Wednesday, July 26, 2017
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help   RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos
Find: in
This news story is archived which means that, while it is still available to view, the information contained within may be outdated and the original source site/link may no longer be viewable.

For the most recent stories, please visit either the site's home page or main news section.

Humans left trees 4.2 million years ago

Posted on Friday, 11 February, 2011 | Comment icon 8 comments | News tip by: Still Waters


Image credit: Claire Huock

 
It is thought that our distant ancestors started walking on the ground up to 4.2 million years ago.

The timing of the switch suggests that it was influenced by a number of factors including changes in climate and an increase in grasslands meaning fewer trees and a greater need to cross the open ground between them.

"Early human ancestors stopped swinging in trees and started walking on the ground sometime between 4."

  View: Full article

 Source: Discovery News


  Discuss: View comments (8)

   


 
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #1 Posted by tipotep on 11 February, 2011, 0:48
Meh i think they are guessing here considering ..... The former species is 600,000 years older than the latter and is believed to be its ancestor "believed" does not make for a solid conclusion ....TiP
Comment icon #2 Posted by :PsYKoTiC:BeHAvIoR: on 11 February, 2011, 17:22
Meh i think they are guessing here considering ..... "believed" does not make for a solid conclusion .... TiP Very true. With Darwin's theory of evolution, if we did evolve from apes or chimps, then the missing link will be found eventually. We dig out new fossils every day along with variants of existing species.
Comment icon #3 Posted by Andami on 12 February, 2011, 4:02
Very true. With Darwin's theory of evolution, if we did evolve from apes or chimps, then the missing link will be found eventually. We dig out new fossils every day along with variants of existing species. One, we didn't evolve from apes and chimps, but we probably have a common ancestor. Two, I doubt there will ever be a fossil discovered that turns out to be the "missing link" that everyone is wanting. I may sound pessimistic, but even if something was found that could satisfy the requirements of being a "missing link" many people would argue that it isn't. Why do I think this? Because of ho... [More]
Comment icon #4 Posted by Odin11 on 12 February, 2011, 6:11
Very true. With Darwin's theory of evolution, if we did evolve from apes or chimps, then the missing link will be found eventually. We dig out new fossils every day along with variants of existing species. Like Andami pretty much said, there is no such thing as a "missing link". But there are transitional fossils. In the way that people use "missing link" the following can almost all be called that. Sahelanthropus tchadensis Orrorin tugenensis Ardipithecus ramidus Australopithecus anamensis Australopithecus afarensis Kenyanthropus platyops Australopithecus africanus Australopithecus garhi Aust... [More]
Comment icon #5 Posted by danielost on 12 February, 2011, 6:16
Like Andami pretty much said, there is no such thing as a "missing link". But there are transitional fossils. In the way that people use "missing link" the following can almost all be called that. Sahelanthropus tchadensis Orrorin tugenensis Ardipithecus ramidus Australopithecus anamensis Australopithecus afarensis Kenyanthropus platyops Australopithecus africanus Australopithecus garhi Australopithecus sediba Australopithecus aethiopicus Homo habilis Homo georgicus Homo erectus Homo ergaster Homo antecessor Homo heidelbergensis Homo neanderthalensis Homo sapiens problem is until you hit homo ... [More]
Comment icon #6 Posted by Evilution13 on 12 February, 2011, 12:24
I think if man screws the world up completely, we should just climb back up into the trees and be done with it. If there's any left.
Comment icon #7 Posted by BaneSilvermoon on 14 February, 2011, 8:24
Like Andami pretty much said, there is no such thing as a "missing link". But there are transitional fossils. In the way that people use "missing link" the following can almost all be called that. Sahelanthropus tchadensis Orrorin tugenensis Ardipithecus ramidus Australopithecus anamensis Australopithecus afarensis Kenyanthropus platyops Australopithecus africanus Australopithecus garhi Australopithecus sediba Australopithecus aethiopicus Homo habilis Homo georgicus Homo erectus Homo ergaster Homo antecessor Homo heidelbergensis Homo neanderthalensis Homo sapiens Precisely, missing link is a t... [More]
Comment icon #8 Posted by :PsYKoTiC:BeHAvIoR: on 14 February, 2011, 14:03
One, we didn't evolve from apes and chimps, but we probably have a common ancestor. Two, I doubt there will ever be a fossil discovered that turns out to be the "missing link" that everyone is wanting. I may sound pessimistic, but even if something was found that could satisfy the requirements of being a "missing link" many people would argue that it isn't. Why do I think this? Because of how many times people have claimed of discovering the "missing link." Just Google "missing link between apes and humans" to see what I mean. Like Andami pretty much said, there is no such thing as a "missing ... [More]


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


  On the forums
Time is key to happiness, new study claims
7-25-2017
According to researchers, stressing out over a lack of time is a leading cause of anxiety and depression.
Eden Project UFO revealed as publicity stunt
7-25-2017
Videos and pictures of an alleged UFO over Cornwall have turned out to be part of a promotional exercise.
Moon is much wetter than previously thought
7-25-2017
Satellite data has revealed that there is water trapped all across the Moon's surface, not just at the poles.
New species of giant sunfish discovered
7-24-2017
Marine researcher Marianne Nyegaard has identified the first new species of sunfish in over 130 years.
Other news in this category
Could a human actually outrun a T. rex ?
Posted 7-17-2017 | 17 comments
Contrary to the plot of Jurassic Park, a rampaging Tyrannosaurus rex wouldn't actually move very fast....
 
Giant prehistoric crocodile had T. rex teeth
Posted 7-4-2017 | 2 comments
Palaeontologists have been studying the remains of a crocodile-like land predator from the Jurassic era....
 
Intense volcanism gave rise to the dinosaurs
Posted 6-20-2017 | 5 comments
A mass extinction event 200 million years ago made it possible for the dinosaurs to dominate the planet....
 
T. rex did not have feathers, say scientists
Posted 6-10-2017 | 16 comments
The idea that Tyrannosaurus rex had a thick plumage of feathers has been called in to serious doubt....
 
Ancient fossil bird found trapped in amber
Posted 6-9-2017 | 1 comment
The incredibly well-preserved hatchling is believed to date back 99 million years to the Cretaceous Era....
 
Earliest Homo sapiens unearthed in Morocco
Posted 6-8-2017 | 8 comments
The discovery casts doubt on the idea that modern humans evolved in a single 'cradle of humanity'....
 
Giant prehistoric sloth unearthed in LA metro
Posted 6-3-2017 | 4 comments
A recent excavation in the heart of Los Angeles has yielded evidence of giant prehistoric beasts....
 
Ancient sea monster was the size of a bus
Posted 5-26-2017 | 3 comments
Palaeontologists in Russia have discovered a huge new sea creature that lived 130 million years ago....
 
Europe, not Africa, was birthplace of mankind
Posted 5-23-2017 | 25 comments
A remarkable new palaeontological discovery in Europe could rewrite the history of human evolution....
 

 View: More news in this category
 
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.7 Unexplained-Mysteries.com 2001-2017
Privacy Policy and Disclaimer   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ