Thursday, October 3, 2024
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries
You are viewing: Home > News > Science & Technology > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All ▾
Search Submit

Science & Technology

Dark energy may not actually exist at all

By T.K. Randall
June 16, 2010 · Comment icon 14 comments

Image Credit: NASA/ESA
A new study has suggested that the mysterious dark matter and energy in our universe may not actually exist at all.
Planets, stars and other recognisable componenets of our universe make up only 4 percent of the total mass with dark matter and energy accounting for the rest of it, but now this has been called in to question and scientists are trying to determine if the manner in which this has been calculated is fundamentally wrong.
Dark matter and energy, the mysterious forces thought to make up 96 per cent of the universe, may not exist according to a groundbreaking study. British scientists have claimed that the method used to calculate the make-up of the universe may be wrong.


Source: Telegraph | Comments (14)




Other news and articles
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #5 Posted by Mac E 15 years ago
I don't think dark matter exists. I have my own theory for the mass difference, which I have expressed in other threads. There are limits to what we are able to detect out in space. To try and quantitate the universe is an enormous undertaking, if possible at all. Edit for typos
Comment icon #6 Posted by Jeanine 15 years ago
Here's another perspective, from a sci-fi novel ~ “You have two choices, Mr. St. Patrick. You may join us or wither and die with the weak.” “There are never only two options, Etna.” “Positive, negative. That is all.” He flicked his hand as though his words made it so. “And neutral.” “Neutral? That is like stasis, not alive, not dead. It is powerless. It is nothing. Void.” “It is the dark matter giving form to everything. There is no such thing as a void. Even the void is made up of something. Positive and negative reactivity is not a demonstration of relativity, but the p... [More]
Comment icon #7 Posted by Bliszter 15 years ago
Very interesting article
Comment icon #8 Posted by ThePitOfReason 15 years ago
It's hard to prove what you do not understand. If anything like this is the case it's going to be a long time for science to figure it out.
Comment icon #9 Posted by SolarPlexus 15 years ago
Theyre just saying it doesnt exist because there is no input data and they dont want to bother
Comment icon #10 Posted by luzifer 15 years ago
whole universe is inside a crystal ball we will never detect what they dont want us to detect.... n we will never get outta our solar system.... who knows if the distant stars n galaxies we r taking pics of trying to find r just holograms n this is a matrix a maze.... for example we look at the world n we see different colors.... sky is kinda blue.... water is blue/greenish n of other shades.... what if it isnt what we see.... n some animal most of which r color blind see everything in black n white shades [ as the scientists say] so what if kinda we see n we learn or we know only what they/go... [More]
Comment icon #11 Posted by DONTEATUS 15 years ago
whole universe is inside a crystal ball we will never detect what they dont want us to detect.... n we will never get outta our solar system.... who knows if the distant stars n galaxies we r taking pics of trying to find r just holograms n this is a matrix a maze.... for example we look at the world n we see different colors.... sky is kinda blue.... water is blue/greenish n of other shades.... what if it isnt what we see.... n some animal most of which r color blind see everything in black n white shades [ as the scientists say] so what if kinda we see n we learn or we know only what they/go... [More]
Comment icon #12 Posted by DieChecker 15 years ago
But... It has to exist. Enough people on these forums with Bachelors degrees have said so, so it has to be true. (Sarcasm) I don't think we know everything yet. I don't believe Dark Matter or Dark Energy has been physically located yet, so I could be it isn't really there.
Comment icon #13 Posted by ThePitOfReason 15 years ago
It's like attempting to prove the human body has a soul. That is how hard it is going to be to prove. But ............ Observational evidence The first person to provide evidence and infer the presence of dark matter was Swiss astrophysicist Fritz Zwicky, of the California Institute of Technology in 1933.[6] He applied the virial theorem to the Coma cluster of galaxies and obtained evidence of unseen mass. Zwicky estimated the cluster's total mass based on the motions of galaxies near its edge and compared that estimate to one based on the number of galaxies and total brightness of the cluster... [More]
Comment icon #14 Posted by DONTEATUS 14 years ago
Great read! But the greatest minds on our planet cannot come to a conclusion on this ! Like Hawking Radiation,String Theroy,and the Likes! If we survive the next twenty years I`ll be very surprised. As for the Cosmos Its got a tad bit longer to be around If you believe the current est. 30 Billion years,That in its self seems like a very Man made number to me. Sorta Like the few gallons of Oil BP said was only leaking outta the Gulf Spill ! Now thats some dark energy !


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Recent news and articles