Brock interviewed the witnesses while investigating the case. Image Credit: YouTube / Bill Brock
Bill Brock has been investigating two recordings which show a mysterious figure out in the woods.
The Bigfoot hunter and researcher is so convinced that this case is the real deal that he has even likened the videos to the infamous footage recorded by Roger Patterson and Bob Gimlin in 1967.
"I'm not telling you that this is Sasquatch," he said.
"I'm telling you we either have a bunch of things that are lining up to be the most convincing evidence since the Patterson-Gimlin video or this is a really amazing hoax."
There were two videos, the first was recorded by a 12-year-old boy on his phone:
The second video, which was recorded earlier by the boy's father, is included in this short documentary which follows Brock as he investigates the sightings and interviews the witnesses.
During the video he also takes a look at some unusual footprints found at the scene.
What is sad, that Bear was walking like that because its front paws were injured...... And they just leave it alone, to heal on it's own...( if it will ) That seems a bit harsh. Especially when you see in those wildlife documentaries in Africa,where they intervene with tranquillisers to help injured elephants and such. Maybe there is a reason why they won't step in with local bears. Could be a cost issue?
That seems a bit harsh. Especially when you see in those wildlife documentaries in Africa,where they intervene with tranquillisers to help injured elephants and such. Maybe there is a reason why they won't step in with local bears. Could be a cost issue? It is because there are a lot of them. They can become a " nuisance " if they go into neighborhoods. I think they feel one less Bear to worry about myself.
Did you see the stats from 2011?..... Here is one from 2013, but not as easy to use....Unless you know your states. Just saying... The wildlife polls are not even usually 90% correct. They just audit a tiny representative fraction of the wilderness and then interpolate the total. It has been shown that at times this way of figuring wild populations can be way, way off. Animals with huge populations and animals with tiny populations are generally accurate, but the intermediate populations can sometimes be way off.
Just saying... The wildlife polls are not even usually 90% correct. They just audit a tiny representative fraction of the wilderness and then interpolate the total. It has been shown that at times this way of figuring wild populations can be way, way off. Animals with huge populations and animals with tiny populations are generally accurate, but the intermediate populations can sometimes be way off. They do the counts for hunting tags, and fishing ( Salmon, Crabs ).....It is pretty accurate. I helped Nevada Department of Wildlife do their Sagehen ( Grouse ) counts for a few years. Either way, ... [More]
They do the counts for hunting tags, and fishing ( Salmon, Crabs ).....It is pretty accurate. I helped Nevada Department of Wildlife do their Sagehen ( Grouse ) counts for a few years. Either way, off topic, and was just pointing out a mistake in a post. If by accurate you mean within the same order of magnitude, yeah.
[/size] If by accurate you mean within the same order of magnitude, yeah. What are you using as your base number?......To compare the estimates to? I am saying the educated estimates ( by trained professionals in this field ) are close enough to say what state has more or less black bear in it......And, to use for distributing hunting tags.
so anyways.......................... apparently the kid who filmed it has confessed (or was forced to confess) it was a hoax.................. http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.com/2015/01/shocking-info-exposed-turner-bigfoot.html BEST - Ron
What are you using as your base number?......To compare the estimates to? I am saying the educated estimates ( by trained professionals in this field ) are close enough to say what state has more or less black bear in it......And, to use for distributing hunting tags. That is all true. It is just sometimes the next year they have a 50% increase in their estimates, or a 25% reduction in their estimates, due to population density of whatever area they counted. So saying 12,000 in one state is more then 10,000 in another is really a worthless statement, because they both could be way off. I'm emp... [More]
so anyways.......................... apparently the kid who filmed it has confessed (or was forced to confess) it was a hoax.................. http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.com/2015/01/shocking-info-exposed-turner-bigfoot.html BEST - Ron Wow haha
Please Login or Register to post a comment.