Saturday, April 27, 2024
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries
You are viewing: Home > News > Space & Astronomy > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All ▾
Search Submit

Space & Astronomy

Mars thought to be smaller than it should be

By T.K. Randall
February 18, 2011 · Comment icon 13 comments

Image Credit: NASA
Simulations of the solar system's formation have indicated that Mars should be larger than it is.
Planetary scientists believe that Mars should be 5-10 times its current size, one possible theory is that Mars migrated away from planet-forming materials at some point during its formation. "Everyone who does simulations of how you form terrestrial planets always ends up with a Mars that is 5-10 times bigger than it is in real life," says Dr. David Minton.
"According to the model, planetesimals likely also caused the migration of the planets, too. The planets formed from a giant disk of gas, dust, rocky debris and ice surrounding the early Sun. Debris coalesced to form bigger planet-sized objects, and simulations shows that bigger planet-sized object embedded in a disk of smaller objects will migrate as a result of angular momentum and energy conservation as the planets scatter the planetesimals they encounter. "


Source: Universe Today | Comments (13)




Other news and articles
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #4 Posted by marcos anthony toledo 13 years ago
There is a possibilty that Mars was a moon of a much larger planet that was destroyed some time in the past and became a planet later.
Comment icon #5 Posted by zenfahr 13 years ago
There is a possibilty that Mars was a moon of a much larger planet that was destroyed some time in the past and became a planet later. I think that is a very possible and logical idea.
Comment icon #6 Posted by 747400 13 years ago
It does seem to be smaller now than it once was. Maybe they just use less chocolate now, or maybe it's because they use metric weights. Mind you, it's the same with most kinds of chocolate bar, they always seemed bigger when you were a kid. I've never heard the word "planetesimal" before, by the way. I'm going to try to get in in whereverr I can at every opportunity.
Comment icon #7 Posted by Twinkle Arora is back 13 years ago
“Everyone who does simulations of how you form terrestrial planets always ends up with a Mars that is 5-10 times bigger than it is in real life.” which simulation? A computer made?? I always get astonished by the fact that scientists assume so much about everything,, but the truth is that they're never going to know what really happened. but anyways they can assume what they want to if they get something from it.
Comment icon #8 Posted by 747400 13 years ago
I'm always very pleased when scientists are astonished or baffled. It shows they're doing their job properly, and admitting that they don't know everything. I think scientists should be baffled regularly. Who knows, perhaps the long-held assumptions about how they believe planets form might need a bit of a rethink, rather than it being Mars that's in error because it doesn't fit their theories.
Comment icon #9 Posted by The Silver Thong 13 years ago
Mars was hit by a very large asteroid so I wonder how much of Mars was blown away in the impact that maybe throwing off the simulation.
Comment icon #10 Posted by Cosmic2012 13 years ago
Agree with The Silver Thong. Although Marcos makes a valid suggestion. Anyone ever think, that simulations could also be wrong!?
Comment icon #11 Posted by tlsmith1138 13 years ago
I love it when scientist insist that reality is wrong because they have to be right. The picture for the word "ignorance", should be a science textbook.
Comment icon #12 Posted by The Silver Thong 13 years ago
I love it when scientist insist that reality is wrong because they have to be right. The picture for the word "ignorance", should be a science textbook. And yet you use the net and technology science created to post such a thing. When you get sick who do you go to, a faith healer or a doctor?
Comment icon #13 Posted by daavin 13 years ago
Agree with The Silver Thong. Although Marcos makes a valid suggestion. Anyone ever think, that simulations could also be wrong!? I also agree with Silver Thong, the only question about the simulations having an error in them is that wouldn't all the simulations for other planets also have that result?


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Top 10 trending mysteries
Recent news and articles