Monday, January 25, 2021
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help    |   Cookie Policy    |   Privacy Policy    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos
Find: in

Musk: 'Starship 2.0 could be twice as big'


Posted on Wednesday, 4 September, 2019 | Comment icon 2 comments

Musk is certainly not short on ambition. Image Credit: SpaceX / Elon Musk
Elon Musk has hinted that SpaceX's next-generation interplanetary spacecraft could be absolutely huge.
Designed to serve as the reusable second stage of the Big Falcon Rocket (BFR), Starship (1.0) will be capable of carrying astronauts and cargo all the way to the surface of Mars.

The spacecraft has undergone several name changes since it was first announced, having previously transitioned from Mars Colonial Transporter (MCT) to Interplanetary Transport System (ITS).

SpaceX conducted its latest free-flight test of the Starship Hopper test vehicle back on August 27th, thus bringing the company one step closer to launching a full-scale prototype into orbit.

Not content with stopping there however, Musk has been contemplating another, even larger vehicle.
This 'Starship 2.0', he maintains, would be twice the size of the current spacecraft.

This would make it a whopping 240 meters tall and 18 meters wide with support for payloads of up to 800,000kg. Such a launch vehicle would need 60 Raptor engines just to get off the ground.

Of course it's still very early days to be contemplating Starship's successor, however it is always interesting to learn what Musk is thinking when it comes to the future of spaceflight.

It remains to be seen whether or not things will proceed the way he predicts.

Source: Universe Today | Comments (2)


Tags: Starship, SpaceX


Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #1 Posted by Jon the frog on 4 September, 2019, 17:39
For me the next generation of space ship will be assembled in space, with an orbital space-hub receiving flight from earth for transferring payload and people. They need to push for a space base soon. Moon with less gravity can be an interesting place to build some kind of space hub too.
Comment icon #2 Posted by highdesert50 on 4 September, 2019, 21:31
Back in the 1970s, the L5 Society recommended construction of a space colony at the L5 Lagrange point. L4 and L5, being stable gravitational points, do not require fuel expenditure to maintain equilibrium yet provide for some interesting opportunities, such as what you suggest. Perhaps, now that we are becoming more adept at reusable orbital machinery, this might again be conceptually explored.


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


  On the forums
Forum posts:
Forum topics:
Members:

6847949
285423
187141

 
ISS records 'blue jet' lightning from space
1-25-2021
Scientists have recorded footage of a spectacular natural phenomenon that is only clearly visible from space.
Looking back at Darwin's 'abominable mystery'
1-24-2021
The famed naturalist was haunted by one evolutionary mystery that proved too difficult for even him to solve.
Does this photo show a panther in Australia ?
1-24-2021
A Melbourne carpenter has posted up a photograph he took of a large black cat near the Mornington Peninsula.
Quarter of all bee species missing since 1990s
1-23-2021
A new study has revealed that 25% of all known bee species have not been seen in as much as 30 years.
Stories & Experiences
The voice of something not human
11-17-2020 | Baldwin Hills, Los Angeles
 
Shadow figure demon ?
11-14-2020 | USA
 
Ghost following me
9-18-2020 | Iowa
 
Mysterious glowing cube
8-23-2020 | Alabama
 
Black blob in my room/bed
7-23-2020 | Powell,TN U.S.
 
Transparent levitating ball
7-14-2020 | Santa Rosa, California
 
 
 
Grim reaper-like visitation
6-16-2020 | Canada
 
My monster catfish story
6-15-2020 | Dallas texas
 

         More stories | Send us your story
 
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.712 Unexplained-Mysteries.com (c) 2001-2021
Terms   |   Privacy Policy   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ