Friday, May 6, 2016   |   5,429 users online
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help   RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos  ·  Chat
Find: in

New habitable extrasolar planet discovered

Posted on Saturday, 28 June, 2014 | Comment icon 40 comments

Artist's rendering of Gliese 832c. Image Credit: PHL/UPR Arecibo/NASA
Located 16 light years away, Gliese 832c has been identified as one of the best places to look for life.
Discovered by Robert A Wittenbyer from the University of New South Wales, the new planet is thought to have a mass five times that of the Earth and orbits its parent red dwarf star once every 36 days.

Despite these differences however Gliese 832c is a prime candidate in the hunt for habitable Earth-like worlds. Located within its star's habitable zone, the planet is believed to be one of the top most likely places to find life outside of our solar system.

"The planet might have Earth-like temperatures, albeit with large seasonal shifts, given a similar terrestrial atmosphere," astronomers wrote.

"This makes Gliese 832c one of the top three most Earth-like planets according to the ESI (i.e. with respect to Earth's stellar flux and mass) and the closest one to Earth of all three, a prime object for follow-up observations."

Source: Yahoo! News | Comments (40)

Tags: Extrasolar Planet, Life

Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #31 Posted by Noteverythingisaconspiracy on 3 July, 2014, 8:12
I got a 9/9 Given the nature of the questions, getting only 5 right is not something I would brag about, they are mostly pretty basic stuff.
Comment icon #32 Posted by taniwha on 3 July, 2014, 11:23
But there is no evidence that red dwarfs poison all of their planets and render them lifeless. But I suppose anything is possible. Like life on red dwarf planets being possible for instance. Until science can confirm just one red dwarf system lifeless, which means each earthly or watery planet it has is thoroughly examined tip to toe, odds that life does or does not exist in such systems remain equal. How can this be a lie? I simply choose to think a positive over a negative. Are you always so easily offended by what people think? My decision is based on science, that a red dwarf is... [More]
Comment icon #33 Posted by taniwha on 3 July, 2014, 11:31
Cool, keep me posted if your ever wrong now, you hear!
Comment icon #34 Posted by Noteverythingisaconspiracy on 3 July, 2014, 16:31
I am not the one that is continually showing my ignorance of astronomy and physics. There is nothing wrong with not knowing a lot about these subjects, people have different interests. But you keep posting about astronomy as if you know a lot about the subject, while it is painfully obvious that you don't. Why don't you educate yourself on the subject instead of lookin foolish all the time ? This is just a friendly suggestion. PS: I will keep you posted, but I am never wrong.
Comment icon #35 Posted by toast on 3 July, 2014, 17:58
Comment icon #36 Posted by Frank Merton on 4 July, 2014, 8:55
Red dwarfs do last an awfully long time -- an order of magnitude or more longer than the sun (by last I mean stay on the main sequence). Therefore any life there could be there a long time. At least early in their lives they tend to be unstable and shoot off flares the sun would certainly envy but any life nearby would not. Maybe they settle down, but even so just one every million years or so ain't healthy -- indeed, less so as life in such a regime does not evolve, even if it could, any sort of defense. Also relevant is the fact that planets orbiting a red dwarf necessarily are much ... [More]
Comment icon #37 Posted by taniwha on 4 July, 2014, 10:24
Yes i agree Perhaps, i think the big question is if an atmosphere can provide the necassary protection. Or water. Or caves. Or moons . Are you sure all the planets will be tidally locked though? Billions of red dwarfs means billions of planets means billions of combinations. This link is interesting it confirms all your doubts and adresses the complications which might befall hypothetical living organisms on these planet types. True, if we get the opportunity to reach just one of these planets though, we should analyse it with the same de... [More]
Comment icon #38 Posted by GlennThe14TH on 12 July, 2014, 2:10
Jeepers, but 5 times the mass! Conventional science says we might be able to get there quickly enough, assuming we survived the impact, but moving around would be a big problem!
Comment icon #39 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf on 12 July, 2014, 2:30
Moving around would be the least of your problems, see .
Comment icon #40 Posted by taniwha on 13 July, 2014, 10:13
We need to get closer to these planets to get closer to the truth, thats the only way we can eliminate the earthlikes for sure. Or listen here to the broadcast...

Please Login or Register to post a comment.

  On the forums
Forum posts:
Forum topics:
Users online:
DNA to help solve Leonardo da Vinci mystery
Scientists are hoping to extract DNA from skin and hair samples found on some of Da Vinci's paintings.
'Jacuzzi of Despair' found in Gulf of Mexico
A strange circular pocket of super-salty water has been discovered 3,300ft below the surface of the sea.
Mystery of ancient Nazca spiral wells solved
Researchers have managed to solve two mysteries pertaining to Peru's enigmatic Nazca civilization.
Humanoid robot is preparing to go in to space
Known as Valkyrie, the NASA robot could help to set up a colony ahead of the first astronauts on Mars.
Featured Videos
Gallery icon 
Building a record-breaking house of cards
Posted 5-6-2016 | 0 comments
Bryan Berg builds a huge house of cards on top of a running washing machine.
Why is the sound of chewing so annoying ?
Posted 5-5-2016 | 3 comments
A look at why chewing and other irritating sounds can cause so much distress.
Inside a 6ft air balloon
Posted 5-4-2016 | 1 comment
The Slo Mo Guys record footage of what happens when the balloon you are inside pops.
Catching a mutated som in Chernobyl
Posted 5-3-2016 | 0 comments
Extreme angler Jeremy Wade ventures to Chernobyl to catch a rather unique specimen.
How does an owl fly so silently ?
Posted 5-2-2016 | 1 comment
Researchers record an owl in flight to determine how it flies without making a sound.
 View: More videos
Stories & Experiences
Not in our jurisdiction
5-2-2016 | California, United States
Zippers and headlights
5-2-2016 | Raleigh, United States
Spinning, voiceless and breathless
5-2-2016 | Garland, Texas
4-15-2016 | United States
The mysterious awakening
4-6-2016 | Los Angeles, California
Chocolate fairy? Really?
4-6-2016 | United Kingdom
Christmas Day haunting
4-6-2016 | London, UK
The funeral director
3-30-2016 | Hebburn, England
A strange sighting in Spain
3-30-2016 | Albatera, Spain
Dust patterns on basement floor
3-27-2016 | Smithville, Texas

         More stories | Send us your story
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.6 2001-2015
Privacy Policy and Disclaimer   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ