Thursday, May 1, 2025
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries Support Us
You are viewing: Home > News > Creatures, Myths & Legends > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All ▾
Search Submit

Creatures, Myths & Legends

Top scientist was sacked over Nessie sighting

By T.K. Randall
April 20, 2015 · Comment icon 12 comments

The eminent scientist claimed he'd seen an Elasmosaurus in Loch Ness. Image Credit: CC 2.0 Dave Conner
In 1959, Dr. Denys Tucker of the Natural History Museum claimed to have seen the Loch Ness Monster.
An eminent zoologist and eel expert, Dr. Tucker was a respected scientist who climbed to the position of the museum's principal scientific officer within the space of only eight years.

In 1959 however his career suffered an unrelenting downward turn following his insistance that he had witnessed an unknown creature in the waters of Scotland's Loch Ness, a claim that would prove highly popular among the general public but extremely controversial among his peers at the museum.

At the time Dr. Tucker had concluded that the creature must have been an Elasmosaurus, a large plesiosaur with a long neck that was thought to have gone extinct over 80 million years ago.

"I am quite satisfied that we have in Loch Ness one of the most exciting and important findings of British zoology today," he wrote in a letter to New Scientist.
His obsessive interest in the phenomenon however did not go down well with his fellow scientists who deemed the topic to be inappropriate for someone working at such a prestigious museum.

The controversy continued to escalate until in 1960 he was fired by director Dr. Morrison-Scott. Tucker fought back with a high-profile lawsuit that even went as far as the Court of Appeal, but in the end he failed to achieve victory over his employers and his plight faded in to obscurity.

What he had actually seen in the loch that day in 1959 however continues to remain a mystery.

Source: Market Business News | Comments (12)




Other news and articles
Our latest videos Visit us on YouTube
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #3 Posted by paperdyer 10 years ago
The only way to try to prove this once and for all would be to put a small sub in the loch and go Nessie hunting. If this has been done already and nothing was found, well........
Comment icon #4 Posted by maximusnow 10 years ago
How do we discover anything new, if your considered insane or untrustworthy for looking? The lesson is if you see a bigfoot, do not tell anyone unless you have a dead body to prove it.
Comment icon #5 Posted by Useldinger 10 years ago
Are there any restrictions to private expeditions into Loch Ness? I've heard about a few of those and none of those found a cryptid...
Comment icon #6 Posted by stereologist 10 years ago
It seems to some that it is fine and dandy for someone making a claim for which there is no proof. The animal that was being suggested really makes no sense. It is a large air breathing animal that must have a breeding population. The other issue is that the article does not discuss the manner in which the sighting was reported. That often makes a big difference in how it is perceived. It does suggest that he was obsessive. Did he neglect other duties? All we see is that the lawsuit he filed failed. A synopsis of the arguments would be of interest to make a decision about the nature of the fir... [More]
Comment icon #7 Posted by Codenwarra 10 years ago
I distrust stories like this. What the text says might be factual but it is probably only a fraction of the story.
Comment icon #8 Posted by Myles 10 years ago
I distrust stories like this. What the text says might be factual but it is probably only a fraction of the story. Yep. It is quite possible that he neglected his work and kept pushing the wrong people.
Comment icon #9 Posted by QuasiBeliever 10 years ago
I have a hard time believing that Dr. Tucker was dismissed only for claiming to have seen Nessie. If you read deeper into this and other articles on the same subject, apparently the young doctor was a bit refractory. So, in the field of science, you can either choose to believe in cryptids or be a naughty boy; never both! Either that or just don't let it be known that you thought you saw a dinosaur, no matter what happened to be in your pipe at the time.
Comment icon #10 Posted by Podo 10 years ago
I think the method of dismissal matters. If he said "hey I saw this" and they freaked out, that's a bad time. If he let it consume him to the detriment of his work, then he needed to go.
Comment icon #11 Posted by PersonFromPorlock 10 years ago
Parliamentary Question about the dismissal: http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/commons/1961/feb/03/natural-history-museum-dr-tucker Nothing about Nessie there, and while it's apparent the fix was in, it doesn't appear to have been 'in' for any reason beyond bureaucratic inertia.
Comment icon #12 Posted by aquatus1 10 years ago
We're seriously talking about a guy who got fired in 1960?


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Recent news and articles