Sunday, December 28, 2014   |   3,870 users online
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help   RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos  ·  Chat
Find: in

Should we release all we know about space ?


Posted on Monday, 7 December, 2009 | Comment icon 6 comments


Image credit: NASA
 
Three astronomers have argued that it might be a bad idea to release everything discovered about the cosmos following ESA's Planck mission in 2013 due to the unavailability of additional data once we've learned all there is to know.

"Cosmologists are doing the happy dance. The European Space Agency's Planck mission is busy surveying the cosmic microwave background, aka the "echo" of the big bang, and in 2013 will release a feast of data that promises to deliver profound new insights into the origin of the universe."

  View: Full article |  Source: New Scientist

  Discuss: View comments (6)

   


 
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #1 Posted by Triade on 7 December, 2009, 15:20
2013 eh...marked it on my calender I wouldn't mind all the data being released..i think everyone has as much right to it. There shouldn't be an elite of space-knowledge.
Comment icon #2 Posted by Torgo on 7 December, 2009, 15:28
Why can't the astronomers just restrict the dataset on their own, in order to test hypotheses on different sections of the data?
Comment icon #3 Posted by Kensei on 7 December, 2009, 23:17
What they are wanting to hide is here: . Religious censorship of science data? No thanks. We the Public paid for the data, and we want it all. Now.
Comment icon #4 Posted by RamboIII on 8 December, 2009, 5:26
Lol the only reason there is a yingyang symbol is because the half of the universe we are traveling toward is being blueshifted while the half we are moving away from is being redshifted.
Comment icon #5 Posted by Torgo on 9 December, 2009, 1:28
They are not talking about keeping the data classified or such. They are (rather needlessly, I think) talking about trickling the data out slowly over time so that scientists can generate hypotheses and theories about the early universe based on chunks of the data, and test these theories against other chunks of data. I think it is a silly idea, as scientists could just as easily segment the data themselves.
Comment icon #6 Posted by ROGER on 9 December, 2009, 9:58
In other words they are creating their own Job security?


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Other news in this category
Scientists develop new way to reach Mars
Posted 12-26-2014 | 7 comments
A cheaper and safer way to get to Mars will make it far easier to send missions there in the future....
 
Nukes could be used to destroy asteroids
Posted 12-22-2014 | 52 comments
The ultimate weapons of mass destruction could one day save us from complete annihilation....
 
NASA proposes a 'cloud city' above Venus
Posted 12-21-2014 | 50 comments
A future manned mission to Venus could see astronauts piloting blimps around the planet's atmosphere....
 
Kepler discovers new extrasolar planet
Posted 12-21-2014 | 7 comments
NASA's Kepler space telescope has made its first discovery since being crippled by a technical fault....
 
Could Eta Carinae explode and wipe us out ?
Posted 12-19-2014 | 24 comments
A massive and volatile star located 7,500 light years away is on the verge of going supernova....
 
Has Curiosity found evidence of life on Mars?
Posted 12-17-2014 | 68 comments
NASA's exploratory rover has discovered mysterious 'belches' of methane gas on the surface of Mars....
 
Color photograph of comet 67P released
Posted 12-15-2014 | 7 comments
For the first time Rosetta's new home can be viewed in full color, even though there isn't much of it....
 

 View: More news in this category
 
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.6 Unexplained-Mysteries.com © 2001-2014
Privacy Policy and Disclaimer   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ