Thursday, May 1, 2025
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries Support Us
You are viewing: Home > News > Science & Technology > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All ▾
Search Submit

Science & Technology

The higher you are, the faster you age

By T.K. Randall
September 24, 2010 · Comment icon 103 comments

Image Credit: Morio, Wikimedia Commons
Extremely precise timepieces have been used to prove that you age faster the higher off the ground you are.
New research has shown that if you lived your life on the second floor of a building you would age faster by 900 billionths of a second. Its not much, but for the first time scientists have been able to actually demonstrate that there is a difference.
Researchers have demonstrated one of Einstein's theories of relativity - that the further away from the Earth you are, the faster time passes works even on a human scale. That means – even though the differences are tiny – you really will age faster if you live on the top floor of a skyscraper than in a bungalow.


Source: Telegraph | Comments (103)




Other news and articles
Our latest videos Visit us on YouTube
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #94 Posted by Stellar 15 years ago
At the "virtual" but still slightly less speed of light every thing comes to a virtual standstill - lets say standstill for convenience. How would your observation work as even if we are asleep body metabolism etc continues at near normal pace. How would a human body cope with no blood circulation per se? At that point, the body, to the outside observer, is "frozen" in time. It does not age nor metabolise because those processes are also at a standstill.
Comment icon #95 Posted by antonT 15 years ago
At that point, the body, to the outside observer, is "frozen" in time. It does not age nor metabolise because those processes are also at a standstill. Can we thus definitely conclude that the time spent in space by the astronaut twin was spent in slow motion from an earthly frame of reference - the reference of reality? Does this conflict with the perception engendered by school science text books on the student? One may try to resolve the the idea of slow motion by saying it happened in the earth frame of reference only and that the perception of normality was maintained by the astronaut twi... [More]
Comment icon #96 Posted by Stellar 15 years ago
Can we thus definitely conclude that the time spent in space by the astronaut twin was spent in slow motion from an earthly frame of reference - the reference of reality? Does this conflict with the perception engendered by school science text books on the student? One may try to resolve the the idea of slow motion by saying it happened in the earth frame of reference only and that the perception of normality was maintained by the astronaut twin. But how can an observer in the spacecraft's FOR percieve the astronaut twin's behaviour as normal when the twin is virtually frozen in time?. Our bra... [More]
Comment icon #97 Posted by antonT 15 years ago
There is *no* change in metabolism. Thats the fundamental aspect youre not grasping, and until you grasp that, further discussion is pointless. But the clock in the spaceship shows that time has slowed down. If this is the case metabolic time must have also slowed down. Does this not suggest that for one twin to be younger than the other time must have passed in slow motion for the twin concerned?. For one twin to be younger than the other he must have existed in slow motion in relation to his brother. But this is so simplistic - simplistic because it's like saying night must follow day - some... [More]
Comment icon #98 Posted by sepulchrave 15 years ago
But the clock in the spaceship shows that time has slowed down. If this is the case metabolic time must have also slowed down. Exactly. EVERYTHING slows down. "Metabolic time" is only measured relative to one's environment. If, according to a different frame of reference, one's environment has slowed down, then one's "metabolic time" has also slowed down; but, relative to that individual, everything in one's local environment - including one's self - appears normal. Does this not suggest that for one twin to be younger than the other time must have passed in slow motion for the twin concerned?... [More]
Comment icon #99 Posted by antonT 15 years ago
Exactly. EVERYTHING slows down. "Metabolic time" is only measured relative to one's environment. If, according to a different frame of reference, one's environment has slowed down, then one's "metabolic time" has also slowed down; but, relative to that individual, everything in one's local environment - including one's self - appears normal. You still think that a person can "tell" if they are in slow motion. They can't. Everything inside your spaceship appears to behave normally, it is only things outside the spaceship, that can only be experienced indirectly, that appear to be skewed. There ... [More]
Comment icon #100 Posted by Stellar 15 years ago
There is only one element of special relativity that I'm not happy about and this is the question of reality in other words the earthly frame of reference. I am happy with every thing else. In the above sentence you agree that everything is in slow motion from an earthly frame of reference. You say everything inside the spaceships appears to behave normally. I say how, when our brains are wired to earthly criteria, possibly can we think we are behaving normally when, travelling at the near speed of light and our bodies are virtually pertified in time? Because our brains are also "moving" in "s... [More]
Comment icon #101 Posted by antonT 15 years ago
To terminate my contribution to this thread I will refer back to the original post and gravity to which the same arguments would apply I suppose as I am told that velocity and gravity both affect time dialation in the same way. I must say I am somewhat astonished to discover that Special Relativity relies on and predicts that in order to get younger one has to exist in slow motion. Surely this is like saying, if one does not die one will keep on living, isn't it? Quite amazing!
Comment icon #102 Posted by cluey 15 years ago
At the "virtual" but still slightly less speed of light every thing comes to a virtual standstill - lets say standstill for convenience. How would your observation work as even if we are asleep body metabolism etc continues at near normal pace. How would a human body cope with no blood circulation per se? Wouldn't one die from the infection from the bacteria in one's gut for instance? basically....no!!!!!.....5 people could eat food with the potential for a gut infection............only 1 may even get sick........it is not the same for all
Comment icon #103 Posted by sepulchrave 15 years ago
To terminate my contribution to this thread I will refer back to the original post and gravity to which the same arguments would apply I suppose as I am told that velocity and gravity both affect time dialation in the same way. You've misunderstood something then. Acceleration and gravity affect the passage of time the same way. Relative velocity affects the appearance of time dilation (from another reference frame). I must say I am somewhat astonished to discover that Special Relativity relies on and predicts that in order to get younger one has to exist in slow motion. Surely this is like sa... [More]


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Recent news and articles