Wednesday, January 17, 2018
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help   RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos
Find: in

Could floating wind farms power the planet ?


Posted on Tuesday, 10 October, 2017 | Comment icon 23 comments

Is this the future of electricity generation ? Image Credit: CC BY-SA 3.0 Kim Hansen
Scientists believe that wind farms in the North Atlantic could provide enough electricity to power the world.
Floating wind farms could one day help to provide the majority of the world's power, that is, at least, according to a new paper published this week which claims that ocean-based wind farms are capable of producing three times as much electricity as land-based sites.

Until now, wind turbines placed at sea have had to be anchored to the sea floor, but with the advent of floating turbines it will become possible to place much larger wind farms further away from the shore.

One of the plans considered for the study describes a wind farm covering 70,000 sq km of the North Atlantic with the capacity to power the entire United States for ten months of the year.

Set up enough such sites, scientists argue, and it may even be possible to power the whole world.

The first ever floating wind farm, which is known as Hywind, is currently being constructed off the coast of Scotland and is set to begin commercial production before the end of the year.

Capable of generating electricity for 20,000 households, the project, if successful, could pave the way for much larger floating wind farms in the future and offer a means with which to replace conventional fossil-fuel based power plants with renewable energy on a much wider scale.

"This is an industry in its birth stage," said study co-author Ken Caldeira. "It really does look like the open-ocean environment can sustain a lot more power generation than on land."

"But making these technologies cheap enough to compete will be challenging."

Source: Seeker.com | Comments (23)

Tags: Wind Farms

Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #14 Posted by toast on 11 October, 2017, 15:52
You are telling, again, utter nonsense. First, there are no solutions to ship nuclear waste to the Moon; 2nd, nobody would accept the very high costs and 3rd, nobody would accept the high risk of nuclear pollution of the Earth in case of carrier failure. Nuclear power plants are in service for nearly 70 years now, dont you wonder why we still not have such deep located storage sites?
Comment icon #15 Posted by qxcontinuum on 12 October, 2017, 2:50
1 - Nasa is sending nuclear powered probes to space since 70's . Active plutonium is muchmore dangerous in smaller quantities than atomic waste. The actual cost of storing waste in third world countries or buried deep under tons of mountain rock , including lead cover layers and such would be 3 times more expansive than paying Russia to fly it in space. 2 - deep forage isn't possible yet since there was little interest in developing equipment to do it although curently there has been successful attempts to drill deeper and deeper
Comment icon #16 Posted by Noteverythingisaconspiracy on 12 October, 2017, 11:51
The RTG's on NASA spacecrafts countains at most 8 kg of plutonium. Currently we produce around 12.000 tons of high-level nuclear wate per year,this is the equivelant of 1,5 million RTG's. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radioisotope_thermoelectric_generator I don't know what it would cost to store waste in 3rd world countries, but do you really think it is a good idea to send material usefull for nuclear weapons and dirty bombs to 3rd world countries ? This we can actually do some math on. Assuming we use the Proton rocket we can currently send about 20 tons into orbit at a cost of 65 million $... [More]
Comment icon #17 Posted by toast on 12 October, 2017, 14:49
Noteverythingisaconspiracy was a little faster than me here and he gave you exactly the answer I would had given. But I would like to ask you, as you used the wording "active plutonium", are you in the opinion that there is "inactive plutonium" as well?
Comment icon #18 Posted by qxcontinuum on 13 October, 2017, 5:13
well, plutonium is an active element with a half life of approx. 24,000 years. So yeah it decays in time, i don't see why my statement is incorrect !
Comment icon #19 Posted by DieChecker on 13 October, 2017, 12:13
I kind of like this idea of floating wind farms. There's got to be a better way then dangling cables down to the sea floor. Perhaps convert oil tankers to store electrical charge, and then have them bring it back to shore? Or, perhaps have the wind generators produce hydrogen in the base of the tower and then the hydrogen is tankered back to shore?
Comment icon #20 Posted by DieChecker on 13 October, 2017, 12:20
I agree. Nuclear is not the future. It is a expensive dead end. Fukushima....
Comment icon #21 Posted by Black Monk on 13 October, 2017, 12:25
It's bird-shredding (not very good for the environment) windmills that are the expensive and useless dead end. Nuclear and coal (of which the UK sits on trillions of tons) are the future. How many Fukushimas have there been? Fukushima sits on an earthquake zone. Most nuclear plants don't.
Comment icon #22 Posted by khol on 13 October, 2017, 12:44
They should hire my ex wife to stand in front of a wind farm but yeah quite sure politicians would work as well !
Comment icon #23 Posted by toast on 13 October, 2017, 16:45
The Chernobyl disaster wasnt caused by geological forces, the Windscale incidentwasnt caused by geological forces, the 2005 Sellafield incident wasnt cause bygeological forces, the Three Mile Island incidents werent caused by geological forces etc etc etc.


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


  On the forums
Forum posts:
Forum topics:
Members:

6080526
260388
172487

 
Papers found on Blackbeard's ship identified
1-16-2018
Archaeologists have found the answer to one of the Queen Anne's Revenge's most enduring mysteries.
Aztec epidemic mystery may have been solved
1-16-2018
500 years ago, a deadly epidemic known as 'cocoliztli' killed nearly 80 per cent of the Aztec population.
Could giant lasers shoot down space debris ?
1-15-2018
A new study by researchers in China has put forward a novel new way of tackling the problem of space junk.
'Ingredients for life' found in meteorites
1-15-2018
Scientists have found new evidence to suggest that life could have arisen elsewhere in the solar system.
Featured Videos
Gallery icon 
Typing vs handwriting
Posted 1-16-2018 | 2 comments
Is typing on a computer better or worse for your memory then writing on paper ?
 
Can coding help avoid job automation ?
Posted 1-12-2018 | 0 comments
Taking up coding and technical skills to avoid automation may be counter-productive.
 
Dinosaur death match
Posted 1-8-2018 | 0 comments
A look at how various dinosaurs might have fared against the predators of their day.
 
Best records of 2017
Posted 1-4-2018 | 0 comments
A look back at some of the most bizarre and amazing world records of the last year.
 
Did people really put frogs in milk ?
Posted 1-2-2018 | 0 comments
Is it true that people once put frogs in milk in order to stop it from spoiling ?
 
 View: More videos
Stories & Experiences
First college apartment
12-31-2017 | Daytona Beach, FL
 
The night my niece was murdered
12-19-2017 | Delhi, Louisiana
 
Mysterious Headlights
12-10-2017 | Morgan County, Alabama
 
Possibly a child ghost
12-10-2017 | Edgewater, Maryland
 
True story about black-eyed kids
12-10-2017 | Portland oregon
 
Alien or paranormal encounter ?
12-10-2017 | United States
 
Ouija board experience
12-10-2017 | Ohio
 
Strange occurrences
11-15-2017 | Fife
 
Mysterious music box song
11-15-2017 | U.S.A
 

         More stories | Send us your story
 
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.7 Unexplained-Mysteries.com 2001-2017
Privacy Policy and Disclaimer   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ