Grusch speaking during the hearing. Image Credit: YouTube / Guardian News
Several key witnesses made a number of startling claims at yesterday's subcommittee hearing on UFOs.
David Grusch - who previously worked with the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency and held top-level clearance at the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force - told yesterday's congressional hearing that the US government had conducted a "multi-decade" program to recover and attempt to reverse-engineer crashed UFOs (or UAPs).
Citing "extensive interviews with high-level intelligence officials", he maintained that "non-human biologics" had been found at some of these crash sites and claimed that people had been "harmed or injured" as a result of government efforts to conceal this information.
Also speaking at the hearing was retired navy pilot Ryan Graves who claimed that he had personally witnessed UAPs off the Atlantic coast of the United States "every day for at least a couple years."
Emphasizing that such sightings were "not rare or isolated", he noted that these objects were repeatedly observed by pilots and crews "whose lives depend on accurate identification."
Former navy commander David Fravor also recounted his own experiences with UAPs.
When Grusch was asked whether or not he "absolutely" believes that the US government was in possession of UAPs, he replied: "absolutely, based on interviewing over 40 witnesses over four years."
Ultimately, though, while the hearing provided some intriguing testimonies, it didn't offer up any hard evidence and nothing that was claimed has been made official in any way.
As a result, it is likely that the mystery behind UAP sightings - as well as the truth behind Grusch's startling claims - are likely to remain a topic of heated debate for some time to come.
Yes, and I understand where you are coming from, however I have noticed there are people who won't accept verifiable data, facts, documentation and testimonies regardless. I have watched as they tried to debunk radar data with false information that clearly did not make any sense to those of us who know better. In some cases, I have gone into details about the data, which they refused to believe and in one case, I was basically told I wasn't telling the truth about the Navy's UFO videos when I told them why those videos were real. They claimed, without evidence, those videos were fake so imagi... [More]
#195 Posted by 2 years ago
The people who have denied or ignored the real verifiable data facts, documentation and science are the hardcore ETH believers who won't accept anything that doesn't support their fantasies. So I'll ask you "true believers", if you can, answer the following; Who is concealing the "bodies", what agency? Where are they located? Who is the head of the agency housing them? Who disclosed this information? What was their official title? When and where did this occur? What clearance did they have to have access to that information? Did they have clearance to have that information divulged to them? ... [More]
Dont be surprised if all you get is the standard c/p from some old newspaper followed by a youtube clip with the usual suspects claiming to be in the know.
If you knew any better, you would know that such information would obviously be classified. You also asked, where are the bodies? Once again, classified information, but we can take a look where here where they were initially taken. It seems that you also overlooked who General Arthur E. Exon was. So here it is. Brig. Gen. Arthur E. Exon Gen. Exon has been the highest-ranking military officer to come out and say directly that Roswell was the crash of a spacecraft and that alien bodies were recovered. (Whitley Strieber commentary on ABC UFO special, Feb. 25, 2005, quoting Exon “Everyone... [More]
More like right on time. I might also add that Wright-Patterson AFB is where the U.S. Air Force's 1948 EOTS, ATIC, Wright-Patterson AFB originated, which concluded the objects are, "Interplanetary Spaceships." MANEUVERED MOTION AND "INTELLIGENT CONTROL It concluded that UFOs were interplanetary spaceships." Air Force analysts had reached this conclusion before. Project Sign in 1948 had issued a Top Secret Estimate of the Situation drawing the same conclusion. (Hall, 1964, p. 110) Extraterrestrial presence was reconfirmed in 1952.
#200 Posted by 2 years ago
The greatest hits don't stop here on WETH!!! All the greatest copy and paste hits of the 50's, 60's , 70's and YES even the 80's folks! All the hits, all the time WETH!!!!!!
Historical and factual hits backed by credible testimonies backed by data and other evidence. Let's also remember who were providing hits on JAL 1628 that claimed the UFO maneuvering around the B-747 was Jupiter and possibly Mars.
Please Login or Register to post a comment.