Tuesday, August 22, 2017
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help   RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos
Find: in

House-sized asteroid 'will not hit Earth'

Posted on Saturday, 12 August, 2017 | Comment icon 15 comments

An impact with the Earth has been avoided this time. Image Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech
The asteroid known as 2012 TC4 is set to pass us by at a safe distance of 27,300 miles in October.
At around 20-30 meters long, the asteroid, which first skipped past us five years ago, is only slightly smaller than the object thought to have been responsible for the Tunguska explosion in 1908.

There had been some uncertainty over just how close it was going to get to our planet during its rendez-vous this year but now, astronomers at the Very Large Telescope of the European Southern Observatory (ESO) have been able to definitively confirm that it does not pose a threat.

"We know for sure that there is no possibility for this object to hit the Earth," said Detlef Koschny of ESA's near-Earth objects research team. "There is no danger whatsoever."

That said, with a trajectory that will take it 27,300 miles from the Earth's surface (approximately an eighth of the distance to the Moon), there is no denying that it will be a close call.

"[This] is an excellent opportunity to test the international ability to detect and track near-Earth objects and assess our ability to respond together to a real asteroid threat," ESA said in a statement.

Source: The Guardian | Comments (15)

Tags: Asteroid

Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #6 Posted by seanjo on 13 August, 2017, 7:55
The Chelyabinsk meteor broke up with an explosive force at about 30k's above ground, only small pieces reached earth. The injuries occurredas a result of the shockwave from the explosive breakup. There was no destructive impact...
Comment icon #7 Posted by Nzo on 13 August, 2017, 10:18
'supposed to' A lot of things can happen in space to nudge an object a few thousand miles. Plasma storms... other interplanetary objects... We really have to get a system in place to blast these things right out of the sky leaving just a few small fragments.
Comment icon #8 Posted by Noxasa on 13 August, 2017, 14:33
Guess it depends on what you define as "impact." It did impact the atmosphere and it was destructive as it damaged over 7,200 buildings and collapsed a factory roof along with injuring people. A shockwave, whether in the from an ground impact or in the atmosphere alone, is still an impact and it can cause damage either way. Asteroid 2012 TC4 is nothing to take lightly even at its size and can cause even more damage than the Chelyabinsk event as it's likely a bigger asteroid.
Comment icon #9 Posted by bison on 14 August, 2017, 0:36
The likeliest distance of closest approach was changedfrom about 55,000 miles to around 31,000, when they reacquired the object recently. That was a notable jump, all in just one day. Provided there are no further radical changes, this probably indicates observation or calculation errors, unanticipated effects on the object, such as it emittingcomet like jets, or encounters with other small objects.
Comment icon #10 Posted by Noteverythingisaconspiracy on 14 August, 2017, 0:59
As long as an asteroid misses the Earth there is really no reason to do anything. "Blasting" the thing might be counter productive as it might result in many more asteroids hitting the Earth, increasing the chance of hitting populated areas. The best thing to do about an asteroid like this is nothing.
Comment icon #11 Posted by Sundew on 14 August, 2017, 3:00
Guess I was thinking of the circumference.
Comment icon #12 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf on 15 August, 2017, 9:34
And your point is? What yousaid was factually incorrect. The Chelyabinsk meteor was not so tiny that it burned up on the atmosphere. Only small pieces reached the ground because it exploded NOT because it burned up. The same thing happened at Tunguska, do you consider that tiny too? This asteroid is the same size as Chelyabinsk. Chelyabinsk demonstrated categorically that objects this size present a threat to life and property. No amount of goal post moving will change that fact that your claim was wrong.
Comment icon #13 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf on 15 August, 2017, 9:37
Nope it represents nothing of the sort. It represents the fact that more observations lead to a refinement of the orbital parameters. The orbit can be determined more precisely.
Comment icon #14 Posted by freetoroam on 15 August, 2017, 10:00
I do not think it is as easy as that, contrary to what you may have watched on Star Wars, sending a rocket into space to blast anything right out of the sky is timely, costly, needs preparation and is extremely dangerous.
Comment icon #15 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf on 15 August, 2017, 10:14
To back that up: No errors needed, no jets needed, None of bison's theories needed. More observations WERE needed.

Please Login or Register to post a comment.

  On the forums
Forum posts:
Forum topics:


 Spirituality, Religion and Beliefs
  The Reality of God
 Ghosts, Hauntings & The Paranormal
  Ghost at Gettysburg?
  Make America Ghostly Again: Demon Cat of D.C.
  A laser pointer-like red light
 Extraterrestrial Life & The UFO Phenomenon
  Kenneth Arnold UFOs
  NOMOLI Ancient Alien Stones
  Dialogue with the alien
Mystery microbe may be key to origin of viruses
The microorganism was discovered in the lakes of the Rauer Islands off the coast of Antarctica.
There won't always be total solar eclipses
One day, the Moon will have moved so far away that a total solar eclipse will no longer be possible.
Man has a live gecko removed from his ear
A man in China got the surprise of his life after visiting the doctor with severe pain in his ear.
Three-mile-wide asteroid to pass by the Earth
The huge space rock is due to pass within a safe distance of our planet at the beginning of September.
Featured Videos
Gallery icon 
How to watch the eclipse
Posted 8-21-2017 | 8 comments
Staring at the Sun is dangerous. Here's how to watch the eclipse without damaging your eyes.
The napkin ring problem
Posted 8-20-2017 | 0 comments
Why is it that any two 'napkin rings' cut from any sizes of spherical object will have equal volume ?
Why don't we use our parent's names?
Posted 8-19-2017 | 2 comments
Why do we call our parents mom and dad instead of using their actual names ?
Adam Savage meets an alien
Posted 8-18-2017 | 2 comments
The former MythBuster checks out the animatronic alien from the movie Alien Covenant.
Concrete blocks chest smash
Posted 8-17-2017 | 0 comments
Multiple world record holder Ali Bahcetepe has 16 concrete blocks smashed on his chest.
 View: More videos
Stories & Experiences
A night that I will never forget
8-18-2017 | Massena, NY
8-18-2017 | Cranbrook British Columbia
Ghost experiences ?
8-11-2017 | United States
My real, true experiences
7-26-2017 | New Zealand
Incoming call
7-26-2017 | B.T. Collins Park: Folsom, CA
Three knocks woke me up twice
7-26-2017 | Virginia
Spider signs
7-21-2017 | Michigan

         More stories | Send us your story
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.7 Unexplained-Mysteries.com 2001-2017
Privacy Policy and Disclaimer   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ