The Apollo 8 'Earthrise' photograph. Image Credit: NASA
More than 45 years on, the iconic Apollo 8 photograph has been reconstructed in a new video.
On Christmas Eve in 1968, Frank Borman, James Lovell and William Anders, the first astronauts in history to orbit the moon, emerged from behind the lunar sphere to witness a spectacle that would define man's place among the stars - the sight of our own planet Earth peeking out above the horizon.
"In lunar orbit, it occurred to me that, here we are, all the way up there at the moon, and we're studying this thing, and it's really the Earth as seen from the moon that's the most interesting aspect of this flight," said Anders, who took the now famous photograph of the spectacle.
Now 45 years on, NASA has been able to reconstruct the sight of the Earthrise precisely as the astronauts would have seen it using data collected by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter.
"This new simulation allows anyone to virtually ride with the astronauts and experience the awe they felt at the vista in front of them," the space agency said in a statement.
The same was showing earth rise. Photographically is impossible to make disappearing items located outside the focusing area. They wouldn't be clear yes...but to vanish entirely hum.... Look at the pic below from hubble See the stars? http://starchild.gsfc.nasa.gov/Images/StarChild/space_level2/servicing_hst_big.gif
The same was showing earth rise. Photographically is impossible to make disappearing items located outside the focusing area. They wouldn't be clear yes...but to vanish entirely hum.... Look at the pic below from hubble See the stars? http://starchild.gsfc.nasa.gov/Images/StarChild/space_level2/servicing_hst_big.gif DO you know the difference between a camera intended to take pictures of far off planets and suns from the cameras used on the Apollo missions? We're talking more than a few pixels here.
I'll repeat what I said last time: Which, as anyone who isn't totally and utterly clueless about photography would know, is exactly the number of stars there should be in the images. If you want to talk about conspiracies theories may I suggest the conspiracy theories section. There is a long running topic on the moon hoax theory there. You will find plenty of people there that aren't totally and utterly clueless about photography and would be more than happy explain to you why there are no stars. Now as you clearly know nothing about photography, exposure times and how that affects what is an... [More]
Your defensive overreaction to a simple question is quite telling... Why didn't NASA ever adjust exposure and take a photo of the stars from the moon on any of its missions? Watch the press conference of the Apollo 11 astronauts after they supposedly returned from the moon. Do they act like they just achieved the greatest feat in the history of mankind?
Your defensive overreaction to a simple question is quite telling... Why didn't NASA ever adjust exposure and take a photo of the stars from the moon on any of its missions? Watch the press conference of the Apollo 11 astronauts after they supposedly returned from the moon. Do they act like they just achieved the greatest feat in the history of mankind? Why would they? They were not there to study stars, so why would they try to take pictures of stars? Not having traveled to the moon, I can't guess what the proper reaction should be of someone who has been to the moon.
G'day Never_A_Straight_Answer, and welcome to the forum. Your defensive overreaction to a simple question is quite telling... Is it? What would you say if Waspie didn't reply? "See, he doesn't have an answer. We must be on to something."? Us poor Apollo supporters...we can't win. ;-) Why didn't NASA ever adjust exposure and take a photo of the stars from the moon on any of its missions? A few answers come to mind: 1. Why? NASA's astronauts went to the Moon to study, well, the Moon. That's why they collected rocks and stuff. What would they achieve by taking an ordinary light photo of stars? 2.... [More]
Sounds like we have a "We didn't land on the moon" tin hatter amongst us. No stars were in the photo for the same reason no stars were in photos of the men who walked on the moon. The reflection of the sun off the moon's surface was too bright, washed out the stars. Same reason you don't get stars in a daytime photo pointed up to the clouds. The stars are still there.
Sorry, one more offtopic post.. Hopefully to be continued here. Your defensive overreaction to a simple question is quite telling... Why didn't NASA ever adjust exposure and take a photo of the stars from the moon on any of its missions? Watch the press conference of the Apollo 11 astronauts after they supposedly returned from the moon. Do they act like they just achieved the greatest feat in the history of mankind? I (like all informed folks) know this one!!! Apart from anything else, it's because .. only an completely uninformed (or deliberately trolling) person would think that taking a pic... [More]
Please Login or Register to post a comment.