Dino drawing or mud stain: proof of creation?

I tend to think that as much as seems to make sense that artwork should not be something that needs to evolve like technology...the simple fact of the matter is that this is precisely how it did. It is easier, perhaps, if you think of it in terms of techniques. A human has pretty much the same physical skills and abilities that we have always had, however martial art techniques took millennia to develop, and continue to be developed as we learn more and more about the human body and psychology. Just because we had the physical ability to do it from the beginning does not mean that we had the c... [More]

I tend to think that as much as seems to make sense that artwork should not be something that needs to evolve like technology...the simple fact of the matter is that this is precisely how it did. It is easier, perhaps, if you think of it in terms of techniques. A human has pretty much the same physical skills and abilities that we have always had, however martial art techniques took millennia to develop, and continue to be developed as we learn more and more about the human body and psychology. Just because we had the physical ability to do it from the beginning does not mean that we had the c... [More]

Hmm... the dinosaur is different from the image next to it. The man looks very faded and white- the 'dinosaur' looks relatively new, and almost completely unscratched or aged. I could easily see someone drawing it as a joke, trying to make a stylized dinosaur in the pre-history style of drawing. It's also in Utah, an extremely relgious state. Maybe someone drew it thinking it would disprove evolution or something? you did read the part where the people who took the pics. couldnt get into the cave.

Here's the thing: I see the argument of depiction being skewed because the people didn't use scale or they weren't being photo realistic. However, if you think it thru there is an argument for the other side. How many people draw and paint? Those who have artistic talent or just anyone? Most that don't have this talent don't bother trying but those that do have talent are likely to use it. That being said, it's likely that most cave drawings which are reasonably recognizable are done by the artists of the time. Therefore they would in fact be scaled within reason and depictions would be fairly... [More]

Heaven forbid they have dinosaurs but scientists are quick to jump on the alien theory when they see weird stuff. Lol. I think it was probably done by a 5 year old cave baby. And when we are all dead we will look back and laugh at it. I can almost imagine it went down like the Mayan calender, someone does a half-assed job and thousands of years later people go ape **EDIT** over it. **Family forum, Viral.**

You may be perfectly correct... I find it interesting that the more (I don't know how to phrase it so I am using the best word I can) "Fanatsy" type concepts seem to evolve alongside other things Humans do... Not only art, but also writing. Take a look at "the Iliad" - a wonderful piece of work that deserves to be read but far from what one would call a complex and involving character piece. Characters are moved around like pieces on a chessboard in it with almost no regard to their interior mindset. That seems to echo the artwork of primitive man - which leads one to wonder if primitive man w... [More]

You do know this can be interpreted as a snake being cooked on a fire. Look a lot like a snake to me any way

I didn't read all the comments, but I'm assuming this whole charade was created to find some supposed "truth" to the creationist story. Creation Museum make their money off of "believers". Using genesis as a basis is not the best way to fund research or to do research in general. Show me the money.

I didn't read all the comments, but I'm assuming this whole charade was created to find some supposed "truth" to the creationist story. Creation Museum make their money off of "believers". Using genesis as a basis is not the best way to fund research or to do research in general. Show me the money. Aint that the truth!

You know what tells me this is not a dino? The tail. Even though people back then were very ..what we call "stylized" in their pictographs (Some theories as to why is because to show humans in the same detail as other animals was a taboo) They were actually pretty accurate in their depiction of animals. And through studies of the dinosaur bones that we have, we know that the sauropods (which this .. to the untrained naked eye looks like) did not have that long of a tail, nor did they cary it down like that. It was held straight out. Kind of like a counter balance.