Thursday, May 2, 2024
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries
You are viewing: Home > News > Archaeology & History > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All ▾
Search Submit

Archaeology & History

Pyramid building secrets unlocked

By T.K. Randall
September 29, 2010 · Comment icon 138 comments

Image Credit: Hedwig Storch
A Norwegian University researcher believes he has unlocked the key to the pyramids' construction.
For years experts have tried to figure out how the pyramids of Egypt were constructed, in particular how such heavy blocks were moved and placed with such precision. Ole J. Bryn believes he has the answer - ancient Egypt's equivalent of the modern building grid.
Scientists from around the world have tried to understand how the Egyptians erected their giant pyramids. Now, an architect and researcher at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) says he has the answer to this ancient, unsolved puzzle.


Source: Science Daily | Comments (138)




Other news and articles
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #129 Posted by cladking 14 years ago
In many cases, I don't think it's a case of being just ill-informed. I think it's also due to fringe adherents' deliberate avoidance of studying legitimate research. Whether this is because they do not wish to expend the considerable effort it takes to be properly informed, or because they're afraid how quickly legitimate studies will nullify their beliefs, it's not an excuse. It's a slothful copout. I'm fully aware that all egyptologists aren't sun addled lunatics. I have no doubt that most are intelligent, creative, and curious. I'mnot talking about individuals when I slam them, just a field... [More]
Comment icon #130 Posted by questionmark 14 years ago
I believe they used geysers because I believe this is the best fit explanation for the evidence, all the evidence. Obviously geysers are not a best fit idea for a phenomenon that existed at Giza but this is something that needs to be reconciled with the evidence and with theory. I know how how to reconcile it with evidence so this is where I personally would begin. Well, you either have no idea of the geological requirements for a cold water geyser or you are purposely ignoring it. There is hardly any difference between the geological requirements of a cold water and a hot water geyser. Both h... [More]
Comment icon #131 Posted by cladking 14 years ago
Well, you either have no idea of the geological requirements for a cold water geyser or you are purposely ignoring it. There is hardly any difference between the geological requirements of a cold water and a hot water geyser. Both happen only in volcanic areas. Hot water in volcanic active and cold water in volcanic extinct areas. Volcanic areas are not composed of limestone but mostly granitic. Giza fits neither, the nearest volcanic activity that ever happened around there was in the Black Dessert, about 400 miles away. It took me about 10 minutes to find that out. You know so much more than... [More]
Comment icon #132 Posted by questionmark 14 years ago
You know so much more than you're letting on. For instance you obviously know that carbonated water can travel underground for 400 miles. If I'd known that I'd have given up long ago. Two out of three geologists don't know there's such a thing as cold- water geysers but you know how close they have to be to a source of CO2. I don't even know how far the gas can travel under the ground so my ignorance just makes me keep looking. That would be a so called artesian well, which requires an impermeable sediment, better said, two of them. Does not exist in Giza either.
Comment icon #133 Posted by cladking 14 years ago
That would be a so called artesian well, which requires an impermeable sediment, better said, two of them. Does not exist in Giza either. Up until the 14th of last month Hawass didn't even admit there was a cave at Giza. I suppose this all is going to be baby steps.
Comment icon #134 Posted by questionmark 14 years ago
Up until the 14th of last month Hawass didn't even admit there was a cave at Giza. I suppose this all is going to be baby steps. Hawass discovered a cave himself about ten years ago, he wrote an article about the "Osiris Shaft" at the time. What he did not, and still does not, is to acknowledge that "cave complex" a certain quack postulates. And to the contrary of what the aforesaid claims, the plateau was scanned in the last month by ground penetrating radar and guess what? No such complex was found. Besides, it is quite irrelevant what Hawass says, the competent people in this case are the g... [More]
Comment icon #135 Posted by cladking 14 years ago
Hawass discovered a cave himself about ten years ago, he wrote an article about the "Osiris Shaft" at the time. What he did not, and still does not, is to acknowledge that "cave complex" a certain quack postulates. And to the contrary of what the aforesaid claims, the plateau was scanned in the last month by ground penetrating radar and guess what? No such complex was found. Besides, it is quite irrelevant what Hawass says, the competent people in this case are the geologists, and they fail to see the requirements for a geyser. Especially for a cold water geyser, as it would have destroyed all... [More]
Comment icon #136 Posted by questionmark 14 years ago
Yes, Hawass is working on one now and I applaud him. It would also be nice that since they can't find the water inlet nor outlet down here with today's technology that they at least do a comprehensive analysisof the water. Maybe if they wait till august there will even be high levels of CO2 in it! Can't, the best is trace amounts else it turns into carbonic acid, which is unstable under atmospheric pressure. It fizzles out, just like your soda pop.
Comment icon #137 Posted by cladking 14 years ago
Can't, the best is trace amounts else it turns into carbonic acid, which is unstable under atmospheric pressure. It fizzles out, just like your soda pop. Yes. You're quite right. I meant "high levels" as in far higher than would be expected. This does mean little more than trace amounts. There are anecdotal reports that under some conditions this water does in- deed "fizzle". I was thinking of this when I used the term "high levels".
Comment icon #138 Posted by JGirl 14 years ago
JGirl I understand your feelings exactly. The fringe has been stuck in the same boring rut for decades. There are lots more interesting cultures, sites, artifacts and places to discuss but the same ones just keep getting beaten to death.....boring you got it - and i will, however reluctantly, include stonehenge in there too. although, man oh man, if only they could actually uncover something tangible about that site...


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Top 10 trending mysteries
Recent news and articles