Wednesday, April 30, 2025
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries Support Us
You are viewing: Home > News > The UFO Phenomenon > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All ▾
Search Submit

The UFO Phenomenon

NASA astronaut's 1965 UFO sighting was solved many years later

By T.K. Randall
July 8, 2024 · Comment icon 24 comments
Gemini 4.
McDivitt took this image of fellow astronaut Ed White during Gemini 4. Image Credit: NASA
Astronaut Jim McDivitt had reported seeing an object shaped like a beer can outside the Gemini 4 capsule.
When it comes to UFO sightings, it is often said that astronauts and pilots make particularly good witnesses thanks to their stellar reputation, attention to detail and no-nonsense approach.

When astronaut Jim McDivitt spotted a strange object during his flight into space aboard NASA's Gemini 4 mission all the way back in 1965, therefore, people understandably took notice.

"At the time I saw it, I said there was something out in front of me or outside the spacecraft that I couldn't identify and I never have been able to identify it, and I don't think anybody ever will," he said during a television interview around 10 years after the sighting.

"We were in drifting flight and my partner, Ed White, was asleep. I couldn't see anything out in front of me except just the black sky."

"And it was rotating around, I noticed something out in front that was a white cylindrical shape with a white pole sticking it out of one corner of it - it looked like a beer can with a smooth pencil sticking out. I grabbed two cameras and took pictures of it."
"As the sun shone on the window, I could no longer see out and the thing just disappeared."

The photos he took ended up inconclusive and blurry and did not seem to help solve the mystery.

It wasn't until years later that McDivitt finally learned what he had seen that day.

"And really what it was, was a reflection of the bolts in the windows," he said in 1999.

"The windows were made up of about three or four or five panes of glass, so that if one got broken we still had some pressure integrity."

"And these little things, when the Sun shined on them right, they'd multiply the images off the different panes. And I'm quite sure that that's what this thing was."

Source: Mirror.co.uk | Comments (24)




Other news and articles
Our latest videos Visit us on YouTube
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #15 Posted by ChrLzs 9 months ago
Earl, may I ask if you are having memory lapses..?  Several of the things you claimed above are false, and they have been explained in some detail in previous threads on Unexplained Mysteries.   No major harm if you are are having memory struggles - I'm getting old too, and am often surprised when I do the preliminary research, to find that I had completely forgotten stuff that was comprehensively covered in old threads.  That's why it pays to do the investigating *before* you make the claims.......... For now, let's just focus on ONE aspect.  Earlier, you referred to 16 pilots having see... [More]
Comment icon #16 Posted by MrAnderson 9 months ago
Do you want every pilot to come forward and describe what they have witnessed? That's new! You are very demanding as it seems! Some pilots come forward and describe their sightings and experiences. Some others say nothing because they don't want any publicity (negative) and they don't want to put their reputations and careers at risk. Even if all pilots come forward to describe what they saw (if we assume all of them have seen it) then your next argument it to dismiss and deny what they said they saw and argue they don't have evidence or they were confused and they didn't see what they have de... [More]
Comment icon #17 Posted by 9 months ago
1) I never said that was intent. However, you can't deny the fact he's made a living off of it post- military. 2) YES, that is huge red flag to me as an investigator and inspector. There would, and should be corresponding reports from the pilots in the squadron. Evidence by corroboration. So, as of now we have very vocal person and only one other alleged to have witnessed it has a similar (but not exactly the same) account. 3) In this discussion, don't care about Mr. Grusch. His whole deal is a discussion better fit for another thread. 4) Ok, you acknowledge that my honest questions do have me... [More]
Comment icon #18 Posted by ChrLzs 9 months ago
Indeed.  It's almost as if the 'encounters' were part of a training exercise...    And what a coincidence, these WERE training exercises, using initially uncalibrated equipment, and persons who were unfamiliar with that equipment's use.  Also.. (just another coincidence...) the exercises happened very close to San Clemente Island.  That would be this San Clemente Island, the one where they develop and test drone technology.  Here's an example of their activities, from 2019.  Apart from the very obvious possibilities like submersible drones and surface-to-air submarine launched missiles ... [More]
Comment icon #19 Posted by Hazzard 9 months ago
It wouldnt be the first time they used the UFO crowd in this sinister way. ?
Comment icon #20 Posted by ChrLzs 9 months ago
More here...  and I quote: Interestingly, the article author believes that some or all of the drones in the 2019 incident may have been Chinese drones, launched from the inevitable 'trawlers' that hang around near US training events.  I recommend that you visit the page, and also note the images of the types of drones likely involved.  Tictacs, anyone?   And from the Navy itself: Dear reader, have you seen any cites and quotes like the above coming from the claimants?  NOT ONCE have they mentioned or debated San Clemente Island...    
Comment icon #21 Posted by Earl.Of.Trumps 9 months ago
So what? Why does making money make him an evil liar??  we've gone over this before. A physics professor writes a physics text... TO MAKE MONEY. so much for that argument.   Obviously, I don't know the procedure and have no idea whether those other pilots filed reports or not, I simply assume that they did. And I could be wrong.   Again, I do not know the procedure. those other stations could have made reports but not for the public. no idea.   I still think that this whole "Go Fast" is an orchestration. I don't blame you for being suspicious.
Comment icon #22 Posted by Earl.Of.Trumps 9 months ago
Well then  it is you that should do your research. I said 16, *another poster* barked it down to 4, all though I have no idea how he arrived at that niumber
Comment icon #23 Posted by Hazzard 9 months ago
What in the actual F ?  I just told you how!!   Here...  
Comment icon #24 Posted by 9 months ago
1) Motive 2) I know the procedure, that's why i question the absence of information. 3) I know the procedure, that's why I question the absence of information.   I'm just curious and in some respects yes, suspicious. 


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Recent news and articles