Sunday, January 22, 2017
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help   RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos
Find: in

Russia's $2.8B moon landing plans revealed


Posted on Tuesday, 5 August, 2014 | Comment icon 18 comments

Russia is heading to the moon. Image Credit: NASA/Dennis M. Davidson
Russia is planning an extensive series of missions with the ultimate goal of landing humans on the moon.
Landing a cosmonaut on the lunar surface has been a dream of Russian scientists since the 1960s during which the world's best known space race ended with Apollo 11's historic landing in 1969.

Now Russia is set to try again and this time to be the first to set a human on the moon since the original Apollo program. The first phase will involve the sending of several unmanned probes over the next few years beginning with Luna-25 in 2016 which will land at the moon's south pole.

Two more missions, expected to launch in 2018 and 2019, will then see an orbiter and a second lander arriving at the moon in an effort to hunt for water ice.

Speaking at the COSPAR Scientific Assembly in Moscow on Sunday, Igor Mitrofanov of the Russian Academy of Sciences' Space Research Institute revealed that these missions are an important step as they will provide the opportunity to "learn to conduct the Moon landing all over again."

"An estimated cost of one project aimed at the development of an automatic lunar station is 10 billion rubles (about $280 million)," he said. "The project is to be completed in five or six years. The manned lunar mission will cost ten times more."

Source: Ria Novosti | Comments (18)

Tags: Russia, Moon


 
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #9 Posted by Noteverythingisaconspiracy on 5 August, 2014, 16:47
A 2,8 billion $ budget does seem awfully small for a manned lunar mission. While the Soyuz can obviously be used for a manned lunar mission (that was what it was originally designed for) they don't have a heavy rocket or a lunar lander. Developing those will take a lot of money and time. I am not saying that they can't do it (I think they can), but the budget does look unrealistic to me. The unmanned probes looks very interesting though. Especially drilling for water at the lunar south pole.
Comment icon #10 Posted by seeder on 5 August, 2014, 16:49
From the link... An estimated cost of one project aimed at the development of an automatic lunar station is 10 billion rubles (about $280 million). The project is to be completed in five or six years. The manned lunar mission will cost ten times more,” Mitrofanov told reporters during the COSPAR Scientific Assembly in Moscow. A 2,8 billion $ budget does seem awfully small for a manned lunar mission. While the Soyuz can obviously be used for a manned lunar mission (that was what it was originally designed for) they don't have a heavy rocket or a lunar lander. Developing those will take a lot of... [More]
Comment icon #11 Posted by skookum on 5 August, 2014, 18:11
So they have found a way past the Van Allen belt which they supported as proof the NASA moon landings were faked?
Comment icon #12 Posted by StRoostifer on 5 August, 2014, 18:12
This is very cool. I wish them well and hope they succeed. Small problem. Someone has beaten them to it. https://www.google.c...-JmwtBr7MfQCBKA Sorry, I'm on a giggle tablet that doesn't let me post vids.
Comment icon #13 Posted by Noteverythingisaconspiracy on 5 August, 2014, 19:08
So they have found a way past the Van Allen belt which they supported as proof the NASA moon landings were faked? When did the Russians ever say that the moonlandings were faked ? Hint: they didn't !
Comment icon #14 Posted by SaraT on 6 August, 2014, 11:34
Remember this is Russia we're talking about. They might be able to get the humans there, but not necessarily get them back.
Comment icon #15 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf on 6 August, 2014, 11:59
Remember this is Russia we're talking about. They might be able to get the humans there, but not necessarily get them back. Well there's two sentences that convey a huge amount of prejudice but zero knowledge. Remember this is Russia we are talking about, a nation which has not lost a cosmonaut in a spaceflight accident since 1971. The USA has lost 14 astronauts since 1986.
Comment icon #16 Posted by Silver Surfer on 6 August, 2014, 12:05
yes america landed on the moon. Then after landing they boosted off and made it back to earth.. in 1969. NO REALLY.
Comment icon #17 Posted by keithisco on 6 August, 2014, 18:56
From the link... An estimated cost of one project aimed at the development of an automatic lunar station is 10 billion rubles (about $280 million). The project is to be completed in five or six years. The manned lunar mission will cost ten times more,” Mitrofanov told reporters during the COSPAR Scientific Assembly in Moscow. That is precisely what I was posting in relation to...
Comment icon #18 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf on 14 August, 2014, 14:17
That is precisely what I was posting in relation to... How exactly? When I was at school 10 x 280 million was 2.8 billion, which is the figure you are disputing. Mitrofanov's figure is on agreement with the original estimate NOT with you.


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


  On the forums
Forum posts:
Forum topics:
Members:

5858507
264650
165152

 
New clue emerges in DB Cooper hijacking case
1-22-2017
An independent investigation in to the long-running mystery has managed to dig up an important new clue.
Did humans wipe out Australia's megafauna ?
1-22-2017
A new study has cast doubt on the idea that climate change wiped out most of Australia's huge beasts.
Some of us are able to 'hear' flashes of light
1-21-2017
Scientists have identified a form of synaesthesia that may affect more than one fifth of the population.
Fresh doubts cast on Tunguska impact theory
1-21-2017
Russian scientists have found evidence to suggest that the impact crater may predate the event itself.
Featured book
 
By Toryn Chapman
Campbell Mackenzie is a successful lawyer with occasional feelings of déjà vu. There's just one problem, though - it's not déjà vu.
Featured Videos
Gallery icon 
Coconut octopus vs crab
Posted 1-22-2017 | 0 comments
A coconut octopus lies in wait for an unsuspecting meal in this Smithsonian Channel clip.
 
What would happen if you fell 365 meters ?
Posted 1-21-2017 | 2 comments
A look at what would happen if you were unfortunate enough to fall from a great height.
 
A colorful 'landing' on Pluto
Posted 1-20-2017 | 0 comments
This NASA movie explores would it might be like to land on the dwarf planet Pluto.
 
The future of warfare
Posted 1-19-2017 | 2 comments
Drone armies and laser cannons may become increasingly common in the near future.
 
Kowloon Walled City
Posted 1-18-2017 | 1 comment
A look at what was once the most densely populated area on the surface of the planet.
 
 View: More videos
Stories & Experiences
Phantom vehicle
1-6-2017 | Ramer, United States
 
True ghost stories
1-6-2017 | Southern California
 
Floating tiles
1-6-2017 | Chewelah, Washington
 
A haunting in Northern California
12-28-2016 | Northern California
 
Strange creature in South Africa
12-28-2016 | South Africa, Hoedspruit.
 
A 15-year-old predicted my future!
12-21-2016 | Katherine, Australia
 
The haunted pond
12-21-2016 | Essex, Ontario, Canada
 
The haunted hospital
12-28-2016 | New Plymouth, New Zealand
 
Loud crash in the night
12-17-2016 | Pennsylvania
 
Mysterious woman in a blue dress
12-17-2016 | Northern Ireland
 

         More stories | Send us your story
 
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.7 Unexplained-Mysteries.com © 2001-2017
Privacy Policy and Disclaimer   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ