Tuesday, January 16, 2018
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help   RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos
Find: in

Hunt for exoplanet ETs poses new challenge


Posted on Friday, 2 May, 2014 | Comment icon 27 comments

Finding life on an alien world is going to be a challenge. Image Credit: NASA/Ames/JPL-Caltech
Finding signs of extraterrestrial life on an extrasolar planet is going to be a lot harder than expected.
As astronomers continue to identify new extrasolar planets in orbit around distant stars, the question on everybody's lips is whether or not any of these distant worlds could be home to extraterrestrial life.

Despite recently finding a rocky Earth-sized world in the habitable zone of another solar system, astronomers are still unable to determine whether this planet or any other in the distant reaches of space could support life. Larger, more powerful telescopes in the future could potentially accomplish this, but there are still other obstacles to overcome.

The current method for identifying whether or not a planet is habitable involves looking for bio-signatures in its atmosphere such as methane and oxygen, chemicals that are usually associated with life. The problem however is that these chemicals can also exist on barren worlds with no life on them at all, leading to the possibility of false positives.

"There are plenty of reasons to be optimistic that we will find hints of extraterrestrial life within the next few decades, just maybe not on an Earth-like planet around a Sun-like star," said study lead author Hanno Rein.

Source: IB Times | Comments (27)

Tags: Alien, Extraterrestrial, Extrasolar Planet

Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #18 Posted by Lilly on 5 May, 2014, 14:48
.... In the case of extraterrestrial life we haven't enough of a sample to draw conclusions, but often the assertion of the existence of a phenomenon can be pretty much dismissed when people check thousands of samples and don't find it. If in the future if we send probes to large numbers of other planets and no sign of life is ever found, then the probability of life elsewhere would be considered as being quite remote. However, we have not done this as of yet. The only other planet we've managed to 'scope out' is Mars. A sample of "one" tells us nothing.
Comment icon #19 Posted by taniwha on 6 May, 2014, 11:20
The real question here is why is scientific progress so meaningless to you? Why do you not value a better understanding of the universe? Why do you think ignorance is better than knowledge? Why would you rather guess than know? Read the follow VERY slowly, I have said this to you over and over again, One day it might sink in:- In science assumptions count for NOTHING, evidence counts for EVERYTHING. Since assumptions count for nothing all assumptions are equally INVALID if they have no supporting evidence. Scientific progress will never be able to prove that we ARE alone in the universe I will... [More]
Comment icon #20 Posted by Frank Merton on 6 May, 2014, 12:33
I think the search for life on Mars is secondary and not really expected to find anything but worth it just in case. The real reason for all the study of Mars is to understand planets better, including our own. We may never find ET out there, which would probably be a loss to us in overcoming our species chauvinism and in learning who knows what. If we do it will be a shock, especially to religions based on the idea that man is the center of God's plan. It won't help other religions much either (I don't expect to see them in saffron robes any more than Praising Allah).
Comment icon #21 Posted by GreenmansGod on 9 May, 2014, 18:38
Scientific progress will never be able to prove that we ARE alone in the universe I will guarantee you that for free. Thats why the scientific drive is being funded to find it, unless they are spending all that money on mars trying to prove life doesnt exist? Does it seem logical to try and detect UNLIFE before sending humans? Yes. The moon was found to be lifeless before we landed. The trend will continue until life is found then a high authority will be enforced on Earth. A rule to rule all others. But thats the future so when you eliminate the impossible whatever is left is certainly possib... [More]
Comment icon #22 Posted by taniwha on 10 May, 2014, 0:56
You seem to have a issue with spending money on pure science. What do you think pure science is taking money away from? Bombs and tanks is the most logical thing that would come to my mind. Obviously it is not going to go for education. I want to know, I don't like guessing. Guessing usually gets me in trouble. My best guess is there is lots of life, but it is still only a guess. Sitting on this rock, fighting over little pieces paper isn't much of a life in the end. It is not something intelligent life does. Yes good point i wonder if the answer to if we are alone or not really matters. What ... [More]
Comment icon #23 Posted by E. L. Wisty on 12 May, 2014, 19:07
I don't really see why this is a problem. If there's oxygen in a planet's atmosphere and methane in its moon's atmosphere, then there will be a period at extremely regular intervals when the methane signature vanishes as the moon passes behind the planet. Obviously, no scientist worthy of his job deion would say that a result this important had been conclusively proven until it had been checked many, many times. The basic method of detecting exoplanets already involves spotting the very slight periodic dimming of a star as planets pass in front of it; all you need to do is apply the same techn... [More]
Comment icon #24 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf on 12 May, 2014, 23:06
I don't really see why this is a problem. If there's oxygen in a planet's atmosphere and methane in its moon's atmosphere, then there will be a period at extremely regular intervals when the methane signature vanishes as the moon passes behind the planet. There are two problems with your idea. The first is that you would have to observe one exoplanet almost permanently for long periods of time in order to detect the regular drop in the methane signature. With over 1700 exoplanets already discovered and new satellites and ground-based telescopes under construction that will increase that figure... [More]
Comment icon #25 Posted by bison on 13 May, 2014, 14:43
The idea of an Earth-sized planet in the habitable zone of its star, with a moon large enough to retain a substantial atmosphere seems unlikely. The problem of this sort of 'false positive' indication of life may be very rare.
Comment icon #26 Posted by JesseCuster on 15 May, 2014, 10:57
The idea of an Earth-sized planet in the habitable zone of its star, with a moon large enough to retain a substantial atmosphere seems unlikely. The problem of this sort of 'false positive' indication of life may be very rare. But if planets with life are even less common, then the method could throw up more false positives than findings of actual life, which would render it not much use as a means of detecting extraterrestrial life.
Comment icon #27 Posted by bison on 15 May, 2014, 21:18
We don't know how rare life bearing planets will be. I'm told that strong spectroscopic signatures of oxygen alone would be considered good evidence for life. Stable, non-biogenic oxygen on a planet would apparently be much less prominent than that created, and renewed by life. It should eventually be possible to distinguish between these two cases, in exoplanets.


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


  On the forums
Forum posts:
Forum topics:
Members:

6080002
260376
172472

 
Aztec epidemic mystery may have been solved
1-16-2018
500 years ago, a deadly epidemic known as 'cocoliztli' killed nearly 80 per cent of the Aztec population.
Could giant lasers shoot down space debris ?
1-15-2018
A new study by researchers in China has put forward a novel new way of tackling the problem of space junk.
'Ingredients for life' found in meteorites
1-15-2018
Scientists have found new evidence to suggest that life could have arisen elsewhere in the solar system.
Titanic to be turned in to a tourist attraction
1-14-2018
Entrepreneur Stockton Rush is aiming to offer tourists the opportunity to visit the wreckage in person.
Featured Videos
Gallery icon 
Typing vs handwriting
Posted 1-16-2018 | 2 comments
Is typing on a computer better or worse for your memory then writing on paper ?
 
Can coding help avoid job automation ?
Posted 1-12-2018 | 0 comments
Taking up coding and technical skills to avoid automation may be counter-productive.
 
Dinosaur death match
Posted 1-8-2018 | 0 comments
A look at how various dinosaurs might have fared against the predators of their day.
 
Best records of 2017
Posted 1-4-2018 | 0 comments
A look back at some of the most bizarre and amazing world records of the last year.
 
Did people really put frogs in milk ?
Posted 1-2-2018 | 0 comments
Is it true that people once put frogs in milk in order to stop it from spoiling ?
 
 View: More videos
Stories & Experiences
First college apartment
12-31-2017 | Daytona Beach, FL
 
The night my niece was murdered
12-19-2017 | Delhi, Louisiana
 
Mysterious Headlights
12-10-2017 | Morgan County, Alabama
 
Possibly a child ghost
12-10-2017 | Edgewater, Maryland
 
True story about black-eyed kids
12-10-2017 | Portland oregon
 
Alien or paranormal encounter ?
12-10-2017 | United States
 
Ouija board experience
12-10-2017 | Ohio
 
Strange occurrences
11-15-2017 | Fife
 
Mysterious music box song
11-15-2017 | U.S.A
 

         More stories | Send us your story
 
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.7 Unexplained-Mysteries.com 2001-2017
Privacy Policy and Disclaimer   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ