Tuesday, May 24, 2022
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
You are viewing: Home > News > Natural World > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  

Did you know that you can now support us on Patreon ?

You can subscribe for less than the cost of a cup of coffee - and we'll even throw in a range of exclusive perks as a way to say thank you.
Natural World

Is the coelacanth really a 'living fossil' ?

February 12, 2021 | Comment icon 6 comments

Coelacanths have been around for a long, long time. Image Credit: Citron / CC-BY-SA-3.0
New evidence has cast doubt on the idea that the coelacanth hasn't changed at all in millions of years.
Large, elusive and found deep in the oceans where they had until relatively recently remained hidden away from human civilization, the coelacanth was first discovered in 1938 at a time when fossil evidence seemed to suggest that it had been extinct for 66 million years.

Its remarkable similarity to fossil specimens from that era led scientists to declare it a 'living fossil' - a moniker given to creatures that have remained practically unchanged since prehistoric times.
Now however, a new study published in Molecular Biology and Evolution has called into doubt the whole idea of the 'living fossil' by revealing that, contrary to popular belief, at least one species of coelacanth has acquired dozens of genes over the last few million years.

The suggestion that the coelacanth is unchanged from its prehistoric forebears, therefore, is incorrect.

"Previous research has found that while coelacanth genes have evolved slowly compared to other fish, reptiles, and mammals, its genome as a whole has not evolved abnormally slowly and is hardly inert," said study author Isaac Yellan.

"I think that as more and more genomes are being published, the 'living fossil' concept is becoming increasingly something of a misconception, and I think many scientists would probably hesitate to assign it to any species."

Source: IFL Science | Comments (6)

Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #1 Posted by Tom1200 1 year ago
I always knew there was something fishy about that "living fossil" claim.
Comment icon #2 Posted by Stiff 1 year ago
Me too, but I couldn't quite plaice it.
Comment icon #3 Posted by Twin 1 year ago
I didn't know that there is ancient DNA to compare to the current.
Comment icon #4 Posted by psyche101 1 year ago
Hasn't this been known for a long time?† I remember posting differences in the fins skeletal structure here years ago.†
Comment icon #5 Posted by smanthaonvaca 1 year ago
Coelacanths are such awesome creatures... Sort of reminds me of this video. I think I saw something on the tv about a neighborhood that had gotten flooded with catfish walking their streets. A bit unrelated, but... † †
Comment icon #6 Posted by ted hughes 1 year ago
10 fun facts about the coelacanth:†The Creature Feature: 10 Fun Facts About the Coelacanth | WIRED

Please Login or Register to post a comment.

 Total Posts: 7,266,715    Topics: 298,892    Members: 196,994

 Not a member yet ? Click here to join - registration is free and only takes a moment!
Recent news and articles