Saturday, July 22, 2017
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help   RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos
Find: in

Hypersonic passenger jet to fly at 16,000mph


Posted on Sunday, 31 January, 2016 | Comment icon 38 comments

The scramjet would be capable of travelling at 16,000mph. Image Credit: Imaginactive.org
The Antipode luxury business airplane will be able to travel from London to New York in 11 minutes.
The plane, which is the brainchild of Canadian industrial designer Charles Bombardier, will travel at 24 times the speed of sound - that's only slightly slower than the Space Shuttle's re-entry speed.

Its unusual design, which features a short body and angled wings, is quite unlike any other airplane out there and it even incorporates reusable rocket boosters and a built-in scramjet engine.

"I wanted to create an aircraft concept capable of reaching its antipode - or diametrical opposite - as fast as possible," said Bombardier during an interview with Forbes.

At 16,000 miles per hour the ridiculously fast plane would be capable of travelling from New York to Sydney in just 30 minutes, however not even NASA has been able to develop a stable enough engine for such a vehicle and the g-forces involved would be crippling.

It remains to be seen whether the ambitious design will ever make it off the drawing board.


Source: New York Daily News | Comments (38)

Tags: Antipode, Hypersonic

Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #29 Posted by BeastieRunner on 1 February, 2016, 20:34
Appropriately named gent.
Comment icon #30 Posted by regeneratia on 1 February, 2016, 22:03
I wont fly on this lol Me neither. Only a fool would. I think you'll find the technology would work in such a way that the craft could travel to other locations too. Now THAT would be very nice. Paris for dinner.
Comment icon #31 Posted by Hawkin on 5 February, 2016, 6:01
I think the military already have aircraft capable of such speeds but the design and materials are kept classified. Totally agree. If the SR71 was flying at Mach 3 in the early 1960's, Then there's surely something much faster that we don't know about.
Comment icon #32 Posted by Noteverythingisaconspiracy on 5 February, 2016, 10:38
If the Concorde was too expensive to run flying at mach 2, I fail to see how this would be able to make any financial sense. With only 10 passenger it would be even less economical than Concorde. Don't get me wrong the Concorde was a beautiful plane and an impressive technological feat, but it was never an affordable passenger transport.
Comment icon #33 Posted by Derek Willis on 7 February, 2016, 14:02
If the Concorde was too expensive to run flying at mach 2, I fail to see how this would be able to make any financial sense. With only 10 passenger it would be even less economical than Concorde. Don't get me wrong the Concorde was a beautiful plane and an impressive technological feat, but it was never an affordable passenger transport. Perhaps the target market for the super-fast plane is billionaires. People like Bill Gates have incomes of millions of dollars each day. Perhaps they would happily pay to get from continent to continent twenty times faster than everyone else.
Comment icon #34 Posted by ChaosRose on 7 February, 2016, 15:55
I wonder what size creator would this jet make, if crashed at the speed of 13,000 mph They could probably do away with that ridiculous...in the event of a "water landing" speech.
Comment icon #35 Posted by Derek Willis on 7 February, 2016, 19:28
Totally agree. If the SR71 was flying at Mach 3 in the early 1960's, Then there's surely something much faster that we don't know about. NASA and Lockheed Martin spent over a $1.3 billion developing the X-33, an unmanned sub-orbital "space plane". A prototype was almost finished before the program was cancelled in 2001. Much of the technology needed for the Skreemr will be hidden in a hangar somewhere.
Comment icon #36 Posted by Derek Willis on 7 February, 2016, 19:40
The heat and pressure are caused by atmospheric drag and space crafts do not reach Mach10 in the lower atmosphere. The Space Shuttles, for example, reduced their engine thrust level down to 67% after around 50 seconds into the flight and short b4 passing the sound barrier to reduce the dynamic pressure to the space crafts structure. After passing the barrier of sound and being in the higher atmosphere, so less drag, the engine thrust level was increased to 100% again. I remember reading somewhere that the throttling down at max-q was more to do with the loads transferring to the structures hol... [More]
Comment icon #37 Posted by toast on 7 February, 2016, 20:50
I remember reading somewhere that the throttling down at max-q was more to do with the loads transferring to the structures holding the external tank to the shuttle, rather than the loads on the shuttle itself. Of course the q-max factor was also related to the piggyback structures of the ET but it was also relevant to the orbiters structures as the q-max factor is relevant for all kind of rockets/shuttles rockets heading orbit. I would imagine the Skreemr would be pretty high before itreached Mach 10, in the same way Concorde had to be at 60,000 feet to reduce drag and heating at Mach 2. Yeah... [More]
Comment icon #38 Posted by Derek Willis on 7 February, 2016, 22:51
Of course the q-max factor was also related to the piggyback structures of the ET but it was also relevant to the orbiters structures as the q-max factor is relevant for all kind of rockets/shuttles rockets heading orbit. Yeah but I dont think that scramjet technology will be used in the near future for commercial applications for various reasons so the Mach20 dream for private individuals will remain a dream. To date, the use of this still not fully developed technology is limited to military devices like Cruise Missiles and AAMs which just reach speeds around Mach4 to 5 or so. Military R&... [More]


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


  On the forums
Forum posts:
Forum topics:
Members:

5947567
256086
168249

 
Did sea creatures push US in to Vietnam War ?
7-22-2017
Back in 1964, the Gulf of Tonkin incident resulted in a renewed commitment to war with Vietnam.
Scientist has 'solved' the Bermuda Triangle
7-22-2017
Dr Karl Kruszelnicki maintains that the answer to the mystery lies in little more than basic human error.
Scientists develop bizarre worm-like robot
7-22-2017
Stanford University researchers have built a robot that can literally worm its way around anything.
Mystery of Abe Lincoln's Bixby letter solved
7-21-2017
Forensic linguists have 'almost certainly' determined who really wrote the famous Civil War-era letter.
Featured Videos
Gallery icon 
Counting to one billion
Posted 7-22-2017 | 0 comments
How long would it take to count to one billion and has anyone ever managed to do so ?
 
Dolphins beach themselves to catch fish
Posted 7-21-2017 | 0 comments
These remarkable dolphins have come up with a unique way to catch themselves a meal.
 
Do not microwave an airbag
Posted 7-20-2017 | 2 comments
The Slo Mo Guys capture what happens when you put an airbag in a microwave.
 
How do fireworks get their colors ?
Posted 7-19-2017 | 0 comments
Fireworks are well known for their colorful explosions, but where do the colors come from ?
 
The man who swims towards sharks
Posted 7-18-2017 | 1 comment
Marine biologist Yannis doesn't avoid sharks, he deliberately seeks them out.
 
 View: More videos
Stories & Experiences
Spider signs
7-21-2017 | Michigan
 
My ancestry is calling me
7-21-2017 | Morgan Hill, Ca
 
I can hear someone
6-27-2017 | Maryland
 
My dead father spoke to me
6-27-2017 | Alabama
 
Is my child predicting our death ?
6-27-2017 | Lincoln Park, MI
 
Craig is here
6-10-2017 | Phoenix AZ
 
We saw the same thing!
6-10-2017 | Pooler, GA
 
 
Three female faces
6-5-2017 | Illinois (IL)
 
Encounter at 3:33 AM
6-5-2017 | Budapest
 

         More stories | Send us your story
 
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.7 Unexplained-Mysteries.com © 2001-2017
Privacy Policy and Disclaimer   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ