Monday, March 2, 2015   |   3,330 users online
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help   RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos  ·  Chat
Find: in

Should we release all we know about space ?


Posted on Monday, 7 December, 2009 | Comment icon 6 comments


Image credit: NASA
 
Three astronomers have argued that it might be a bad idea to release everything discovered about the cosmos following ESA's Planck mission in 2013 due to the unavailability of additional data once we've learned all there is to know.

"Cosmologists are doing the happy dance. The European Space Agency's Planck mission is busy surveying the cosmic microwave background, aka the "echo" of the big bang, and in 2013 will release a feast of data that promises to deliver profound new insights into the origin of the universe."

  View: Full article |  Source: New Scientist

  Discuss: View comments (6)

   


 
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #1 Posted by Triade on 7 December, 2009, 15:20
2013 eh...marked it on my calender I wouldn't mind all the data being released..i think everyone has as much right to it. There shouldn't be an elite of space-knowledge.
Comment icon #2 Posted by Torgo on 7 December, 2009, 15:28
Why can't the astronomers just restrict the dataset on their own, in order to test hypotheses on different sections of the data?
Comment icon #3 Posted by Kensei on 7 December, 2009, 23:17
What they are wanting to hide is here: . Religious censorship of science data? No thanks. We the Public paid for the data, and we want it all. Now.
Comment icon #4 Posted by RamboIII on 8 December, 2009, 5:26
Lol the only reason there is a yingyang symbol is because the half of the universe we are traveling toward is being blueshifted while the half we are moving away from is being redshifted.
Comment icon #5 Posted by Torgo on 9 December, 2009, 1:28
They are not talking about keeping the data classified or such. They are (rather needlessly, I think) talking about trickling the data out slowly over time so that scientists can generate hypotheses and theories about the early universe based on chunks of the data, and test these theories against other chunks of data. I think it is a silly idea, as scientists could just as easily segment the data themselves.
Comment icon #6 Posted by ROGER on 9 December, 2009, 9:58
In other words they are creating their own Job security?


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Other news in this category
What would life on Titan be like ?
Posted 3-1-2015 | 6 comments
Scientists have come up with a concept for a life form that could survive on Saturn's moon Titan....
 
Curiosity rover confirms methane on Mars
Posted 3-1-2015 | 28 comments
The rover's instruments have picked up unequivocal evidence that there really is methane on Mars....
 
Scientists discover gigantic black hole
Posted 2-28-2015 | 21 comments
Located at the center of a quasar, the object is more than two billion times more massive than our sun....
 
Second mystery bright spot sighted on Ceres
Posted 2-26-2015 | 54 comments
NASA has revealed that another mysterious bright spot has been discovered on the dwarf planet's surface....
 
Hawking: space travel will save mankind
Posted 2-21-2015 | 36 comments
The celebrated physicist compared the exploration of space to 'life insurance' for the human race....
 
Is it possible to build a space elevator ?
Posted 2-21-2015 | 14 comments
While undeniably useful, the concept of a space elevator may simply be impractical in the real world....
 
Alien star once invaded our solar system
Posted 2-18-2015 | 13 comments
A red dwarf star is thought to have passed within one light year of our planet 70,000 years ago....
 

 View: More news in this category
 
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.6 Unexplained-Mysteries.com © 2001-2015
Privacy Policy and Disclaimer   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ