Tuesday, January 24, 2017
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help   RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos
Find: in

Humans left trees 4.2 million years ago


Posted on Friday, 11 February, 2011 | Comment icon 8 comments | News tip by: Still Waters


Image credit: Claire Huock

 
It is thought that our distant ancestors started walking on the ground up to 4.2 million years ago.

The timing of the switch suggests that it was influenced by a number of factors including changes in climate and an increase in grasslands meaning fewer trees and a greater need to cross the open ground between them.

"Early human ancestors stopped swinging in trees and started walking on the ground sometime between 4."

  View: Full article |  Source: Discovery News

  Discuss: View comments (8)

   


 
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #1 Posted by tipotep on 11 February, 2011, 0:48
Meh i think they are guessing here considering ..... The former species is 600,000 years older than the latter and is believed to be its ancestor "believed" does not make for a solid conclusion ....TiP
Comment icon #2 Posted by :PsYKoTiC:BeHAvIoR: on 11 February, 2011, 17:22
Meh i think they are guessing here considering ..... "believed" does not make for a solid conclusion .... TiP Very true. With Darwin's theory of evolution, if we did evolve from apes or chimps, then the missing link will be found eventually. We dig out new fossils every day along with variants of existing species.
Comment icon #3 Posted by Andami on 12 February, 2011, 4:02
Very true. With Darwin's theory of evolution, if we did evolve from apes or chimps, then the missing link will be found eventually. We dig out new fossils every day along with variants of existing species. One, we didn't evolve from apes and chimps, but we probably have a common ancestor. Two, I doubt there will ever be a fossil discovered that turns out to be the "missing link" that everyone is wanting. I may sound pessimistic, but even if something was found that could satisfy the requirements of being a "missing link" many people would argue that it isn't. Why do I think this? Because of ho... [More]
Comment icon #4 Posted by Odin11 on 12 February, 2011, 6:11
Very true. With Darwin's theory of evolution, if we did evolve from apes or chimps, then the missing link will be found eventually. We dig out new fossils every day along with variants of existing species. Like Andami pretty much said, there is no such thing as a "missing link". But there are transitional fossils. In the way that people use "missing link" the following can almost all be called that. Sahelanthropus tchadensis Orrorin tugenensis Ardipithecus ramidus Australopithecus anamensis Australopithecus afarensis Kenyanthropus platyops Australopithecus africanus Australopithecus garhi Aust... [More]
Comment icon #5 Posted by danielost on 12 February, 2011, 6:16
Like Andami pretty much said, there is no such thing as a "missing link". But there are transitional fossils. In the way that people use "missing link" the following can almost all be called that. Sahelanthropus tchadensis Orrorin tugenensis Ardipithecus ramidus Australopithecus anamensis Australopithecus afarensis Kenyanthropus platyops Australopithecus africanus Australopithecus garhi Australopithecus sediba Australopithecus aethiopicus Homo habilis Homo georgicus Homo erectus Homo ergaster Homo antecessor Homo heidelbergensis Homo neanderthalensis Homo sapiens problem is until you hit homo ... [More]
Comment icon #6 Posted by Evilution13 on 12 February, 2011, 12:24
I think if man screws the world up completely, we should just climb back up into the trees and be done with it. If there's any left.
Comment icon #7 Posted by BaneSilvermoon on 14 February, 2011, 8:24
Like Andami pretty much said, there is no such thing as a "missing link". But there are transitional fossils. In the way that people use "missing link" the following can almost all be called that. Sahelanthropus tchadensis Orrorin tugenensis Ardipithecus ramidus Australopithecus anamensis Australopithecus afarensis Kenyanthropus platyops Australopithecus africanus Australopithecus garhi Australopithecus sediba Australopithecus aethiopicus Homo habilis Homo georgicus Homo erectus Homo ergaster Homo antecessor Homo heidelbergensis Homo neanderthalensis Homo sapiens Precisely, missing link is a t... [More]
Comment icon #8 Posted by :PsYKoTiC:BeHAvIoR: on 14 February, 2011, 14:03
One, we didn't evolve from apes and chimps, but we probably have a common ancestor. Two, I doubt there will ever be a fossil discovered that turns out to be the "missing link" that everyone is wanting. I may sound pessimistic, but even if something was found that could satisfy the requirements of being a "missing link" many people would argue that it isn't. Why do I think this? Because of how many times people have claimed of discovering the "missing link." Just Google "missing link between apes and humans" to see what I mean. Like Andami pretty much said, there is no such thing as a "missing ... [More]


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


  On the forums
Forum posts:
Forum topics:
Members:

5860364
264711
165197

 
Scientists invent UV 'Spider-Man' adhesive
1-24-2017
German scientists have developed a new type of super-strong adhesive that reacts to ultraviolet light.
'Umbrella Drone' can keep the rain off you
1-24-2017
A firm in England is selling a bizarre drone with an umbrella that will attempt to keep you dry outside.
Scientists create semi-synthetic life forms
1-24-2017
For the first time ever, researchers have succeeded in creating healthy organisms with synthetic DNA.
Microbial life can survive on Mars after all
1-23-2017
A new study has added weight to the idea that microbes can survive in the harsh conditions on Mars.
Other news in this category
Fossils of giant otter unearthed in China
Posted 1-23-2017 | 7 comments
Paleontologists have revealed the discovery of a prehistoric otter that was around the size of a wolf....
 
Did humans wipe out Australia's megafauna ?
Posted 1-22-2017 | 5 comments
A new study has cast doubt on the idea that climate change wiped out most of Australia's huge beasts....
 
Prehistoric human DNA found on cave floor
Posted 1-8-2017 | 6 comments
Scientists have found a way to identify the DNA of our ancestors from prehistoric bone dust samples....
 
Dinosaurs died out due to incubation period
Posted 1-3-2017 | 15 comments
A new theory has suggested that the dinosaurs became extinct because they couldn't hatch quickly enough....
 
Prehistoric bird hints at warm North Pole
Posted 12-29-2016 | 4 comments
A newly discovered species of seagull-like bird lived at a time when the Arctic was as warm as Florida....
 
Some dinosaurs lost their teeth as they aged
Posted 12-23-2016 | 4 comments
Some young meat-eating dinosaurs lost their teeth as they grew up and ended up becoming plant-eaters....
 
Prehistoric footprints unearthed in Tanzania
Posted 12-14-2016 | 7 comments
Several sets of footprints left by an ancient human ancestor have been found at the site of a new museum....
 
Actual dinosaur tail found preserved in amber
Posted 12-8-2016 | 47 comments
The unprecedented 99 million-year-old specimen contains preserved bones, soft tissues and feathers....
 
Japan is set to build a robotic Jurassic Park
Posted 11-19-2016 | 17 comments
Dino-a-Live will offer visitors the next best thing to real dinosaurs without the risk of being eaten....
 

 View: More news in this category
 
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.7 Unexplained-Mysteries.com © 2001-2017
Privacy Policy and Disclaimer   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ