...providing inflation doesn't consume your "stored units of work" - the perception of the value of that currency/money is maintained. Another way people may look at money/currency is that the more you have, the higher standard of living you can ascribe to. Money/currency in itself is useless; however, if one perceives value in trading work/assets/etc. for that money or currency, then that currency/money has value. Oil, Greed, and the New Global Economy are ... [More]
Comment icon #16 Posted by Startraveler 17 years ago
Although an income tax is unconstitutional, Article 1, sub section 2, clause 3 of the Constitution, the government said the 16th Amendment made it legal. So, is it legal? . . . As to the question of whether the income tax is legal or not, I would say not if we had real money. . . I feel this author is somewhat confused as to what a constitutional amendment is. And I suppose other things as well.
Comment icon #17 Posted by REBEL 17 years ago
Before Tax: After Tax:
Comment icon #18 Posted by SoCrazes 17 years ago
I feel this author is somewhat confused as to what a constitutional amendment is. And I suppose other things as well. Any additions or changes to the U.S. Constitution must be done through amendments (there are currently 27 amendments). Amendments are very difficult to pass. The following was cut and pasted from Wikpedia on the 16th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution: The Sixteenth Amendment (Amendment XVI) of the United States Constitution was ratified on February 3, 1913. This Amendment overruled Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. (1895), which greatly limited the Congress's authority ... [More]
Comment icon #19 Posted by SoCrazes 17 years ago
"Money Matrix of the New World Order" pg 155. "(Frederick Soddy believed that wealth is a physical phenomenon, and debt is a mathematical phenomenon. From his scientific view of the production process, Soddy replaced Adam Smith's traditional factors of production, 'Land, Labor, and Capitol,' with 'Discovery, Natural Energy, and Human Diligence.' He believed that before you could create wealth, you have to first discover the means to make your efforts valuable.)" Since our capital is actually debt currency, a negative thing, we do not have the third item necessary in the three factors of tradit... [More]
Comment icon #20 Posted by The Old Medic 16 years ago
You really have no grasp of economics at all. Instead, you have political beliefs, and you intrepret virtually everything based upon those political beliefs. You are correct in one sense. The value of any form of money is whatever that society places on it. Conch shells, gold coins, pretty beads, fancy engraved slips of paper; they all have the same value - whatever society believes them to be worth. As to taxes, well thare is a very simple way to make certain that tax rates remain very low. Just convince people to take responsibility for themselves and not to depend upon government to do ever... [More]


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


 Total Posts: 7,701,488    Topics: 321,161    Members: 202,562

 Not a member yet ? Click here to join - registration is free and only takes a moment!
Recent news and articles