A particularly deadly weapon may have once been employed by the Roman army during the siege of Pompeii.
It's certainly an interesting thought exercise to imagine what the Romans could have achieved if they had invented firearms, but while they never developed gunpowder weapons, they likely did have access to at least one early example of a repeating mechanical weapon.
In a new study, researchers examined curious marks found on walls in the ruins of Pompeii - the ancient Roman town that was destroyed and covered in ash after the eruption of Mt. Vesuvius.
These small, square-shaped impact marks were thought to be a good match for a weapon known as a 'polybolos' - essentially a repeating device capable of firing dart-like projectiles one after the other.
In particular, the pattern of the marks seemed to point to the use of such a device.
Described as a sort of primitive 'machine gun', this ferocious weapon would have seemed particularly daunting to the town's defenders who would have likely never seen anything like it before.
It was originally an ancient Greek invention devised by Dionysius of Alexandria.
The marks on the wall don't seem to match any other known projectiles used at that time, though it is important to emphasize that it hasn't been conclusive proven that they were made by a polybolos.
Even so, the study emphasizes the sheer ingenuity of the people from this time and shows that, even without gunpowder, physics can produce some seriously impressive weapons.
The Romans were unparalleled at dealing death with cruelty. That's why I often use the expression "going full Roman" on an enemy. The whole "stick in the blade and twist it while looking into their eyes" vibe. If a nation has to spend its blood and treasure to defeat an enemy who starts a fight, make it so painful that they will never come back for more. Looks like two MEUs and around a thousand trigger pullers from the 82nd are headed to the region to potentially seize Kharg Island. Unfortunately, there are around 8K citizens there who'll become our responsibility after security is es... [More]
My biggest concern is that if Trump is pushed into a corner, he may use a nuclear weapon. I don't think the guys playing with full deck. But yeah, I suspect that. Khrag Island is the objective at this point or they would not have brought in the marines with an additional force of soldiers from the 82nd airborne. If they do deploy ground troops like you say, I hope they can't keep the casualties to a very very minimum but there's no guarantee. I'm starting to think that President Trump may have bitten off more than he can chew, I don't think that secretary of defense Hegseth is the right person... [More]
No US president, including Trump, will ever make first use of nukes. Despite opinions to the contrary, I don't believe he's a madman or mentally unbalanced. He understands that Iran is a dangerous, very real and present danger to America. The Presidents from the Ds have avoided confronting Iran's danger and they were only a couple weeks of assembling nukes. Just like Hamas, Iran will never give up but they don't have to for us to end them as a threat, especially a nuclear threat. Iran will throw everything they have left against troops once they're dug in on Kharg. The aviation eleme... [More]
You blame the democrats for the current situation in Iran, when in reality it's been going on since at least 2000. President Bush didn't solve the problem, and trump only made it worst in his first term when he pulled out of the Nuclear deal with Iran. On the subject of Trumps personality disorder and subsequent instability we must agree to disagree respectfully. As far as the Laser-guided rockets are concerned, I am not aware of them, or half of the other new equipment and munitions.
Please Login or Register to post a comment.