Monday, May 6, 2024
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries
You are viewing: Home > News > The UFO Phenomenon > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All ▾
Search Submit

The UFO Phenomenon

US government has downplayed its UFO knowledge, says senator

By T.K. Randall
June 25, 2023 · Comment icon 52 comments
An aerial view of the Pentagon.
Does the US government know more than it is letting on ? Image Credit: CC BY-SA 4.0 Touch Of Light
Missouri Republican Sen. Josh Hawley maintains that we are not getting the full picture with regard to UFO disclosure.
It is certainly an interesting time for UFO enthusiasts - earlier this month, whistleblower David Grusch made the startling claim that the US government had long been in possession of "intact and partially intact vehicles of non-human origin", sparking a renewed interest in full UFO disclosure.

Now Sen. Josh Hawley has weighed in on the matter by claiming that US government officials have "downplayed" the number of UFO cases that they are aware of.

"The number of these is apparently huge, huge," he told NewsNation.
"And that is something that the government has, the best I can say about it, downplayed, if not kept from the public, for a long, long time."

Hawley also maintains that there are many documented sightings of UFOs that are "unaccounted for".

"I don't have any basis to evaluate them but do some of the details that he's alleging, do they sound plausible? Yeah, sure," he said.

"They sound plausible, based on what I've seen this government do in other instances."

Source: The Messenger | Comments (52)




Other news and articles
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #43 Posted by Golden Duck 10 months ago
Nothing about the "apocryphal" 23 minute video.
Comment icon #44 Posted by Golden Duck 10 months ago
To use their words "apocryphal" material.
Comment icon #45 Posted by skyeagle409 10 months ago
That is what you think, but then again, you have yet to post man-made evidence anyway that refutes ET's evidence.
Comment icon #46 Posted by Golden Duck 10 months ago
I posted a USAF fighter pilots opinion in the leaked Navy videos.
Comment icon #47 Posted by skyeagle409 10 months ago
And I posted testimonies of Navy pilots who encountered the UAPs and stated that the objects they encountered were not of this Earth.   Navy pilot describes UFO he saw as ‘not from the Earth’ Asked what he believes it was, 13 years later, he was unequivocal. “Something not from the Earth,” he said. https://digitaledition.baltimoresun.com/tribune/article_popover.aspx?guid=be55ed84-6036-484d-b073-2f17c558aa78   And their testimonies were confirmed by radar controllers aboard the ships who tracked the UAPs in real-time via datalink. Pay attention in the video beginning at timeline: 7: ... [More]
Comment icon #48 Posted by skyeagle409 10 months ago
It is apparent that you didn't bother to review the video, which brings in Section XVIII at this link,  Daniel Drasin | Skeptical About Skeptics    
Comment icon #49 Posted by Dejarma 10 months ago
what's the difference between a debunker & a skeptic in your opinion?
Comment icon #50 Posted by skyeagle409 10 months ago
I have two relating to debunkers. A closed-minded debunker is a person dismisses all evidence despite the validity of the evidence presented, and in many cases, are just in for the fun of derailing a discussion with misinformation and disinformation. Dr. Edward Condon was a prime example of a closed-minded debunker who got caught distorting the facts. Case in point. Flying Saucer Fiasco Look Magazine, May, 14, 1968 The extraordinary story of the half-million-dollar "trick" to make Americans believe the Condon committee was conducting an objective investigation SHG - The Flying Saucer Fiasco "... [More]
Comment icon #51 Posted by Trelane 10 months ago
Most debunkers will examine and consider what "evidence" is presented. After their analysis, it is up to the individual to accept or reject it as proof of extraterrestrial cs and their craft.  Sky closes out his last post by saying, "When I posted verified radar data and did so for a particularly good reason and then read responses where atmospheric phenomenon and radar glitches were knowingly and incorrectly substituted despite the fact the evidence as presented did not depict any such thing, then I know where those folks were coming from.".  I ask again, how do you Sky know as a definitive... [More]
Comment icon #52 Posted by skyeagle409 10 months ago
I am not a person who accepts every UFO photo and claim its ET. I am an open-minded debunker in that respect who differentiates between open-minded debunkers and closed-minded debunkers. There are big differences between the two. Considering that I understand what the data depicts, should be a clue as to why I know the data does not depict anything to do with atmospheric phenomena or radar glitches. What you are revealing to me is that you do not understand what the data I have been posting is all about and let's just say that I already know the rest of the story. There are major differences b... [More]


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Top 10 trending mysteries
Recent news and articles