Tuesday, December 6, 2016
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help   RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos
Find: in

Mystery of the 100-million-year old hammer


Posted on Wednesday, 9 April, 2014 | Comment icon 72 comments

The hammer was found near London, Texas. Image Credit: CC BY-SA 3.0 Rolintt
A mysterious hammer was discovered in Texas in 1934 embedded inside a rock several million years old.
The peculiar object is an example of an out of place artifact (oopart), a term that is generally applied to the discovery of a modern object that seems to have originated from a time period that pre-dates its invention.

The 'London Hammer' has been the subject of several tests and a lot of controversy since it was first discovered in Texas by a hiker in the 1930s. An analysis conducted at the Battelle Laboratory in Ohio, the same place that NASA sent some of the moon rocks for testing, was said to have determined that the hammer possessed unusual metallurgical properties.

The question of the hammer's age however is one that has divided researchers. Carl Baugh, who currently possesses the artifact, maintains that the hammer is literally prehistoric and that its handle has turned to coal over the ages. He also writes that fossils within the surrounding rock "retain fine detail, indicating that they were not reworked, but part of the original formation," suggesting that both the rock and the hammer are from the same time period.

Skeptic Glen J. Kuban however believes differently. In a 1997 paper he claimed that all testing on the object had been conducted privately and not at the Battelle Laboratory as had been originally implied. He also maintained that inconclusive test results had dated the hammer back just 700 years and that Baugh had delayed a full carbon dating test because he didn't want to be proven wrong.

So does the London Hammer really date back several million years or is it simply a relic from the recent past ? To date the true age and origins of this enigmatic tool continue to remain a mystery.

Source: The Epoch Times | Comments (72)

Tags: Out of Place Artifacts


 
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #63 Posted by Rose-Red Howler on 17 July, 2014, 10:57
There's a few of these objects found to be millions of years old. I'm starting to wonder where did we come from or was someone here before us or is there going to be time travel?????
Comment icon #64 Posted by Harte on 17 July, 2014, 12:22
Carbon dating is one of the most evil and inaccurate technology mankind and science has ever come up with. There you go; i said it again! Oop parts are just simple proofs and this huge misbelieve...dinosaurs living 300 million years ago ? Wth? Yes, "Wth?" indeed. The first dinosaurs arose 230 million years ago. So, "Wth?" Harte
Comment icon #65 Posted by 95-Nasty on 17 July, 2014, 14:13
ever notice how everything that is interesting is also controversial? can't get a straight answer to anything. very frustrating. It's like, why read? whatever you find that is interesting, already has twenty authorities saying "FAKE"!! I completely agree with you, well said
Comment icon #66 Posted by stereologist on 17 July, 2014, 16:04
ever notice how everything that is interesting is also controversial? can't get a straight answer to anything. very frustrating. It's like, why read? whatever you find that is interesting, already has twenty authorities saying "FAKE"!! Even in science things are controversial. An example is the issue at CERN with the supraluminal, faster than light speed, neutrinos. The people at CERN are pretty smart and know that supraluminal claims come and go every few years. it took a while, but the problem was related to a bad connection of a cable. The supraluminal issue was controversial. That is the w... [More]
Comment icon #67 Posted by sargo on 17 August, 2014, 15:09
Due to natural processes forests are slowly converted to coal. Therefore, it is completely impossible that a wooden stick would look like the one in picture after 100 million years. Also the hammer does not fit the rock so well as it should and it seems that the stick has been broken to put it inside the rock.
Comment icon #68 Posted by Earl.Of.Trumps on 18 August, 2014, 1:23
I'm a bigfoot fancier that thinks the creature exists, but I refuse to look at a phony film of a BF and say it is real to make myself happy. My eye is pretty good, and if the BF footage looks phony to me, I say it's phony. Very simple When I look at that hammer in the rock, it smells real to me. The sediment that left a yellow hue all around the hammer and rock, the broken handle that is embedded, it just looks real to me. If it could ever be proven to be real, then what? that is the real question. how to explain it.
Comment icon #69 Posted by stereologist on 18 August, 2014, 1:40
I'm a bigfoot fancier that thinks the creature exists, but I refuse to look at a phony film of a BF and say it is real to make myself happy. My eye is pretty good, and if the BF footage looks phony to me, I say it's phony. Very simple When I look at that hammer in the rock, it smells real to me. The sediment that left a yellow hue all around the hammer and rock, the broken handle that is embedded, it just looks real to me. If it could ever be proven to be real, then what? that is the real question. how to explain it. The hammer of course is real. It is a real hammer, but not an old one. It has... [More]
Comment icon #70 Posted by Earl.Of.Trumps on 18 August, 2014, 1:55
The hammer of course is real. It is a real hammer, but not an old one. It has become encrusted with rock which can form in a short period of time. The problem here is that the creationist with it has assigned a date to the hammer that is not warranted. The hammer was found in an area with rock dated to something like 100Ma. The hammer was not found in a rock layer. It was found loose. It was found loose with some minerals encrusted on it. The date of the hammer cannot be assigned to the nearest rock. Button Bay in Vermont has been the site of many concretion finds. They are even on display in ... [More]
Comment icon #71 Posted by stereologist on 18 August, 2014, 2:29
Sure looks like the hammer was embedded into the rock to me. Maybe I should check my glasses? Now if someone faked that they did one hell of a job. Like I say the yellow hue is consistent throughout, rock or hammer. That is pretty hard to fake. The hammer was never imbedded in bedrock. The hammer is encrusted with minerals. It is covered by a concretion which can form in only a few years as evidenced by them forming on roots. Pieces of trash have been encrusted in a few years. It is not a matter of checking glasses, but realizing that the material on the hammer is recent. The fact that the col... [More]
Comment icon #72 Posted by Hanslune on 18 August, 2014, 2:30
A mining tool left in a limestone cave will be dripped on and covered with a concretion, rather common. Full report on that silly thing http://paleo.cc/paluxy/hammer.htm


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


  On the forums
Forum posts:
Forum topics:
Members:

5825195
263538
164302

 
Mystery surrounds Australia's Min Min Lights
12-6-2016
Strange balls of light have puzzled visitors and locals alike in Western Queensland for over a century.
Trip to the Moon could be available by 2026
12-5-2016
Moon Express is hoping to be able to send people on trips to the Moon within as little as ten years.
AI predicts the future by watching videos
12-5-2016
An artificial intelligence is learning how to anticipate what is going to happen in the next few seconds.
Virgin Galactic test flight proves a success
12-5-2016
Richard Branson's fledgling space tourism firm is back on track following a fatal crash two years ago.
Featured book
 
By Toryn Chapman
Campbell Mackenzie is a successful lawyer with occasional feelings of déjà vu. There's just one problem, though - it's not déjà vu.
Featured Videos
Gallery icon 
Indestructible coating ?
Posted 12-6-2016 | 0 comments
A look at polyurea, an elastomer that can make objects extremely difficult to damage.
 
World's longest shout
Posted 12-5-2016 | 1 comment
Christian Kinner from Germany managed to shout for over 43 seconds non-stop.
 
Top 10 facts about James Webb Telescope
Posted 12-4-2016 | 0 comments
A look at the upcoming orbital observatory and what it will see in the depths of space.
 
Jumping widowbirds
Posted 12-3-2016 | 2 comments
These male widowbirds are competing to see which of them can jump the highest.
 
Why do we like shiny things ?
Posted 12-2-2016 | 7 comments
Why do we seem to be intrinsically drawn from an early age to shiny objects ?
 
 View: More videos
Stories & Experiences
Not my daughter
12-2-2016 | Kansas USA
 
Curious cat
12-2-2016 | Australia
 
My ball lightning story
11-12-2016 | Kane, PA
 
My doppelganger story
11-12-2016 | Levittown, PA
 
The same dream
11-12-2016 | Pennsylvania
 
Paranormal activity ?
11-4-2016 | England
 
ESP experiences
11-4-2016 | United States
 
Witnessing hyperspeed?
10-13-2016 | United States
 
Auntie doppelganger
10-13-2016 | United States
 
Men in Black encounters
10-13-2016 | Canada
 

         More stories | Send us your story
 
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.7 Unexplained-Mysteries.com 2001-2015
Privacy Policy and Disclaimer   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ