Friday, May 27, 2016
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help   RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos
Find: in

Neanderthals spoke like modern humans


Posted on Tuesday, 24 December, 2013 | Comment icon 26 comments

The Neanderthals were a sophisticated species extremely similar to modern man. Image Credit: Randii Oliver
A new fossil discovery suggests that humans were not the only species capable of complex speech.
Far from the stereotypical 'cave man' seen in movies, the Neanderthals are believed to have been capable of using complex language and spoke in a way not dissimilar to the way people do today.

The revelation is based on new research in to a fossilized Neanderthal hyoid, a bone that is instrumental in enabling speech. By producing a computer model of the bone and comparing it to that of a modern human, researchers were able to ascertain that the two would have had very similar linguistic capabilities.

"Many would argue that our capacity for speech and language is among the most fundamental of characteristics that make us human," said researcher Stephen Wroe. "If Neanderthals also had language then they were truly human, too."

This discovery combined with other recent studies in to the Neanderthals has shown us that our prehistoric cousins, far from being primitive pre-humans, were extremely similar to ourselves in almost every respect and were ultimately just as 'human' as we are.

Source: BBC News | Comments (26)

Tags: Neanderthal


 
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #17 Posted by White Unicorn on 25 December, 2013, 20:07
It all sounds pretty racist to me. Like a Fir tree telling a blue spruce he is not a pine in a way? Or, sometimes a donkey is better than a horse and sometimes a horse is better than a donkey, it depends on what they are doing, but they are still of the same genius. Each different and each probably thinking they are better than the other LOL.
Comment icon #18 Posted by Neognosis on 25 December, 2013, 20:22
Your analogy is not very apt, as both species are of the genus Homo. A fir tree is NOT a blue spruce, is it? Just like Homo Neanderthal is NOT Homo Sapien. Except that Homo Sapien was better suited to survive. As is evidenced by the fact that I can open my front door and see a few hundred Homo Sapiens and no Homo Neanderthals. Yes, I know there's Neanderthal DNA evidence in some Homo Sapiens, but by and large, we outlived them as a species. Nobody knows for sure why not. I have suspicions, involving our "human" nature, though. I also have a hypothesis that Neanderthals are th... [More]
Comment icon #19 Posted by Parsec on 25 December, 2013, 21:11
No, I don't confuse anything. Maybe you are. The scientific name of our species is Homo Sapiens Sapiens, two times. Genus Homo, species Sapiens, subspecies Sapiens. It's also called the anatomically modern human, and appeared, as far as we know, roughly 100-120.000 years ago (although there's a fossil found dating 195.000 years ago). It differentiates from its predecessor, Homo Sapiens (only one). Some say that our predecessor was Homo Sapiens Idaltu. I was the ironic one when I translated the meaning of "sapiens" from latin, but who invented the name wasn't for sur... [More]
Comment icon #20 Posted by coolguy on 26 December, 2013, 5:30
Iam sure they did speak like humans
Comment icon #21 Posted by TheSpoonyOne on 27 December, 2013, 0:52
I'll have to read the arguments for and against at some point, it sounds fascinating. I've sometimes wondered if, were Neanderthals to exist in today's world with modern humans, how they would be treated and viewed? Whether there would be 'Neanderthal rights' movements, whether there would be a push to argue/classify Neanderthals as no different in any meaningful regard from Homo sapiens sapiens man?
Comment icon #22 Posted by ShadowSot on 27 December, 2013, 2:07
It depends. On the one hand the more gracile neanderthls didn't look much different from HSS. It might be that for the most part we'd interact with vary little differenc.e On the other hand, they may have had unique differences in behaviour that would have set them apart from HSS that didn't leave tangible evidence. And it wasn't that long ago that there was racim against Irish and Italians, so even slight difference could be enough.
Comment icon #23 Posted by TheSpoonyOne on 28 December, 2013, 0:41
There would no doubt be racism (speciesism?), but it's the justification that would be interesting, I mean there's a huge difference between seeing the Irish and Italians as lesser in the past, and seeing a different species of the genus homo as equal, which I'm fairly certain many would argue they were in such a reality.
Comment icon #24 Posted by PersonFromPorlock on 28 December, 2013, 2:02
A fiddly point, but mine own: even if Neanderthal was incapable of speech, as was thought to be the case until fairly recently, that doesn't mean he was incapable of language. He could have communicated fluently with structured whistles, clicking sounds or hand motions. Speech isn't the only mechanism for language.
Comment icon #25 Posted by ShadowSot on 28 December, 2013, 3:00
Well you have to remember that especially later on Neanderthal didn't look that different from us physically. So how much racism there might be is debatable. And from a modern perspective, if they had survived longer there'd have been so much inbreeding it'd just be down to which population has more or less "pure" DNA, but it may well be it wouldn't matter. Good point.


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


  On the forums
Giant squid may grow larger than a school bus
5-27-2016
A new study has suggested that giant squid may actually grow to be much larger than previously believed.
Aristotle's lost tomb has finally been found
5-26-2016
The long-sought final resting place of the Greek philosopher has been unearthed at a site in Macedonia.
New optical clock is most accurate ever built
5-26-2016
Scientists have come up with a clock so accurate that it could even redefine the length of a second.
Neanderthal-built stone rings found in cave
5-25-2016
Remarkable prehistoric structures made from stalagmites have been discovered inside a cave in France.
Featured Videos
Gallery icon 
World's first mile-long pizza
Posted 5-26-2016 | 1 comment
Italian chefs have produced a single gigantic pizza that stretches for an entire mile.
 
What happened before the Big Bang ?
Posted 5-22-2016 | 4 comments
Is it possible to find out what took place before our universe came in to existence ?
 
Prehistoric creatures that still exist
Posted 5-21-2016 | 1 comment
A look at some remarkable animal species that have survived for millions of years.
 
Why do we have 10 fingers and 10 toes ?
Posted 5-20-2016 | 2 comments
What is the reason that we happen to have exactly 10 fingers and toes ? Why that number ?
 
Talking tapes
Posted 5-19-2016 | 1 comment
Tim demonstrates a unique form of audio recording which uses ridged strips of plastic.
 
 View: More videos
Stories & Experiences
Not in our jurisdiction
5-2-2016 | California, United States
 
Zippers and headlights
5-2-2016 | Raleigh, United States
 
Spinning, voiceless and breathless
5-2-2016 | Garland, Texas
 
Paralyzed
4-15-2016 | United States
 
The mysterious awakening
4-6-2016 | Los Angeles, California
 
Chocolate fairy? Really?
4-6-2016 | United Kingdom
 
Christmas Day haunting
4-6-2016 | London, UK
 
The funeral director
3-30-2016 | Hebburn, England
 
A strange sighting in Spain
3-30-2016 | Albatera, Spain
 
Dust patterns on basement floor
3-27-2016 | Smithville, Texas
 

         More stories | Send us your story
 
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.7 Unexplained-Mysteries.com © 2001-2015
Privacy Policy and Disclaimer   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ