Thursday, May 21, 2026
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries Support Us
You are viewing: Home > News > Extraterrestrial > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All ▾
Search Submit

Extraterrestrial

Space missions could be missing signs of alien life, scientists warn

By T.K. Randall
May 21, 2026 · Comment icon 14 comments

Image Credit: Courtesy NASA/JPL-Caltech
There's a chance that evidence of alien life has been under our noses for years and we have failed to see it.
Most people will be familiar with the term 'false positive' with regard to the search for alien life, which is when a result - such as an analysis of a soil sample on Mars - shows the presence of extraterrestrial organisms when in actual fact there are none.

A famous example of this was when NASA's Viking 1 lander seemed to have detected signs of life on Mars - a result that is today generally believed to have been a false positive.

But what if the opposite could also happen - a 'false negative' as it were ?

In other words, what if Mars rovers and landers have been sitting right on top of concrete evidence of alien life for decades but every test has still come back negative ?
"We should be aware of these false-negative results," said astrobiologist Inge Loes ten Kate, lead author of a study investigating the consequences of such a scenario.

"It means there are shortcomings in recognizing the existence of life."

"These shortcomings are not yet high on the research agenda."

Ten Kate, and colleagues, are now advocating for new research strategies designed to assess the risks of potential false negatives and how to address them.

"The search for signs of life should go hand in hand with better-defined questions and testable hypotheses to justify specific measurement or observation targets," she said.

Source: Phys.org | Comments (14)




Other news and articles
Our latest videos Visit us on YouTube
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #5 Posted by flying squid 3 hours ago
Europa (Jupiter) and Enceladus (Saturn) are the two most promising "ocean worlds" in our solar system, I will wait with the final answer to the question 'Are we alone in the Universe' first after I see a results of the lunar missions to these moons.              
Comment icon #6 Posted by Grim Reaper 6 3 hours ago
Like what has been said above, life in general doesn't only include intelligent life. But I agree with your thoughts on subject, it is best to wait and see if life is found within our Solar System first...
Comment icon #7 Posted by Hazzard 2 hours ago
The universe is under no obligation to make sense to you - Neil deGrasse Tyson. Having that said, I do believe there are microbial life (even in our own styrsystem)... and maybe even intelligent civilizations out there.  
Comment icon #8 Posted by Grim Reaper 6 2 hours ago
I like the quote, by not the guy. I can't put my finger on it but he just gets under my skin. I know we are in agreement on the subject of life in the Universe, because I have read many of your posts on the subject. Hopefully, It will be proven without a doubt in the near future whether it's upon Mars or another planetary system in our Solar System....
Comment icon #9 Posted by Hazzard 2 hours ago
It might be that fake laugh he throws around all the time, or maybe the overly dramatic tone. Apart from that, I kind of like the guy. Brian Cox is one of my favorite science guys, though. 
Comment icon #10 Posted by Grim Reaper 6 2 hours ago
I am not familiar with Brian Cox....As far as, Tyson is concerned I think your right what you wrote above is why I don't like listening to him....
Comment icon #11 Posted by Hazzard 2 hours ago
  Neither is "better" scientifically, its mostly just different communication styles. Cox feels more soothing and atmospheric, Tyson more entertaining and performance driven... kinda annoying. 
Comment icon #12 Posted by Grim Reaper 6 2 hours ago
I see, it sounds like Cox is much more pleasant to listen to, and your right I do find Tyson annoying that was a good way to put it....
Comment icon #13 Posted by iAlrakis 1 hour ago
The lady has a point but how do you define search criteria if you don't know what you are looking for?
Comment icon #14 Posted by Grim Reaper 6 1 hour ago
That's a very good point, it makes perfect sense that she would need search criteria to conduct the research she is discussing. So, it all seems kinda strange as the article is currently written..


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Top 10 trending mysteries
Recent news and articles