Is the original Mona Lisa buried beneath the image we see today ? Image Credit: Leonardo da Vinci
French scientist Pascal Cotte has suggested that Da Vinci's masterpiece may not be quite what it seems.
The Mona Lisa's enigmatic smile is an image that is familiar all around the world, yet below the aged brush strokes there may lie another picture entirely - one that has remained hidden for centuries.
Cotte has spent the better part of ten years studying every inch of the Mona Lisa using a variety of sophisticated techniques. One of these, which involves reflecting light waves off the canvas, has revealed that there may have been as many as four different images painted underneath.
One of these, which appears to be a different woman to the one in the painting, may actually be the real Mona Lisa - a woman by the name of Lisa Gherardini - thus opening up the possibility that the woman with the world-famous smile might not actually be her at all but someone else entirely.
Cotte maintains that there is no concrete way to determine how much time had passed between the addition of each layer meaning that the image of the figure underneath may have been put to canvas months or even years before the painting was completed.
Not everyone however agrees with his interpretations.
"A different outward appearance does not lead 100 percent into a hypothesis that these are two different persons," said researcher Claus-Christian Carbon. "I'm quite skeptical, because the minimal hypothesis is always the best I think, and that is just that [the portrait] was changed a bit."
Again, if I may go back to my experience with my mother. She was relatively poor, and art supplies are not cheap depending on the medium and substrate. As a young child (5-9 ?) I do recall her occasionally "re-purposing" the canvass of an oil painting she previously painted but did not like. Not sure what she did... I was so young. But I seem to recall her laying the painting flat, putting on some type of solution to break-up the dried oils, letting it sit for awhile, than literally scrapping then wiping it off. In most cases I could see a faint image of the previous painting. She would deal w... [More]
I`m with this: Will Gompertz, Arts Editor I'm sceptical. It's perfectly common for an artist to overpaint an image as it is for a client who's commissioned that artist to ask for changes. So it's not surprising that there are those underpaintings on the Mona Lisa. I agree it is very common for an artist to reuse a canvas. It also wouldn't be unsual for the artist to change the structure/angle of the subject and start over.
Interesting article, but back then wasn't the prohibitive cost of materials, particularly the canvas such that they re-used previous / failed paintings with new commissions to save money? If so it would be a rather anti-climactic end to this story lol.
I have a tv show that I DVR and there are 2 Mona Lisa paintings There are actually 3 versions that have been found so far. The Original in the Louvre, the Isleworth Mona Lisa, and the one in the El Prado Museum in Spain, which is the latest 'copy' found so far and it was found in 2012. http://www.thestar.com/news/world/2012/02/02/mona_lisas_twin_sister_discovered_in_spains_prado_art_museum.html There may be more ... .. . Ribbit
It appears he didn't like the first result (the nose was skinnier and more chiseled on the first one) and went back to fix it (and revised the eyes as well). Likely this type of revision was not unheard of in portrait painting as there really isn't a need for a new one if touch-ups can be done.
No, this (the original in the article) is a silly theory. What he seems to be picking up on is the underpainting. Which is the foundation of oil painting of the period. It's applied in layers, which don't tend to correspond to the final image, because the density of paint is key to modelling the subject. The image he claims is the original is terribly out of proportion, and implausible for someone with Leonardo's skill*. Compositionally, it's an absolutely glaring disaster and jars on the eye. As well as being anatomically unlikely. The reason why he's coming up with something that shape i... [More]
Please Login or Register to post a comment.