Friday, May 2, 2025
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries Support Us
You are viewing: Home > Columns > Matt Haas > Column article
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
Matt Haas

Money, money, money...

June 24, 2008 | Comment icon 9 comments
Image Credit: sxc.hu
There is a question that has been brought up a lot in the paranormal field. Should investigators or business establishments be charging for paranormal investigations? It all depends. I've always believed in doing the right thing. I do not agree with investigators charging clients for investigations. I also do not think that business establishments should be charging the fellow paranormal investigator a fee for investigating, especially since investigators are the ones who proclaim or deem their establishments to be haunted in the first place. If you are going to charge anyone any kind of fee, charge people outside the paranormal field. Remember our field is strictly for scientific purposes and volunteer only. It just seems like every type of historical business is eating it up or taking advantage of it. There's nothing wrong with them trying to improve their business. They will do what it takes to survive and make an income just as much as the next guy.

Perhaps they should rephrase how they word charging people. State it as a donation rather than a fee. It would be nice to know where our money is going? Is it going towards renovations or keeping the place up? Is it for charity? If our money is going for a good cause, then I think its ok to charge. But charge a smaller fee to a fellow paranormal investigator. I think that is fair and reasonable. With everything becoming so costly it helps us out a great deal. Besides, you do not see scientists charging people do you?

Everything is becoming so expensive in certain regions of the country as I stated in my last article such as gas, oil, and traveling costs. If there was a deal or negotiation we could make with haunted establishments, it wouldn't be so bad. You have a lot of thrill seekers but then you have those who truly study and research ghostly phenomenon. I don't think its asking a lot of those establishments to be fair with the fellow investigator who is just there to scientifically try and prove paranormal events.
In all honesty who do you think started all of this? Please do not get me wrong when I say that I believe TAPS had a great deal in getting these historical business establishments into turning this into a money making business. It just seems like every big establishment they investigate turns around and is making money off of their haunting with t-shirts, posters, ghost tours, appearances with Ghost Hunters and so forth.

They also charge astronomical amounts of money for it. I'm a huge fan of Ghost Hunters. I enjoy what they do. I also have a ton of respect for them. They have done a lot for our field in a short span of time. But at the same time, the establishments who are making money out of it hurts the smaller research groups who are in this for the science end of things.

If you have a way to study & research such establishments without having them charge a fee to you, please share how you do it. As time goes on, things aren't going to get better with expenses. They are just going to get worse. Unless you have an excellent paying job. Like the old saying...

Money Talks and B.S. Walks! Comments (9)


Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #1 Posted by MasterPo 17 years ago
Perhaps they should rephrase how they word charging people. State it as a donation rather than a fee. Do you suggest what the "donation" should be? Or let the client give whatever they feel like? If someone offers to "donate" a large sum of money do you put them at the head of the line in terms of priorities? Should you request the "donation" before or after the investigation? Should you request the "donation" before or after revealing the results of your investigation? Should you give back the "donation" if the results of the investigation aren't to the client's liking? Even calling it a "don... [More]
Comment icon #2 Posted by Incorrigible1 17 years ago
Even calling it a "donation" isn't clear cut. If it looks like a snake and sounds like a snake and walks like a snake.... I've always been impressed with the considerable man-hours involved in a serious investigation. I can understand hobbyists/devotees offering their services free of charge, but if the service has been requested, then what might be the time you devote to the investigation be worth? Especially the boring, nodding-off hours devoted to listening for EVPs and video monitoring. Agreed, most hobbyists perform the service free of charge. But one must admit there are some damn boring... [More]
Comment icon #3 Posted by Pluto-x 17 years ago
All I'm saying is that I don't think its fair of these "haunted" establishments to charge the fellow investigator who were the ones who deemed their location haunted to begin with. Yes, they already asked for help and all. But there are teams out there who have a right to go to such places that claim to be haunted and study it for the gain of science without having to be charged an astronomical amounts of money for it. Or at least tell me where all that money is going and I might feel better paying so much. I mean think about it... You have to add fuel costs which all Long Islander's know is s... [More]
Comment icon #4 Posted by ROGER 17 years ago
Besides, you do not see scientists charging people do you? Actually yes, Scientist charge large amounts of money for their Expertize and equipment and materials. Run a DNA check and see how much it costs.
Comment icon #5 Posted by MasterPo 17 years ago
I agree about the fuel costs. Not sure what we can do about it though. If you're complaint is that more and more places are charging investigators to be there, the paranormal has become big business to many. I've written about that many times here and other forums. I grant there are costs to keeping a facility open for the public. But when you compute how much various places taken in weekly in investigation fees vs. estimated costs of operation IMO someone is making a sweet penny on all this!
Comment icon #6 Posted by Oen Anderson 17 years ago
There is no money.
Comment icon #7 Posted by LIGhostChick 17 years ago
Some of these places are hundreds of years old so they money they make is to cover restoration fees, maintenance, staff, taxes etc. I agree that some places do go way over-board charging to investigate, it suck because the majority of the serious groups are non-profit so every expense comes out of everyone's pockets.
Comment icon #8 Posted by MasterPo 17 years ago
I misunderstood the point of this article, hence my first post. I agree to the extent as I outlined in my second comment. Now if a place asks specifically for a group to come and then wants to charge them for it that would be outrageous! ps- What is "reverse infrared"?
Comment icon #9 Posted by ProInvest 17 years ago
To say the least I do not think that you fully understand the fee usage or why you pay it. If you ask they will tell you why or what your money paid will go for. I think that you balk at the simplest request for compensation for use of a facility. If you go to a golf course is it free? Why not? Your bringing your clubs and your own tee's? So why pay? Well it is nice to have the grass cut and the greens properly manicured (cut and sloped properly with a hole and pin). Better yet imagine going to play hockey on the ice. Well imagine there were three or four persons sleeping on the net. Think wha... [More]


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


 Total Posts: 7,752,834    Topics: 324,106    Members: 203,523

 Not a member yet ? Click here to join - registration is free and only takes a moment!
Recent news and articles