We are now on Patreon! Click here to learn more about how you can help support the site.

Monday, December 6, 2021
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
You are viewing: Home > News > Science & Technology > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
Science & Technology

Could AI be the future of crime solving ?

August 25, 2021 | Comment icon 4 comments



Can computers solve crimes ? Image Credit: CC BY-SA 4.0 Tony Webster
Artificial intelligence can now help experts analyze footprints - and it has the potential to go much further.
Matthew Robert Bennett - a professor of environmental and geographical sciences, along with Marcin Budka - a professor of data science, both of Bournemouth University, take a look at the latest advances in AI forensics and what they might mean for the future of crime solving.



We rely on experts all the time. If you need financial advice, you ask an expert. If you are sick, you visit a doctor, and as a juror you may listen to an expert witness. In the future, however, artificial intelligence (AI) might replace many of these people.

In forensic science, the expert witness plays a vital role. Lawyers seek them out for their analysis and opinion on specialist evidence. But experts are human, with all their failings, and the role of expert witnesses has frequently been linked to miscarriages of justice.

We've been investigating the potential for AI to study evidence in forensic science. In two recent papers, we found AI was better at assessing footprints than general forensic scientists, but not better than specific footprint experts.

What's in a footprint?

As you walk around your home barefoot you leave footprints, as indentations in your carpet or as residue from your feet. Bloody footprints are common at violent crime scenes. They allow investigators to reconstruct events and perhaps profile an unknown suspect.

Shoe prints are one of the most common types of evidence, especially at domestic burglaries. These traces are recovered from windowsills, doors, toilet seats and floors and may be visible to or hidden from the naked eye. In the UK, recovered marks are analysed by police forces and used to search a database of footwear patterns.

The size of barefoot prints can tell you about a suspect's height, weight, and even gender. In a recent study, we asked an expert podiatrist to determine the gender of a bunch of footprints and they got it right just over 50% of the time. We then created a neural network, a form of AI, and asked it to do the same thing. It got it right around 90% of the time. What's more, much to our surprise, it could also assign an age to the track-maker at least to the nearest decade.

When it comes to shoe prints, footwear experts can identify the make and model of a shoe simply by experience - it's second nature to these experts and mistakes are rare. Anecdotally, we've been told there are fewer than 30 footwear experts in the UK today. However, there are thousands of forensic and police personnel in the UK who are casual users of the the footwear database. For these casual users, analysing footwear can be challenging and their work often needs to be verified by an expert. For that reason, we thought AI may be able to help.
We tasked a second neural network, developed as part of an ongoing partnership with UK-based Bluestar Software, with identifying the make and model of footwear impressions. This AI takes a black and white footwear impression and automatically recognises the shape of component treads. Are the component treads square, triangular or circular? Is there a logo or writing on the shoe impression? Each of these shapes corresponds to a code in a simple classification. It is these codes that are used to search the database. In fact the AI gives a series of suggested codes for the user to verify and identifies areas of ambiguity that need checking.

In one of our experiments, an occasional user was given 100 randomly selected shoe prints to analyse. Across the trial, which we ran several times, the casual user got it right between 22% and 83% of the time. In comparison the AI was between 60% and 91% successful. Footwear experts, however, are right nearly 100% of the time.

One reason why our second neural network was not perfect and didn't outperform real experts is that shoes vary with wear, making the task more complex. Buy a new pair of shoes and the tread is sharp and clear but after a month or two it becomes less clear. But while the AI couldn't replace the expert trained to spot these things it did outperform occasional users, suggesting it could help free up time for the expert to focus on more difficult cases.

Will AI replace experts?

Systems like this increase the accuracy of footwear evidence and we will probably see it used more often than it is currently - especially in intelligence-led policing that aims to link crimes and reduce the cost of domestic burglaries. In the UK alone they cost on average £5,930 per incident in 2018, which amounts to a total economic cost of £4.1 billion.

AI will never replace the skilled and experienced judgement of a well-trained footwear examiner. But it might help by reducing the burden on those experts and allow them to focus on the difficult cases by helping the casual users to identify the make and model of a footprint more reliably on their own. At the same time, the experts who use this AI will replace the ones who don't.

Matthew Robert Bennett, Professor of Environmental and Geographical Sciences, Bournemouth University and Marcin Budka, Professor of Data Science, Bournemouth University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license.

Read the original article. The Conversation

Source: The Conversation | Comments (4)



Unexplained Mysteries is now on Patreon!

Click here to learn more about how you can help support the site and gain access to a range of perks including a subscriber badge, ad-free browsing, an exclusive weekly newsletter, sneak peaks of upcoming features and more.
23 / 25  
We are 92% of the way to our second Patreon subscriber target - thank you!
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #1 Posted by Desertrat56 3 months ago
I don't think this is going to be a good idea.  Once we start depending on AI, our species is doomed.
Comment icon #2 Posted by MissJatti 3 months ago
Reminds Me of Detroit: Becoming Human
Comment icon #3 Posted by Freez1 3 months ago
It?s going to go much further than you might think. Artificial intelligence can be used to monitor everything you search, read and post online. It will follow all of you?re social networks and even you?re phone. And with good accuracy it will be able to spot crazy people either after they committed a crime or before it even happens. Imagine not just catching a drug dealer but being able to prevent someone from wanting to be one. A synthetic mind capable of tracking a total nut case before they decide to harm a single person? It?s going to have it?s good and bad points because you will no longe... [More]
Comment icon #4 Posted by Desertrat56 3 months ago
What you describe is already happening.   In the olden days all phone calls were monitored by computer programs that triggered on key words to add the phone numbers involved into a data base.  What you describe with the iPhone has been going on for 2 decades.   So you think AI is  a good thing?   And it is only legal because we don't complain about it, there are laws that you must be allowed to opt out of getting the advertising "offers". You comment about "good accuracy it will be able to spot crazy people" is naive and "crazy".   You seem to want AI watchdogs and "big brothers" "protecting" ... [More]


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Recent news and articles