Wednesday, September 20, 2017
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help   RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos
Find: in
This news story is archived which means that, while it is still available to view, the information contained within may be outdated and the original source site/link may no longer be viewable.

For the most recent stories, please visit either the site's home page or main news section.

Humans left trees 4.2 million years ago

Posted on Friday, 11 February, 2011 | Comment icon 8 comments | News tip by: Still Waters


Image credit: Claire Huock

 
It is thought that our distant ancestors started walking on the ground up to 4.2 million years ago.

The timing of the switch suggests that it was influenced by a number of factors including changes in climate and an increase in grasslands meaning fewer trees and a greater need to cross the open ground between them.

"Early human ancestors stopped swinging in trees and started walking on the ground sometime between 4."

  View: Full article

 Source: Discovery News


  Discuss: View comments (8)

   


 
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #1 Posted by tipotep on 11 February, 2011, 0:48
Meh i think they are guessing here considering ..... The former species is 600,000 years older than the latter and is believed to be its ancestor "believed" does not make for a solid conclusion ....TiP
Comment icon #2 Posted by :PsYKoTiC:BeHAvIoR: on 11 February, 2011, 17:22
Meh i think they are guessing here considering ..... "believed" does not make for a solid conclusion .... TiP Very true. With Darwin's theory of evolution, if we did evolve from apes or chimps, then the missing link will be found eventually. We dig out new fossils every day along with variants of existing species.
Comment icon #3 Posted by Andami on 12 February, 2011, 4:02
Very true. With Darwin's theory of evolution, if we did evolve from apes or chimps, then the missing link will be found eventually. We dig out new fossils every day along with variants of existing species. One, we didn't evolve from apes and chimps, but we probably have a common ancestor. Two, I doubt there will ever be a fossil discovered that turns out to be the "missing link" that everyone is wanting. I may sound pessimistic, but even if something was found that could satisfy the requirements of being a "missing link" many people would argue that it isn't. Why do I think this? Because of ho... [More]
Comment icon #4 Posted by Odin11 on 12 February, 2011, 6:11
Very true. With Darwin's theory of evolution, if we did evolve from apes or chimps, then the missing link will be found eventually. We dig out new fossils every day along with variants of existing species. Like Andami pretty much said, there is no such thing as a "missing link". But there are transitional fossils. In the way that people use "missing link" the following can almost all be called that. Sahelanthropus tchadensis Orrorin tugenensis Ardipithecus ramidus Australopithecus anamensis Australopithecus afarensis Kenyanthropus platyops Australopithecus africanus Australopithecus garhi Aust... [More]
Comment icon #5 Posted by danielost on 12 February, 2011, 6:16
Like Andami pretty much said, there is no such thing as a "missing link". But there are transitional fossils. In the way that people use "missing link" the following can almost all be called that. Sahelanthropus tchadensis Orrorin tugenensis Ardipithecus ramidus Australopithecus anamensis Australopithecus afarensis Kenyanthropus platyops Australopithecus africanus Australopithecus garhi Australopithecus sediba Australopithecus aethiopicus Homo habilis Homo georgicus Homo erectus Homo ergaster Homo antecessor Homo heidelbergensis Homo neanderthalensis Homo sapiens problem is until you hit homo ... [More]
Comment icon #6 Posted by Evilution13 on 12 February, 2011, 12:24
I think if man screws the world up completely, we should just climb back up into the trees and be done with it. If there's any left.
Comment icon #7 Posted by BaneSilvermoon on 14 February, 2011, 8:24
Like Andami pretty much said, there is no such thing as a "missing link". But there are transitional fossils. In the way that people use "missing link" the following can almost all be called that. Sahelanthropus tchadensis Orrorin tugenensis Ardipithecus ramidus Australopithecus anamensis Australopithecus afarensis Kenyanthropus platyops Australopithecus africanus Australopithecus garhi Australopithecus sediba Australopithecus aethiopicus Homo habilis Homo georgicus Homo erectus Homo ergaster Homo antecessor Homo heidelbergensis Homo neanderthalensis Homo sapiens Precisely, missing link is a t... [More]
Comment icon #8 Posted by :PsYKoTiC:BeHAvIoR: on 14 February, 2011, 14:03
One, we didn't evolve from apes and chimps, but we probably have a common ancestor. Two, I doubt there will ever be a fossil discovered that turns out to be the "missing link" that everyone is wanting. I may sound pessimistic, but even if something was found that could satisfy the requirements of being a "missing link" many people would argue that it isn't. Why do I think this? Because of how many times people have claimed of discovering the "missing link." Just Google "missing link between apes and humans" to see what I mean. Like Andami pretty much said, there is no such thing as a "missing ... [More]


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


  On the forums
Forum posts:
Forum topics:
Members:

5986677
257708
169456

 
Porpoise unearthed in medieval graveyard
9-20-2017
A recent archaeological dig near Guernsey has yielded something rather unexpected - a porpoise skeleton.
Mystery surrounds flushed money in Geneva
9-19-2017
An unknown individual has been flushing thousands of euros down the toilet and nobody knows why.
'Octopus city' found off coast of Australia
9-19-2017
Members of the gloomy octopus species have created their own underwater settlement dubbed 'Octlantis'.
60 ancient shipwrecks found in the Black Sea
9-19-2017
Marine archaeologists unexpectedly stumbled across a goldmine of shipwrecks during a recent expedition.
Other news in this category
Prehistoric whales were ferocious predators
Posted 8-30-2017 | 4 comments
The ancestors of today's blue whales were deadly predators with rows of large, razor-sharp teeth....
 
Largest known Ichthyosaurus was pregnant
Posted 8-28-2017 | 5 comments
Palaeontologists have discovered an enormous Ichthyosaurus specimen in a German museum collection....
 
Extinct toothless dwarf dolphin unveiled
Posted 8-23-2017 | 3 comments
Scientists have identified an extinct species of mini-dolphin that lived over 30 million years ago....
 
'Frankenstein dinosaur' is 'missing link'
Posted 8-16-2017 | 0 comments
The mystery surrounding a dinosaur made up of various mismatched body parts has finally been solved....
 
13 million-year-old human ancestor unearthed
Posted 8-10-2017 | 28 comments
Palaeontologists have discovered the skull of what is thought to be mankind's earliest known ancestor....
 
World's largest ever dinosaur identified
Posted 8-9-2017 | comments
A 70-ton titanosaur has been officially established as the largest land animal ever to walk the Earth....
 
Heavily armored dinosaurs also had camouflage
Posted 8-5-2017 | 21 comments
Dinosaurs equipped with spikes and bony plates may have also employed camouflage to avoid predators....
 
Could a human actually outrun a T. rex ?
Posted 7-17-2017 | 17 comments
Contrary to the plot of Jurassic Park, a rampaging Tyrannosaurus rex wouldn't actually move very fast....
 
Giant prehistoric crocodile had T. rex teeth
Posted 7-4-2017 | 2 comments
Palaeontologists have been studying the remains of a crocodile-like land predator from the Jurassic era....
 

 View: More news in this category
 
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.7 Unexplained-Mysteries.com 2001-2017
Privacy Policy and Disclaimer   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ