The case is still regarded as one of the most compelling and chilling cases of poltergeist activity ever recorded.
There are few paranormal cases as widely debated as the Enfield poltergeist - a spate of chilling paranormal incidents that occurred from 1977 to 1979 at the home of mother-of-four Peggy Hodgson in Enfield, London.
Over the course of 18 months, the unexplained disturbances occurring at the house escalated from items of furniture being shaken to objects being thrown around, loud knocking sounds and - most terrifyingly of all - the alleged possession of 11-year-old Janet, one of Hodgson's four children.
Several people, including multiple police officers, witnessed these events.
Notable researcher Maurice Grosse from the Society for Psychical Research spent significant amounts of time observing and recording the poltergeist activity at the house.
Photographer Graham Morris was also tasked with capturing photographic evidence of the phenomena.
Grosse, in particular, made vast amounts of audio recordings and witnessed multiple examples of alleged poltergeist activity first-hand which included objects being thrown around, furniture moving across the floor and even the levitation of Janet herself.
Things took an even darker turn when the 11-year-old began speaking in a deep, disturbing voice that was said to belong to the spirit of a man who had died in the house.
"There is no way she was doing this for fun," Morris said of Janet's levitation episodes.
"You have got to be mad to actually want to do something like that."
"It was a completely darkened room. If it were the case she were jumping she'd be launching herself at a brick wall or a door in pitch black."
"I think this girl has some sort of force. She is desperate to get this... whatever it is. This energy, this power, whatever she has, across and out to communicate with people."
Even today, it remains unclear what was behind the phenomenon.
While skeptics argue that the voice was put on by Janet herself and that the levitation episodes were faked, others maintain that poltergeist activity really did occur at the house.
Ultimately, though, we may never know for sure what really happened.
Now let me stop you right there Oh please. Everyone on here knows your bias towards anything woo-woo related. If someone knocked a pencil off a desk you'd be screaming "Poltergeiiiiiiist!!!!
A tiny anti-paranormal clique in the world in my eyes. Argumentum ad populum (also called appeal to the people or bandwagon fallacy) is a logical fallacy where someone argues that a belief or action is correct simply because a lot of people believe or do it.
"Non compos mentis" is a Latin term meaning "not of sound mind." In legal contexts, it describes someone who lacks the mental capacity to understand the nature and consequences of their actions or a situation, making them unable to make rational decisions Methinks this is rather apt for you Papamulder.
Was Maurice the one that the Warren's approached,and said something along the lines of "we can make a fortune from this story "? Whoever it was rejected their proposal,and they went on to make a fortune out of it. Maybe he was just too honest and open minded ..unlike the Warren's.
One thing that has always bothered me. When the cameras left ,did the hauntings just stop.? After the family moved out did the new occupants report any activity. ? Since nothing has been reported and I'm assuming the house is occupied now ,that suggests a hoax to me.
I believe that's what Ed Warren said to Maurice and GLP on their one and only visit. The film they made was entirely fiction about their part in the tale. The Tim Spall TV film was miles better. Personally, I think some odd incidents did take place, but were swiftly blown out of all proportion by the girl's attention seeking trickery.
I never heard about anybody else having issues afterwards but some of the neighbours witnessed peculiar things in their own houses apparently. Certainly the family had 'issues' before the whole poltergeist thing kicked off. The parents were not together and one of the children was not at home (you only ever saw about the 2 girls in the reporting at the time). The 'flying' photos are such obvious fakes it is difficult to believe anyone could be fooled by them, plus the younger girl making a gruff voice and clearly enjoying swearing at adults in the footage.
Please Login or Register to post a comment.