Friday, May 3, 2024
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries
You are viewing: Home > News > Archaeology & History > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All ▾
Search Submit

Archaeology & History

Stonehenge may have been a raised platform

By T.K. Randall
March 16, 2015 · Comment icon 47 comments

Did a large wooden altar sit on top of the stones ? Image Credit: CC BY-SA 2.5 Jeffrey Pfau
A new theory has proposed that the prehistoric stone circle may have supported a large wooden altar.
One of the world's best known Neolithic monuments, Stonehenge has been the focus of numerous archaeological studies over the years. These days experts generally agree that the site was once an important communal and spiritual focal point and that it was built some time between 3000 and 2000 BC.

Now however new research has suggested that the huge stone blocks may have once been used to support a large wooden platform on which important spiritual ceremonies were carried out.
"In early times, no spiritual ceremonies would have been performed on the ground," said writer and former museum curator Julian Spalding. "The feet of holy people were not allowed to touch the ground. We've been looking at Stonehenge from a modern, Earth-bound perspective."

Whether there really was a large wooden platform sitting on top of the stones however remains a matter of debate as no conclusive evidence has been found to support this hypothesis.

"There could be something in it," said archaeologist Aubrey Burl. "Anything new and worthwhile about Stonehenge is well worth looking into, but with care and consideration."

Source: Russia Today | Comments (47)




Other news and articles
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #38 Posted by Starhunter 9 years ago
There's a big difference between discussing and trying to siphon information which does not directly relate to the topic, and getting emotive because you can't get free online education. Just a refresher - the topic is the possibility of the henge being built for a raised platform. I disagreed and gave a couple of my reasons. What else I might have in mind is up to me to say if I feel it needs to be added. Sorry.
Comment icon #39 Posted by Likely Guy 9 years ago
There's a big difference between discussing and trying to siphon information which does not directly relate to the topic, and getting emotive because you can't get free online education. Just a refresher - the topic is the possibility of the henge being built for a raised platform. I disagreed and gave a couple of my reasons. What else I might have in mind is up to me to say if I feel it needs to be added. Sorry. So if I was to say that in my opinion it was intended to be an alien landing pad, that should be okay? I shouldn't expect anyone else to question my opinion? This is, after all, a dis... [More]
Comment icon #40 Posted by Starhunter 9 years ago
So if I was to say that in my opinion it was intended to be an alien landing pad, that should be okay? I shouldn't expect anyone else to question my opinion? This is, after all, a discussion forum. And yeah, I'm pretty much with everyone else... if you don't care to discuss your opinion, why bring it up? What one person understands another doesn't and possibly could not, so it is not possible to please everybody. It would be like me questioning what you mean by the word "the" and then asking what "t" means, and asking you provide evidence that "t" means "t" and not anything else, and so forth.... [More]
Comment icon #41 Posted by Likely Guy 9 years ago
What one person understands another doesn't and possibly could not, so it is not possible to please everybody. It would be like me questioning what you mean by the word "the" and then asking what "t" means, and asking you provide evidence that "t" means "t" and not anything else, and so forth. You know if people want everyday answers, they don't need to listen to anybody else, they can just pick up a magazine in the waiting room. To me. that made no sense. Let's everyone assume that I'm stupid so that you can better explain that, to me.
Comment icon #42 Posted by Starhunter 9 years ago
To me. that made no sense. Let's everyone assume that I'm stupid so that you can better explain that, to me. It does not matter if you are stupid or not, you are entitled to an opinion and a comment, and to supply whatever reasoning you want. You are not obliged to spill your life and mind to anyone. It is up to the reader to work out by their own knowledge what they accept and what they don't from what you have supplied. And if you choose not to go any further, because you think you have said enough on the topic, that is your right. Obviously you would not say something that you know is false... [More]
Comment icon #43 Posted by Likely Guy 9 years ago
...I give people the benefit of the doubt, even if I think they are wrong, because whatever they think has been shaped by real experiences and thoughts in life, which in itself are a reflection of reality, which is true. That sounds very sanctimonious albeit falsely, as in another thread you just referred to me as "unlikelyguy" for expressing my beliefs. I in no way attacked you or what you stated in that thread, yet you found words to try and demean me. You talk the talk, but you don't walk it.
Comment icon #44 Posted by Starhunter 9 years ago
That sounds very sanctimonious albeit falsely, as in another thread you just referred to me as "unlikelyguy" for expressing my beliefs. I in no way attacked you or what you stated in that thread, yet you found words to try and demean me. You talk the talk, but you don't walk it. Don't be too simple on this, you started with another in condoning 'personal belief attacks' not related to the subject. It's a cheap laugh. Yes, you are an unlikely guy if you start making remarks designed to undermine and distract what someone is saying. Try not to be so sensitive either, and realize that I am actual... [More]
Comment icon #45 Posted by Calibeliever 9 years ago
snip
Comment icon #46 Posted by Ahenge_0f_stone 9 years ago
Do they realize that the middle sarsen Stones are much taller making it hard to believe that it was just a platform. Why not just use wood or a platform?
Comment icon #47 Posted by robinrenee 9 years ago
A geologist named Christian O'Brien ( http://www.goldenage...biographies.php ) has hypothesized that Stonehenge was not only for astronomical observations, but also for shelter. That is was built during a time of solar instability that caused frequent cosmic ray bombardment. He suggested that Stonehenge had a roof of wood and sod to protect those who sought shelter there. He suggested that the long barrows and round barrows served the same purpose. http://www.avebury-w...wk_lbarrow.html While in other parts of the world, people were seeking shelter in caves, in the UK they built their "caves."... [More]


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Top 10 trending mysteries
Recent news and articles