Tuesday, November 19, 2019
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help    |   Cookie Policy    |   Privacy Policy    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos
Find: in

The FBI tested Bigfoot hair back in the 1970s

Posted on Thursday, 6 June, 2019 | Comment icon 77 comments

Even the FBI has been involved in investigating Bigfoot. Image Credit: Roger Patterson / Bob Gimlin
Declassified documents have revealed that the FBI once tested hair and tissue samples of an alleged Bigfoot.
93-year-old Peter Byrne, who has spent decades hoping to prove the existence of the creature, repeatedly wrote to the FBI back in 1976 to have tests conducted on samples he'd collected.

"We do not often come across hair which we are unable to identify and the hair that we have now, about 15 hairs attached to a tiny piece of skin, is the first that we have obtained in six years which we feel may be of importance," he wrote to FBI Assistant Director Jay Cochran Jr.

Byrne also wrote to ask about tests conducted on other samples that the FBI had obtained.

"Will you kindly set the record straight, once and for all, inform us if the FBI has examined hair which might be that of a Bigfoot, when this took place, and if it did take place what the results of the analysis were," he wrote. "Please understand that our research here is serious."
The FBI replied a few weeks later to state that while the bureau normally only conducts such analyses as part of criminal investigations, "occasionally, on a case-by-case basis, in the interest of research and scientific inquiry, we make exceptions to the general policy."

"We will examine the hairs and tissue mentioned in your letter."

A follow-up letter later detailed the results which "included a study of morphological characteristics such as root structure, medullary structure and cuticle thickness in addition to scale casts."

"Also, the hairs were compared directly with hairs of known origin under a comparison microscope."

"It was concluded as a result of these examinations that the hairs are of a deer family origin."

Source: CNBC | Comments (77)

Tags: Bigfoot, FBI

Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #68 Posted by the13bats on 18 June, 2019, 11:49
sure, its not so much "falling for it" as a deep belief, sometimes too we are dealing with people who do not have such a defined line between real and imaginary, or mystical if you will. without spoiling the ending piney is one of the few here who has put time in hunting bf and based his opinions on that, so its pretty cool.    
Comment icon #69 Posted by Piney on 18 June, 2019, 12:45
There's a few other's who were here. They either moved on or died. 
Comment icon #70 Posted by Piney on 18 June, 2019, 12:54
It's all in the technique of using shadows and being a good mimic but being born with pointed ears, fangs and eyes that turn yellow helps a lot.  The power of suggestion is a great tool too. False memories are fun. Reputation creates it's own ideas and memory of events.   
Comment icon #71 Posted by UIOAE432 on 22 June, 2019, 14:45
How much This bloke who taped it walks exactly the same as this footage even they way he turned its him in a suit..Straight out,,LOAD OF CRAP PARANORMAL..They are telepathic ya wont see them theyhave seven sense ,This bloke was in the suit the 1 that filmed it .CANT STAND PEEPS WHO MAKE CRAP UP..WATCH HIM YOU WILL SEE,WATCH FROM THE START YOU WILL SEE TRUTH  
Comment icon #72 Posted by Old_Mil on 25 June, 2019, 16:40
I wouldn't call myself a Bigfoot "believer" per say, that would indicate a level of certainty I don't have.  However, I do suspect that an extant descendant of Gigantopithecus does exist today, accounting for the various sightings of Bigfoot/Yeti/Skunk Ape/etc.  Considering that the mountain gorilla was not discovered until 1902, I don't think that this theory is wildly speculative.  Certainly we don't have the sort of evidence for Bigfoot like we do for the Chupacabra (multiple videos, stills, corpses, and DNA test with skin biopsies ruling out mange).  In fact, in the latter case, it's almos... [More]
Comment icon #73 Posted by stereologist on 25 June, 2019, 20:19
I suspect in the case of the chupacabra you are talking about a type 2 chupacabra. I was not aware of any cases of type 2 bodies where mange had been ruled out. I woould be interested in learning about those cases.
Comment icon #74 Posted by the13bats on 26 June, 2019, 4:53
chupra type 1 was never anything but myth, hoax and imaginations, chupra type 2 is a blanket term something of an amalgamate for a hairless canid type creature who may be suffereing from mange ( no, never ruled out, cant be ) it may be a hybrid or mutant, most people who get a body just crave attention and $$$ not furthering science the one popped up stuffed on ebay for like 10k but tests just seem to be vauge i believe on purpose, one expert will say one thing another something else, with the type 2 trend it got so convoluted and down right cheesy i moved on.  
Comment icon #75 Posted by stereologist on 26 June, 2019, 12:56
Some people also have a type 3 chupacabra category which is all animals that the person cannot identify. On a recent trip I saw a pine marten which for many people would have been assigned chupacabra. I also saw a small rodent, possibly a lemming. It could have been incorrectly assigned to mouse or dwarf chupacabra, LOL. Chupacabra is pretty much the same as "I don't know."
Comment icon #76 Posted by the13bats on 27 June, 2019, 3:07
this is sadly true, its that chessy asinine mindset of "i dont know so it must be xxxx" i think thats my biggest hang up with dear true believers, no matter how hard i try when they play the "i dont know, so it must be xxxx" card it kills any and all interigrity and credibilty they might have had with me, simple no way to reach a definitive answer from "i dont know".
Comment icon #77 Posted by Alchopwn on 4 July, 2019, 9:21
Yeah, the simple IDK is the more honest answer.

Please Login or Register to post a comment.

  On the forums
9-year-old genius is set to graduate university
Laurent Simons is about to become one of the youngest people in history to earn themselves a university degree.
143 new Nazca geoglyphs discovered in Peru
Researchers have used an artificial intelligence to identity previously unseen drawings on the desert floor.
Ancient skeletons found wearing 'skull helmets'
The skeletons of two infants unearthed in Ecuador were found to be wearing helmets made from other skulls.
Is Greta Thunberg in a 120-year-old photo ?
A girl who happens to look uncannily like the young activist has been spotted in an old archive photograph.
Stories & Experiences
The houndsman
10-26-2019 | Michigan, USA
Birthday balloon
10-26-2019 | Usa
Devil man in a suit
10-26-2019 | Ohio
I accidentally called myself ?
9-28-2019 | United States
Giant wolf in my basement
9-28-2019 | Connecticut
I saw a shadow figure...
9-26-2019 | Australia
A haunting in Iowa
9-26-2019 | Central City, Iowa
Oddest thing I've ever seen
9-19-2019 | Kentucky
The blanket tugger
9-19-2019 | QLD
Unknown flash
9-19-2019 | GA

         More stories | Send us your story
Featured Videos
Gallery icon 
Coke and butane
Posted 11-17-2019 | 0 comments
The Slo Mo Guys return with another dangerous slow-motion stunt.
Origins of the Kraken
Posted 11-15-2019 | 0 comments
A look at the origin of the legendary multi-tentacled sea monster.
How lasers work with Neil deGrasse Tyson
Posted 11-11-2019 | 0 comments
The popular astrophysicist is joined by comedian Chuck Nice.
What is the scariest thing ?
Posted 11-8-2019 | 5 comments
We all have fears, but what can be considered the single scariest thing ?
48 hour blizzard time-lapse
Posted 11-7-2019 | 2 comments
This footage shows 31 inches of snow accumulating over the space of 48 hours.
 View: More videos
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.712 Unexplained-Mysteries.com (c) 2001-2019
Terms   |   Privacy Policy   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ