Saturday, April 18, 2026
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries Support Us
You are viewing: Home > News > The UFO Phenomenon > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All ▾
Search Submit

The UFO Phenomenon

New US government hearing on UFOs to be held next week

By T.K. Randall
September 5, 2025 · Comment icon 55 comments

Image: Home of the U.S. Congress
Credit: Jessica Rodriguez Rivas / CC BY-SA 4.0 (adapted)
The meeting will include multiple witnesses and experts related to the field of unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP).
UFOs continue to remain a major talking point these days and many government officials are unwilling to let the matter drop, instead pushing for full disclosure of any and all UFO-related material.

Now, according to reports, a new hearing on the subject will take place on Tuesday of next week.

Entitled "Restoring Public Trust Through UAP Transparency and Whistleblower Protection", the hearing will be headed up by Rep. Anna Paulina Luna of the House Oversight and Government Reform's Task Force on the Declassification of Federal Secrets.

"The American people deserve maximum transparency from the federal government on sightings, acquisitions, and examinations of UAPs and whether they pose a potential threat to Americans' safety," she said.
"Whistleblowers who provide details on spending information and policies and procedures regarding the classification and declassification of UAPs should be able to do so without retribution."

Speaking at the hearing will be multiple UAP witnesses including Air Force veterans Jeffrey Nuccetelli and Dylan Borland, as well as Navy veteran Alexandro Wiggins.

Journalist George Knapp will also be attending.

The hearing will be streamed live from 10:00 a.m. EDT on Tuesday, September 9th.

Source: The Hill | Comments (55)




Other news and articles
Our latest videos Visit us on YouTube
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #46 Posted by Piney 7 months ago
You contribute nothing of value....?
Comment icon #47 Posted by papageorge1 7 months ago
More about me and not the topic, eh.
Comment icon #48 Posted by XenoFish 7 months ago
He never has and obviously never will. I've seen the quality, quantity, and consistency of his post. So it must be true. 
Comment icon #49 Posted by Resume 7 months ago
When you post crap like this, what do you expect? No, you use your fee-fees to confirm it.  You pretend to examine evidence but what you actually do is read anecdotes and employ an emotional coin flip to decide whether or not to believe it.  Anecdotes are **** evidence: you can't test them, you can't scientifically falsify them, and a million anecdotes are just a million pieces of **** evidence.  Anyone can tell a story, and a short perusal of your posts reveal you are anxious to believe a lot of them as long as they confirm what you already believe.  You are not a human lie detector, you ... [More]
Comment icon #50 Posted by papageorge1 7 months ago
Hmm, another post about me and not the topic.
Comment icon #51 Posted by Resume 7 months ago
No, it's a post questioning the methodology you employ to examine truth claims about the natural world.   You typed: Which of course explains nothing, which is why one poster questions the value of your postings.  I detailed my own misgivings about your posts, detailing their lack of anything approaching logic but rather weighted towards emotion, and thus, valueless.
Comment icon #52 Posted by papageorge1 7 months ago
Instead of just general cheap attacks like 'lack of anything approaching logic', try presenting specific cases and examples and reasons showing logical mistakes and errors. That would improve the quality of your posts and raise the conversation level of this forum.
Comment icon #53 Posted by Hazzard 7 months ago
If you are serious about raising the level of conversation, start by holding your own posts to that same standard. Pick a case - any case you like - present the full context, and explain why it holds up under scrutiny, not just why you believe it. Thats the only way to have a fair look at the reasoning, spot any logical gaps, and see whether the case actually holds up.
Comment icon #54 Posted by papageorge1 7 months ago
I do that when the topic is about a specific case.
Comment icon #55 Posted by Resume 7 months ago
Certainly.   Any post in which you apply your ridiculous papameter. Pick one, your strongest argument, any one, and then explain what reliable, replicable, demonstrable metric you employed to arrive at the percentage you claimed. Pick your very best, one that relies on the laws of logic, and not your emotional opinion of an anecdote. ETA: See post #54.


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Recent news and articles