Monday, December 9, 2024
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries
You are viewing: Home > News > Spirituality > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All ▾
Search Submit

Spirituality

Was the Shroud of Turin really used to wrap the body of Jesus ?

By T.K. Randall
November 1, 2024 · Comment icon 44 comments
Turin Shroud
The Turin Shroud. Image Credit: CC BY-SA 3.0 Dianelos Georgoudis
A virtual simulation has been used in an effort to determine if the famous biblical relic really shows the image of Jesus.
Believed by many to be the actual burial cloth of Jesus himself, the Turin Shroud - which is today situated in the Cathedral of St. John the Baptist in Turin, Italy - has long been the subject of intense scrutiny, controversy and debate.

A significant number of researchers have made conflicting claims about the shroud, with some hailing it as authentic and others suggesting that it is either a forgery or not the shroud of Jesus at all.

The findings of this latest study fall firmly into the latter category.

Cicero Moraes - a graphics expert from Brazil - wanted to find out if it was possible for an imprint like that shown on the shroud to actually be created by placing a cloth over a dead body.

To determine this, he created a virtual computer simulation to see if the imprint matched the impressions that an actual human body would make when touching the cloth.
His findings suggested that it was highly unlikely that the shroud featured a genuine image of Jesus.

"When you wrap a 3D object with a fabric, and that object leaves a pattern like blood stains, these stains generate a more robust and more deformed structure in relation to the source," he said.

"So, roughly speaking, what we see as a result of printing stains from a human body would be a more swollen and distorted version of it, not an image that looks like a photocopy. A bas-relief, however, wouldn't cause the image to deform, resulting in a figure that resembles a photocopy of the body."

Moraes was, however, able to offer up his own explanation for the nature and origins of the shroud.

"On one side are those who think it is an authentic shroud of Jesus Christ, on the other, those who think it is a forgery," he said.

"But I am inclined towards another approach: that it is, in fact, a work of Christian art, which managed to convey its intended message very successfully."



Source: WIO News | Comments (44)




Other news and articles
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #35 Posted by Piney 1 month ago
T. O' Conor Sloane? ?
Comment icon #36 Posted by joc 1 month ago
No they are not.  The Secrets of the Universe are not hidden at all ..we are constantly opening new pages of discovery.  One of those 'secrets' is that humans don't "float"  or  " hover"  without mechanical means. So,  The answer is that the shroud is not what it is being sold as.  False Advertising. Nothing more.
Comment icon #37 Posted by Piney 1 month ago
And you don't need a word salad to explain them. And many ignore it. 
Comment icon #38 Posted by Inn Spectre 1 month ago
If you believe history started yesterday, or that all inventions are credited infallibly.
Comment icon #39 Posted by Alex_Rogan 1 month ago
wasn't there once a theory that this was one of the first experiments in photography? was it done by one of the teenage mutant ninja turtles.... I mean, one of the old masters of art and invention? Was it Leo or Mike? I can't remember. The full disclosure was on the Wayback Machine in Archive.org but it's been wiped from the knowledge banks. (don't get yur panties in an uproar. just jokes)
Comment icon #40 Posted by Alex_Rogan 1 month ago
if the photo reactive "film" was wrapped directly over the subject, rather than capturing the light reflected off a mirror, would the film capture an image that could be interpreted as "3D"?
Comment icon #41 Posted by Alex_Rogan 1 month ago
I still love Jesus. Who, or what else, stood against the wickedness of humanity that threatened to envelope all of earth - whether it was Jews, Romans, Egyptians, etc. In the long run.... regardless of belief.... all it did was buy humanity some time to figure out the nature of Earth and the plans of the wicked.     Now stop thinking. Just react and assimilate to the inevitable. Nope. I still love Jesus.
Comment icon #42 Posted by Abramelin 1 month ago
Yep. And the main 'suspect' was Leonardo DaVinci with his camera obscura:  
Comment icon #43 Posted by AZDZ 1 month ago
Correct. The Lord was the eventual answer to them not accepting God as their King. 1 SAM 8.10,20. 
Comment icon #44 Posted by Piney 1 month ago
Samuel was a good genocide manual.   


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Recent news and articles