Monday, April 24, 2017
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help   RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos
Find: in

Possible exomoon candidate discovered


Posted on Friday, 11 April, 2014 | Comment icon 41 comments

Could scientists have discovered a moon orbiting a distant planet ? Image Credit: NASA/JPL
Scientists have identified what could be a natural satellite orbiting a planet in another solar system.
The discovery was made quite by accident by astronomers observing a rare galactic alignment using telescopes in New Zealand and Tasmania.

It will be difficult to determine for sure if the object is indeed a moon, but if it is then it could be the first to be discovered outside of our own solar system.

"We won't have a chance to observe the exomoon candidate again," said lead study author David Bennett. "But we can expect more unexpected finds like this."

The discovery was made possible thanks to a technique known as gravitational microlensing in which a star passing in front of a more distant star can magnify and focus the light of the one behind it.

Source: NASA.gov | Comments (41)

Tags: Exomoon, Extrasolar Planet


 
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #32 Posted by DieChecker on 15 April, 2014, 5:43
I think you have hugely underestimated the difficulty of the task. My point is that it is something that could be done. Pluto is three and a half million times closer to us than this possible exoplanet.Light obeys an inverse square law, in other word, double the distance and the light is only a quarter as bright. Triple the distance and the light is one ninth as bright Which is why you use a laser that focuses the light energy into a beam, right? Though it disperses at the same rate, starting with a beam that is already very narrow allows the wattage per area to retain a lot of energy over a l... [More]
Comment icon #33 Posted by taniwha on 15 April, 2014, 10:29
Wow this topic has really been derailed hasn't it? It has very little to do with exoplanets any more!!! The speed of light in a vacuum is a universal hard limit. Light can travel slower in other mediums. Therefore it is possible for sound to travel faster than light in these circumstances, but the sound is not travelling faster than the speed of light (which IS the speed of light in a vacuum). I hope that made sense. All of which seems be lost on tanwha who simply does not see that his idea is unworkable. So what your saying is that in a vaccuum a tortoise travels faster than sound, yeah yeah.... [More]
Comment icon #34 Posted by JesseCuster on 15 April, 2014, 16:47
Not totally true. Radio telescopes are used as radar systems. There are several topics on this site that I have posted showing radar images (movies in some cases) of asteroids made using this technique. It was also used to measure the rotation speeds of Venus and Mercury before the advent of space probes. A fair point, but I don't fancy scaling that idea up to trying to detect craters on a moon that's hundreds of light years away as opposed mere astronomical units away.
Comment icon #35 Posted by JesseCuster on 15 April, 2014, 17:01
Of course not. A star casts light not shadow. Your point please?A remark like that makes me realise that any further discussion is clearly not going to be productive.
Comment icon #36 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf on 15 April, 2014, 17:43
A remark like that makes me realise that any further discussion is clearly not going to be productive. I have to agree that it does rather highlight a stunning lack of understanding of extraordinarily basic science. tanwha, what exactly do you think a shadow is? How do you think they are formed? Edited to add: Whilst we are at it, what do you think sound is? These are very basic concepts which you have demonstrated no understanding of at all. If you don't understand what light and sound are (and you really don't seem to) how do you think you are in a position to determine what is and isn't pos... [More]
Comment icon #37 Posted by spacecowboy342 on 16 April, 2014, 2:06
My point is that it is something that could be done. Which is why you use a laser that focuses the light energy into a beam, right? Though it disperses at the same rate, starting with a beam that is already very narrow allows the wattage per area to retain a lot of energy over a longer distance. It is a function of the energy into the beam and the focus of the beam. I did say we'd need titanic sensor arrays that would be cripplingly expensive. How hard would it be to sense a return signal from the Moon, without a mirror, using every major telescope in North America in array? I've read that wit... [More]
Comment icon #38 Posted by DieChecker on 16 April, 2014, 4:30
You are going to aim this laser at a point where this moon is going to be in 3200 years and hope your receiver is lined up to receive the signal in 6400 years? Sounds like a long shot at best Totally. I think I'll spend the money elsewhere.
Comment icon #39 Posted by taniwha on 16 April, 2014, 8:12
A remark like that makes me realise that any further discussion is clearly not going to be productive. Strictly speaking you are right. It was nice talking with you.
Comment icon #40 Posted by taniwha on 16 April, 2014, 8:35
I have to agree that it does rather highlight a stunning lack of understanding of extraordinarily basic science. tanwha, what exactly do you think a shadow is? How do you think they are formed? My answer was rhetorical. Edited to add: Whilst we are at it, what do you think sound is? My question was rhetorical. These are very basic concepts which you have demonstrated no understanding of at all. If you don't understand what light and sound are (and you really don't seem to) how do you think you are in a position to determine what is and isn't possible? Thats a very big IF.
Comment icon #41 Posted by Harte on 16 April, 2014, 16:51
So what your saying is that in a vaccuum a tortoise travels faster than sound, yeah yeah. So tell me where does sound energy go in a vaccuum. Has anyone even turned speakers on in outer space to test it out? Not to my knowledge. But in my Physics class, the students observed that sound doesn't travel in a vacuum by pumping the air out of a chamber containing a speaker. Sound energy doesn't reach a vacuum, since the energy of sound involves the compression and rarefication of a substance (like a gas, a liquid or a solid.) Harte


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


  On the forums
Voynich manuscript 'written in two languages'
4-24-2017
Russian scholars have been making headway in deciphering the pages of the mysterious medieval text.
Japan's 'burning pavement' mystery solved
4-23-2017
Authorities in Japan have determined how a stretch of city pavement has been burning people's feet.
Pigeon makes its nest inside woman's kitchen
4-23-2017
When Genevieve Roman returned to her apartment recently she discovered that she had a new roommate.
Fossilized dinosaur eggs unearthed in China
4-23-2017
Discovered near Foshan in the southeast of the country, the eggs date back over 70 million years.
Featured Videos
Gallery icon 
Boiling water meets freezing air
Posted 4-24-2017 | 1 comment
A look at what happens when you throw boiling water out in to the freezing Russian winter air.
 
Cave-dwelling spiders
Posted 4-23-2017 | 3 comments
A new species of spider has been found living in caves and mine shafts in Mexico.
 
The human bridge of musicality
Posted 4-22-2017 | 1 comment
A look at how the human brain perceives the concept of music and how it is processed.
 
Swarm of locusts
Posted 4-21-2017 | 0 comments
A look at the extreme destructive power of an enormous swarm of desert locusts.
 
Lawrence Krauss on optimism
Posted 4-20-2017 | 0 comments
Physicist Lawrence Krauss discusses the fact that the universe doesn't care about us at all.
 
 View: More videos
Stories & Experiences
Grandpa's visit
4-14-2017 | Portugal
 
Mysterious dog
4-14-2017 | Utah
 
A night to remember
4-14-2017 | Philippines
 
 
Am I going crazy ?
3-30-2017 | South Africa
 
 
Sleep paralysis or my father ?
3-30-2017 | Los Angeles
 
My nightly occurrences
2-28-2017 | Manchester, UK
 
Saved by a stranger
2-7-2017 | Green River Wyoming
 
Spooky sense
2-4-2017 | India
 

         More stories | Send us your story
 
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.7 Unexplained-Mysteries.com 2001-2017
Privacy Policy and Disclaimer   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ