Wednesday, April 30, 2025
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries Support Us
You are viewing: Home > News > Science & Technology > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All ▾
Search Submit

Science & Technology

'Ethical' robot makes deadly decisions

By T.K. Randall
September 21, 2014 · Comment icon 17 comments

Isaac Asimov suggested that robots should be given ethical constraints. Image Credit: IEEE Spectrum
A robot programmed to save people from an imminent threat turned out to be worryingly indecisive.
Researchers at Bristol University set up an experiment in which a robot was programmed specifically with the task of preventing other robots from falling down a hole.

The concept was based on exploring robot ethics as outlined by author Isaac Asimov who suggested that robots be governed by a set of moral principles requiring them to prevent any human from coming to harm as a direct result of their own inaction.
When the research team ran the experiment they found that the robot tasked with saving the other robots only managed to do so around half the time. The problem seemed to stem from the fact that when two robots needed to be rescued at the same time, the robot doing the rescuing dithered around too long trying to figure out who to help, ultimately resulting in both falling down the hole.

"It notices one human robot, starts toward it but then almost immediately notices the other," said roboticist Alan Winfield. "It changes its mind. And the time lost dithering means the Asimov robot cannot prevent either robot from falling into the hole."

The experiment mirrors concerns raised about the decision making of self-driving cars which will be required to keep both their own passengers and other road users safe from harm.

Source: Yahoo! News | Comments (17)




Other news and articles
Our latest videos Visit us on YouTube
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #8 Posted by taniwha 11 years ago
A dalek is actually the critter inside a trashcan shaped tank. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NlpRBLkgcBo This does not fill me with confidence about robots making decisions and those google cars that are being worked on. This is interesting, "...In 1968 chess master David Levy made a bet that by 1978 no computer could beat him in a series of games. He won the bet. In fact, it took most of the 1980s before he was finally beaten. "After I won the first bout, I made a second bet for a period of five years. I stopped betting after that. At that point I could see what was coming." In 1997, the bes... [More]
Comment icon #9 Posted by DieChecker 11 years ago
Note the little guy sitting up top. Robots seem good at winning. It might be more realistic to expect robots perform better calculations when it comes to self preservation. If they were programmed to save humans pending their own self destruction, maybe they might be 'forced' to become more ethical?Just a thought. One thought I have is that people don't use a powerful desk top today. They use their cell phone as their internet connection. The same will apply to robots, in my opinion. People will not want the totally safe, logical, powerful home unit on wheels, they are going to want the smal... [More]
Comment icon #10 Posted by Ashyne 11 years ago
The same thing happens with humans too. The robot is merely mimicking what a real human would do. If a father has a choice to save either one of his two twin sons, he would hesitate and may fail to save both. This indecisiveness is what makes us human. If the robot displays the same kind of indecisiveness, thus mimicking actual human behavior, can we say that the robot has finally achieved correct representation of human behavior rather than strict, controlled and unwavering artificially-programmed behavior and hence come one step closer to being humanlike?
Comment icon #11 Posted by taniwha 11 years ago
Note the little guy sitting up top. Yes you are right! Its a Cyborg! If it bleeds it can die! Exterrrrminate!! Exterrrrminate!! One thought I have is that people don't use a powerful desk top today. They use their cell phone as their internet connection. The same will apply to robots, in my opinion. People will not want the totally safe, logical, powerful home unit on wheels, they are going to want the small flying robot companion, that has limited memory and limited processing ability, to keep it small. So robotics better get the "morality" of robots down to where even the stupidest robot is ... [More]
Comment icon #12 Posted by taniwha 11 years ago
The same thing happens with humans too. The robot is merely mimicking what a real human would do. If a father has a choice to save either one of his two twin sons, he would hesitate and may fail to save both. This indecisiveness is what makes us human. If the robot displays the same kind of indecisiveness, thus mimicking actual human behavior, can we say that the robot has finally achieved correct representation of human behavior rather than strict, controlled and unwavering artificially-programmed behavior and hence come one step closer to being humanlike? Good points Ashyne, but its doubtful... [More]
Comment icon #13 Posted by MJNYC 11 years ago
They need code in the ethics from IRobot, since that AI could determine who to save based on probability of survival.
Comment icon #14 Posted by paperdyer 11 years ago
They need code in the ethics from IRobot, since that AI could determine who to save based on probability of survival. I thought all the Robots were programmed that way. Isn't that why Wil Smith's character disliked robots because one saved him over a little girl based on the determination of the survival probability of both?
Comment icon #15 Posted by Whisperer 11 years ago
Just stupid programming is all, they need to input "Save nearest", "Save most likely to fall first", "Save Both" or "Help them over", after all, its all down to the programming algorithm isnt it...or give them more scenarios to encourage faster decision making outcomes...
Comment icon #16 Posted by Wickian 11 years ago
All this means is don't put your life or safety in the hands of an automated decision making machine. There's a reason all commercial aircraft and automobiles must be able to operated in a completely analogue way without any computed assistance in the case of an emergency.
Comment icon #17 Posted by nothinglizx2 11 years ago
A+D=P of (-rR) Area+Distance from hole=Probability of survival of (negative results robot) If one is trying to save the other, then the other should be trying to save the one without a rescuer, if able to.


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Recent news and articles