Friday, May 3, 2024
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries
You are viewing: Home > News > Space & Astronomy > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All ▾
Search Submit

Space & Astronomy

Massive, distant black hole 'shouldn't exist'

By T.K. Randall
December 7, 2017 · Comment icon 7 comments

How such a large black hole formed so early remains a total mystery. Image Credit: NASA / Alain Riazuelo
A newly discovered supermassive black hole is challenging what scientists know of the early universe.
The cosmic behemoth, which appears as it did a mere 690 million years after the Big Bang, is around 800 million times the mass of our Sun - much larger than it should be for its relatively young age.

"This is the only object we have observed from this era," said Prof Robert Simcoe of MIT. "It has an extremely high mass, and yet the universe is so young that this thing shouldn't exist."

"The universe was just not old enough to make a black hole that big. It's very puzzling."
The find suggests that some other, completely unknown, process must have been at work.

"If you start with a seed like a big star, and let it grow at the maximum possible rate, and start at the moment of the Big Bang, you could never make something with 800 million solar masses - it's unrealistic," said Professor Simcoe.

"So there must be another way that it formed. And how exactly that happens, nobody knows."

Source: Independent | Comments (7)




Other news and articles
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #1 Posted by Unfortunately 6 years ago
This news is absolutely fascinating , great find Waspie! Yet another unexplainable mystery making us rethink things that we already thought were set in stone. 
Comment icon #2 Posted by Trelane 6 years ago
Such wonders to be discovered! The lady she flirts with us and shows us some secrets yet remains mysterious.
Comment icon #3 Posted by paperdyer 6 years ago
Could have this Black Hole absorbed other Galaxies to be this big s young?
Comment icon #4 Posted by Calibeliever 6 years ago
The other obvious possibility is they aren't calculating the age of the black hole correctly.
Comment icon #5 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf 6 years ago
That's unlikely unless the entire theory of big bang, expansion of the universe and red shift are wrong.
Comment icon #6 Posted by South Alabam 6 years ago
I wonder what the mass of it is now?
Comment icon #7 Posted by Calibeliever 6 years ago
It does seem unlikely given the refinement of the process of dating things over the last 60-70 years. But as a scientist, if your findings are wildly out sync with your expectations you have to start with your measurements first. Because either a. the dating is wrong, b. the mass is wrong or c. your theory of formation is wrong. I'd triple check a and b before I start re-writing c. 


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Top 10 trending mysteries
Recent news and articles