Thursday, May 5, 2016   |   3,349 users online
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help   RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos  ·  Chat
Find: in

Seeking the Amazon's lost civilizations

Posted on Friday, 17 January, 2014 | Comment icon 26 comments

What secrets does the rainforest hold ? Image Credit: CC BY-SA 2.0 CIAT
How widespread were pre-Columbian civilizations within the world's largest rainforest ?
The Amazon rainforest is one of the most difficult places for archaeologists to study, not only due to its sheer size but also because undertaking an expedition to the region can prove to be both expensive and perilous.

To help make things easier, scientists have come up with a new way to look for signs of pre-Columbian settlements that can be achieved using a computer. The technique involves mapping regions of the rainforest where the soil has been intentionally enriched for agricultural purposes.

By looking for this enriched soil, known as "terra preta", researchers have been able to piece together a map of the rainforest showing the most populated regions over the last 2,500 years. This map can then be used to pinpoint regions with the highest likelihood of finding earthworks hidden beneath the forest canopy.

The results so far suggest that areas with terra preta are most commonly found in the central and Eastern regions while being less commonly found in the west where runoff from the mountains has made the soil more naturally enriched.

Source: | Comments (26)

Tags: Amazon, Rainforest

Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #17 Posted by Peter B on 17 February, 2014, 10:49
Poor people in developing countries have fewer alternative for earning money than relatively wealthy people in First World countries. If you're a poor Brazilian and the next lot of Amazon forest is a potential source of reliable income for you, why wouldn't you try to elbow the natives off their land?
Comment icon #18 Posted by Likely Guy on 17 February, 2014, 23:37
Because that land isn't owned by poor people. It's 'owned' (I use the term loosely) by lumber barons and cattle kings.
Comment icon #19 Posted by hammerclaw on 23 February, 2014, 21:05 First, Indians had better diets and they were less likely to face starvation and hunger. The first Europeans to reach North America often commented on the large size of the Indians. American Indians were larger than the Europeans simply due to better diets and less starvation. Unlike the Europeans, Indian political leaders did not store their wealth but accumulated prestige by giving food to those in need. No one in an Indian village or an Indian band starved unless all did so. Secondly, American Indian populations did not have many of the infectious diseases... [More]
Comment icon #20 Posted by Calibeliever on 24 February, 2014, 16:05
Never heard that theory. Good stuff.
Comment icon #21 Posted by Erowin on 27 February, 2014, 4:45
According to my anthropology professor, the people in the Americas had much less sickness than Europeans! They were considerably healthier, because they did not have large domesticated livestock. The Europeans lived in close contact with flocks of sheep, herds of cow and oxen, pigs, etc. Animals are a great way to spread disease, especially when they poop everywhere- usually near the villages, since they were so important people liked to keep their animals close. There were plenty of downsides of having no large domesticated animals in the Americas, but it did make it less likely they ... [More]
Comment icon #22 Posted by hammerclaw on 17 March, 2014, 3:20
Why? The answer is simple; population pressure and greed.
Comment icon #23 Posted by Myles on 18 March, 2014, 13:46
Who's "WE"? Just curious. Am I part of "we"? Is the total population of Asia, Africa, North America, Europe and Australia part of this we? Certainly other people of South America is part of this we.
Comment icon #24 Posted by Myles on 18 March, 2014, 13:55
I don't think that this story mean that the people were undiscovered. I'm sure that couple small tribes of people are in the Amazon trying to stay secluded from other tribes who are in more contact with more advanced people. I'm not sure that the word "undiscovered" applies as much. Maybe they can find another of Krippendorf's Tribe. But I think that was supposed to be in New Guinnea.
Comment icon #25 Posted by hammerclaw on 3 May, 2014, 2:50
Comment icon #26 Posted by toyomotor on 14 July, 2014, 3:20
The invention if LIDAR has (almost) made archaeological digs old hat. Using this technology from a satelite or an aircraft, scientists can detect man made patterns on the ground through the vegetation. I have no doubt that future technology will reveal ancient secrets hidden from us for thousands of years.

Please Login or Register to post a comment.

  On the forums
Forum posts:
Forum topics:
Users online:
'Jacuzzi of Despair' found in Gulf of Mexico
A strange circular pocket of super-salty water has been discovered 3,300ft below the surface of the sea.
Mystery of ancient Nazca spiral wells solved
Researchers have managed to solve two mysteries pertaining to Peru's enigmatic Nazca civilization.
Humanoid robot is preparing to go in to space
Known as Valkyrie, the NASA robot could help to set up a colony ahead of the first astronauts on Mars.
Ridiculously rare violet diamond unearthed
An 'impossibly rare' violet diamond has been found within the depths of Australia’s remote Argyle mine.
Featured Videos
Gallery icon 
Why is the sound of chewing so annoying ?
Posted 5-5-2016 | 3 comments
A look at why chewing and other irritating sounds can cause so much distress.
Inside a 6ft air balloon
Posted 5-4-2016 | 1 comment
The Slo Mo Guys record footage of what happens when the balloon you are inside pops.
Catching a mutated som in Chernobyl
Posted 5-3-2016 | 0 comments
Extreme angler Jeremy Wade ventures to Chernobyl to catch a rather unique specimen.
How does an owl fly so silently ?
Posted 5-2-2016 | 1 comment
Researchers record an owl in flight to determine how it flies without making a sound.
Collecting black mamba venom
Posted 5-1-2016 | 1 comment
Even a single bite from a black mamba delivers enough venom to kill up to twenty people.
 View: More videos
Stories & Experiences
Not in our jurisdiction
5-2-2016 | California, United States
Zippers and headlights
5-2-2016 | Raleigh, United States
Spinning, voiceless and breathless
5-2-2016 | Garland, Texas
4-15-2016 | United States
The mysterious awakening
4-6-2016 | Los Angeles, California
Chocolate fairy? Really?
4-6-2016 | United Kingdom
Christmas Day haunting
4-6-2016 | London, UK
The funeral director
3-30-2016 | Hebburn, England
A strange sighting in Spain
3-30-2016 | Albatera, Spain
Dust patterns on basement floor
3-27-2016 | Smithville, Texas

         More stories | Send us your story
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.6 © 2001-2015
Privacy Policy and Disclaimer   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ