We are now on Patreon! Click here to learn more about how you can help support the site.

Monday, November 29, 2021
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
You are viewing: Home > News > Palaeontology > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
Palaeontology

Early humans interbred with 'ghost population'

February 13, 2020 | Comment icon 17 comments



There was another species of human that we know nothing about. Image Credit: CC BY-SA 4.0 Brett Eloff
A new study has revealed that our ancestors mated with a mysterious unknown population of ancient humans.
Writing in The Conversation, George Busby - Senior Research Fellow in Translational Genomics at the University of Oxford - describes this fascinating new discovery and what it could all mean.



One of the more startling discoveries arising from genomic sequencing of ancient hominin DNA is the realization that all humans outside Africa have traces of DNA in their genomes that do not belong to our own species.

The approximately six billion people on Earth whose recent ancestry is not from Africa will have inherited between 1% and 2% of their genome from our closest but now extinct relatives: the Neanderthals. East Asians and Oceanians have also inherited a small amount of ancestry from the Denisovans, another close relative of Homo Sapiens.

Now a new study, published in Science Advances, suggests that early humans living inside Africa may also have interbred with archaic hominims. These are extinct species that are related to Homo sapiens.

The interbreeding outside Africa happened after our Homo sapiens ancestors expanded out of Africa into new environments. It was there they had sex with Neaderthals and the related Denisovans.

This led to new discoveries. Early genetic studies of people from across the globe had previously suggested that our current distribution was the result of a single expansion out of Africa around 100,000 years ago. But the identification of Neanderthal and Denisovan ancestry in modern Eurasians complicated things.

We still think that most - anywhere between about 92% and 98.5% - of the ancestry in people not living in Africa today does indeed derive from the out-of-Africa expansion. But we now know the remainder came from archaic species whose ancestors left Africa hundreds of thousands of years before that.

What was happening inside Africa?

Insights into interbreeding have been driven by the much greater availability of modern and ancient genomes from outside of Africa. That's because the cold and dry environments of Eurasia are much better at preserving DNA that the wet heat of tropical Africa.

But our understanding of the relationship between ancient human ancestors within Africa, and their connection with archaic humans, is beginning to deepen. A 2017 study of ancient DNA from southern Africa investigated 16 ancient genomes from people alive over the last 10,000 years. This showed that the history of African populations was complex. There wasn't just a single group of humans around in Africa when they expanded out 100,000 years ago.
It's a result that was supported earlier this year by a paper examining ancient DNA from four individuals from what is now Cameroon. Taken together, this research suggests there were geographically diverse groups in Africa well before the main expansion out of the continent. And many of these groups will have contributed to the ancestry of people alive in Africa today.

In addition, it now appears that there was potentially gene-flow into ancient African Homo sapiens populations from an archaic ancestor. One way in which this could happen is for people to expand out of Africa, have sex with Neanderthals, and then migrate back into Africa. Indeed, this has been demonstrated in one recent study.

The new paper provides evidence that there may also have been gene-flow into the ancestors of West Africans directly from a mysterious archaic hominin. The researchers compared Neanderthal and Densiovan DNA with that from four contemporary populations from West Africa. Using some elegant mathematics, they then built a statistical model to explain the relationships between the archaic hominins and modern Africans.

Interestingly, they suggest that 6%-7% of the genomes of West Africans is archaic in origin. But this archaic ancestry wasn't Neanderthal or Denisovan. Their model suggested the additional ancestry came from an archaic population for which we don't currently have a genome.

This ghost population likely split from the ancestors of humans and Neanderthals between 360,000 and 1.02 million years ago. That was well before the gene-flow event that brought Neanderthal DNA back into West Africa around 43,000 years ago - although the value of this could be anywhere between 0 and 124,000 years ago.

These dates position this ghost species as something akin to a Neanderthal, but that presumably was present within Africa, during the last 100,000 years. An alternative explanation is that the archaic hominin was present outside of Africa and interbred with populations there before they migrated back in.

Despite a raft of analyses that show that this result is not an artefact of either their methodology or some other genetic process, the authors are cautious about this result. They call for further analysis of both contemporary and ancient DNA from diverse populations in Africa.

Nevertheless, this research contributes to the ever-growing cannon of research demonstrating the promiscuous, species-crossing and complicated behaviours of the ancestors of all of us.

George Busby, Senior Research Fellow in Translational Genomics, University of Oxford.

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license.

Read the original article.The Conversation

Source: The Conversation | Comments (17)



Unexplained Mysteries is now on Patreon!

Click here to learn more about how you can help support the site and gain access to a range of perks including a subscriber badge, ad-free browsing, an exclusive weekly newsletter, sneak peaks of upcoming features and more.
24 / 25  
We are 96% of the way to our second Patreon subscriber target - thank you!
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #8 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf 2 years ago
Well if you ignore the fossil record, the genetic record and the first two paragraphs of the article that might be a reasonable conclusion.
Comment icon #9 Posted by Imaginarynumber1 2 years ago
So what you're saying is that you didn't read the article 
Comment icon #10 Posted by Varelse 2 years ago
Gotta be the Anunnaki. Damn gold hoarding aliens.
Comment icon #11 Posted by qxcontinuum 2 years ago
It must have been an orgy...
Comment icon #12 Posted by openozy 2 years ago
I'll ask the hillbillies around here but I doubt the sheep would sink that low,even on a Friday night.
Comment icon #13 Posted by dlh 2 years ago
So if there are mysterious gene flows both into and out of Africa, doesn't that mean the Out of Africa Theory is all wrong?  Why not Out of Europe or Out of the Near East?
Comment icon #14 Posted by third_eye 2 years ago
Great, something else to blame China again...  ~
Comment icon #15 Posted by Imaginarynumber1 2 years ago
No. It just means that after Fully Modern Humans left Africa, they came back in successive waves and interbreed with the populations that remained behind. Our origins are 100% African. 
Comment icon #16 Posted by Imaginarynumber1 2 years ago
I mean, they've really been setting themselves up for failure the last couple years.
Comment icon #17 Posted by joc 2 years ago
Here is another article on the subject    ...and it has pictures!   A new study published shows that human DNA may have more Neanderthal in it than was previously believed. It’s well-known that Neanderthals and modern humans, Homo sapiens, have links but new research suggests that they may be more comprehensive than scientists first thought, according to Smithsonian magazine. Both species have a common ancestor who originated in Africa, but both early humans and Neanderthals split off and began to take their own evolutionary path.  Neanderthals were already well established in Asia and Europe ... [More]


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Recent news and articles