Sunday, October 6, 2024
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries
You are viewing: Home > News > Science & Technology > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All ▾
Search Submit

Science & Technology

Findings of major new study into origins of Covid pandemic published

By T.K. Randall
September 20, 2024 · Comment icon 26 comments

Where did Covid originate ? Image Credit: Pixabay / Herney
The international study aimed to get to the bottom of the pandemic and determine precisely where it had started.
The coronavirus pandemic, which spread far and wide back in early 2020, has since been the subject of intense controversy, scrutiny and debate - especially with regard to where it originated.

While most people agree that it began in China, there has been a great deal of disagreement over whether the virus had started in a wet market or if it had escaped from a laboratory.

Now, according to the findings of a major new international study, scientists have concluded that the virus most likely did originate at a wet market in Wuhan, China.

The study authors found traces of Covid-19 in genetic samples taken from animals sold at market stalls in Wuhan back in 2019, thus proving that it existed in the wet markets at that time.

"This adds another layer to the accumulating evidence that all points to the same scenario: that infected animals were introduced into the market in mid-to late November 2019, which sparked the pandemic," said lead study author Kristian Andersen from Scripps Research.
Several animal species were thought to be carrying the virus, including raccoon dogs, masked palm civets, hoary bamboo rats and Mayalan porcupines.

Many of the earliest known cases of human infection were workers from these markets.

The study highlights the threat still posed by wet markets in the country.

"This is the most risky thing we can do - take wild animals that are teeming with viruses and then play with fire by bringing them into contact with humans living in the heart of big cities, whose population densities make it easy for these viruses to take hold," said study co-author Michael Worobey of the University of Arizona.

In other words, unless changes are made, the same thing could happen again in the future.

Source: Mail Online | Comments (26)




Other news and articles
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #17 Posted by josellama2000 5 days ago
for your information, pandemics are directly correlated to population density and population migration, as i clearly explained. Otherwise, they will be only local diseases. Therefore, your attempt to refuse by using the population difference is not relevant, unless you missed to mention more details about your assumption.
Comment icon #18 Posted by OverSword 5 days ago
Pandemics are caused by jets.  Get a grip.  We are not a problem.  Well not all of us anyways 
Comment icon #19 Posted by josellama2000 5 days ago
Yeah sure. Playing/kidding is good strategy for some people when out of arguments. I saw it several times. Showing that your own words are nothing for you, so other people words in a discussion will also mean nothing? That is not the way discussions work, my friend. So in other words, i tried to say that the real solution for pandemics is to reduce the population and respect nature. Medicines and vaccines are only temporal, as more pandemics will likely happen.  
Comment icon #20 Posted by OverSword 5 days ago
You are right.  If there are few people living far away from each other there would likely be no pandemic.  And if Bilbo had stayed in the shire Sauron would not have allied with Saruman. 
Comment icon #21 Posted by josellama2000 5 days ago
I cant respond to that as i promise not to talk anymore about the reasoning scheme of others. Even if it implies not giving any positive as i receive from others.  
Comment icon #22 Posted by OverSword 5 days ago
My reasoning is that pandemics do not affect the overall population and so for us to be a problem as you say we are and pandemics to be a soft solution as you say they are then they should result in a lower global population.  There were more people born than died every day of the pandemic so your assumptions are incorrect.
Comment icon #23 Posted by josellama2000 5 days ago
This situation is analogous to the functioning of the U.S. economy. While we have not yet experienced a recession, largely due to significant injections of fiat currency and debt (often referred to as a "vaccine" for the economy), this does suggest that a more severe recession could be on the horizon. The underlying issue stems from flawed monetary and expending policies (just like irresponsible population grow). There are saving us from the recession, but sentencing our children at the same time. In other words, just because a pandemic may not have resulted in as many deaths as previous pande... [More]
Comment icon #24 Posted by OverSword 5 days ago
You mean the pandemic that we gave ourselves from a bat disease?  Yep, we may make something worse next time.
Comment icon #25 Posted by josellama2000 5 days ago
exactly sir. I could be zoonotic, artificial, or a naturally evolved one. It is just a matter of time.
Comment icon #26 Posted by OverSword 5 days ago
Could be an asteroid.


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Top 10 trending mysteries
Recent news and articles