Saturday, April 18, 2026
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries Support Us
You are viewing: Home > News > Space & Astronomy > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All ▾
Search Submit

Space & Astronomy

SpaceX and Blue Origin compete to be first to return humans to the Moon

By T.K. Randall
April 14, 2026 · Comment icon 13 comments
HLS
Image: SpaceX and Blue Origin Human Landing Systems
Credit: (PD) NASA
SpaceX and Blue Origin are both building lunar landers for the Artemis program, but only one can get to the Moon first.
Now that Artemis II has successfully returned from its journey around the Moon, all eyes are on next year's Artemis III and, in particular, the lunar lander (or Human Landing System (HLS) vehicle) that will eventually see astronauts walk on the Moon during the subsequent Artemis IV mission.

Both SpaceX and Blue Origin have been developing competing lunar lander vehicles, with Musk's Starship Human Landing System (HLS) being the obvious frontrunner.

Due to delays, however, it looks as though Blue Origin's candidate may also be in with a chance.

Now, according to reports, one or both of the two company's landers may be trialled in orbit during the Artemis III mission, with NASA then selecting the best one for the actual Artemis IV landing.
As such, both company's will now be desperately vying to build the winning candidate.

Both lunar landing systems are far larger than the lunar modules used during the Apollo program while supporting up to four astronauts (as oppose to just two).

The Starship HLS in particular is absolutely gigantic - measuring 52 meters in height (over three times taller than Blue Moon) - while being capable of transporting over 100 tons of cargo.

It could be argued, in fact, that Musk's solution to the problem is overkill, though its enormous size and capacity will no doubt prove invaluable when it comes to building a base on the Moon.

Whether NASA will ultimately favor Musk's behemoth over Blue Origin's more modest landing vehicle remains, for now at least, unclear.

Source: Mail Online | Comments (13)




Other news and articles
Our latest videos Visit us on YouTube
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #4 Posted by EBE Hybrid 3 days ago
I think you're right, they'll probably go with Blue Origin for an Artemis IV landing as it might be quicker and cheaper. I like the idea that Artemis III may be tasked with practicing docking with both systems, like a call back to Project Gemini where they practiced docking with the Agena module 
Comment icon #5 Posted by OverSword 3 days ago
I would be inclined to go with SpaceX due to more experience.
Comment icon #6 Posted by Grim Reaper 6 3 days ago
I agree with you, and because the SpaceX Ship has more than twice the shipping and storage space as all competitors.
Comment icon #7 Posted by OverSword 3 days ago
But larger means exponentially more expensive to launch into orbit which always is a consideration.
Comment icon #8 Posted by Grim Reaper 6 3 days ago
No the cost is low, because the Rockets, Busters, fuel tank and other materials are reusable
Comment icon #9 Posted by OverSword 3 days ago
Good point.
Comment icon #10 Posted by EBE Hybrid 2 days ago
NASAs' SLS (space launch system) the Orion, the rocket used for the Artemis II mission doesn't have reusable rockets, boosters or fuel tank. The 4 x R25 engines are recycled space shuttle engines and as it stands newly manufactured R25 engines won't be used until Artemis V. If you want to nerd out, the shuttle legacy engines have serial numbers beginning E2 and the new engines will have serial numbers beginning E5. The R25 engines retail at approx $100million each. The solid rocket boosters are an upgraded version of the SRBs the shuttle used, they were intended for the Constellation programs ... [More]
Comment icon #11 Posted by Grim Reaper 6 2 days ago
Thanks very much for all the information you certainly have more knowledge on the subject than I do. But my comments were in reference to the SpaceX Rocket Systems being reusable. So, I think there is a miscommunication that occurred, again because I was not talking about the Artemis II mission. Thanks for your reply, sorry for the confusion.
Comment icon #12 Posted by EBE Hybrid 2 days ago
No worries, as it stands all the planned Artemis launches will use the Orion SLS, but they've yet to decide on either the Blue Origin lander or the SpaceX HLS for the lunar landing, either would be launched on an Orion rocket. I think they'll eventually use both for different mission profiles. To get Moonbase components to the moon, HLS. To rotate crew working on the Moonbase, Blue Origin. I hope the next crewed landing on the moon uses the SpaceX HLS though, as it'd probably allow for a longer mission on the surface 
Comment icon #13 Posted by Grim Reaper 6 2 days ago
Thanks very much for understanding, I also hope they use the SpaceX HLS. Because like you say, it will certainly extend the length of time on the moon which will be cool. Thanks for your post....


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Recent news and articles