Friday, July 10, 2020
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help    |   Cookie Policy    |   Privacy Policy    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos
Find: in

61% of Americans want full UFO disclosure

Posted on Wednesday, 12 February, 2020 | Comment icon 95 comments

What are your thoughts on UFOs ? Image Credit: PD - Max Pixel
A new poll has revealed what Americans really think about UFOs, Area 51 and government cover-ups.
Last month we reported that the UK's Royal Air Force (RAF) would be making its UFO files public - news that has since been met with a great deal of interest on both sides of the pond.

Now a new poll conducted by market research site Pipilsay has highlighted what Americans really think about the topic of UFOs and the possibility that the government knows more than it is letting on.

50% of respondents were enthusiastic about the news of the UK's X-Files being published, while 34% believed that it would "create unnecessary madness". In total, around 61% of respondents said that they wanted the US government to take similar steps to declassify information about UFOs.

58% of those polled thought that the government had been secretly investigating alien life and 39% believed that Area 51 in Nevada had been heavily involved in this research.
On the subject of UFOs in general, 27% of respondents said that they are 'real' (presumably meaning that they believe them to be alien in origin), 25% said that the phenomenon can be explained through conventional means and 9% thought that the whole thing is one big hoax.

77% even claimed to have seen a UFO with their own eyes.

A parallel survey conducted in the UK found that 60% were excited about the UFO files being published, however only 23% believed UFOs to be alien in origin.

Despite this, slightly more - 78% - claimed to have seen a UFO in person.

Source: | Comments (95)

Tags: UFO

Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #86 Posted by WanderingFool0 on 16 February, 2020, 23:23
Well, we can agree to disagree. I think at the end of the day national security is often invoked and many of those agents will willing keep the secret for the good of the nation and the people and if they don't they will dealt with. And i think they are cleverer than you think. After all they often use incompentency as a cover for corruption and out right treason. Much like 9/11. You can believe the intelligence agencies were incompetent and dropped the ball because they don't really talk to each other, but I will continue to believe that incompetence is covering for the fact they damn well kn... [More]
Comment icon #87 Posted by Habitat on 16 February, 2020, 23:31
There is public will for matters of national security to involve secrecy, there being potentially enemies of the state, that information needs to be hidden from. That there would be widespread public will to make a secret out of proof of the existence of alien spacecraft, of a kind currently not in the public domain, is vastly less likely. The clamour is in the other direction.
Comment icon #88 Posted by WanderingFool0 on 16 February, 2020, 23:33
Yes but the government gets to decide what is a matter of national security, not the public I would also add, not even all of congress is privy to all the matter of national security only those on special panels. And of those only what they are told. †
Comment icon #89 Posted by Habitat on 16 February, 2020, 23:36
The gubmint and the public are intersecting sets. As I say, where there is no apparent need for secrecy, and huge public demand for disclosure, leaking is inevitable. The leaker would become a pop hero. I am quite convinced there are inexplicable UFO's, I am not convinced anyone has the scoop on what they are.
Comment icon #90 Posted by WanderingFool0 on 16 February, 2020, 23:39
i think Eisenhower and I would disagree. I don't think the public government, has much real knowledge and control over the military/industrial/intelligence complex.
Comment icon #91 Posted by Habitat on 16 February, 2020, 23:44
You think they have control over UFO's. I don't think anyone has a bead on the phenomenon. I tend to think they are a manifestation of something we can't even imagine. Otherwise capture (of some convincing kind) would already have occurred, and be in the public domain. It is just too big to conceal.
Comment icon #92 Posted by preacherman76 on 17 February, 2020, 0:42
Iím not saying the government has ever had contact or anything like that, but I have little doubt they know more than us about UFOís.† † I think the idea that the government is incapable of keeping secrets isnít well thought out.†
Comment icon #93 Posted by LeonKennedy on 17 February, 2020, 2:11
There's been plenty of well documented cases in modern history to prove the existence of atleast other beings that we don't quite know where they come from. People who've had real experiences and even have PTSD from them. It's selfish of you and demeaning for you to downplay those very real experiences.† Who are you to take that away from them just because YOU decided they don't fit into your bubble of existence? Try getting out of that bubble one day,† you might realize the world isn't as black and white as you see it. Or who knows.... ignorance is bliss as they say.†
Comment icon #94 Posted by Nuclear Wessel on 18 February, 2020, 15:42
Well, where are they, then? I have yet to encounter a single "case" that didn't have a more logical, rational explanation for it. Surely you can't be serious in your assertion that these are "proof" of the existence of "other beings of unknown origin". † I don't think he is denying that people have had experiences that resulted in PTSD, rather downplaying the contents of the experience as not being real... which they were not. No verifiable evidence has ever been produced that did not have a terrestrial explanation.† I don't think he sees it as black and white, and he was offering a rational, ... [More]
Comment icon #95 Posted by Timothy on 22 February, 2020, 3:27
If most governments had any technology like that, they would never release it,†and would try to reverse engineer it. Too much risk to release into public domain.†

Please Login or Register to post a comment.

  On the forums
'10ft lake monster' caught on camera in China
Footage showing an unidentified creature lurking in the water of a Chinese lake has appeared on social media.
Moon 'gel' mystery has finally been solved
Scientists have revealed what the mysterious gel-like substance found on the lunar surface actually is.
Penguins can fire their own droppings over 4ft
If there's one place you don't want to stand, it's within around 4ft of the back of a Humboldt penguin.
Tiny dinosaur was the size of a coffee cup
Scientists have discovered a pint-sized dinosaur that was so small you could literally hold it in your hand.
Stories & Experiences
Grim reaper-like visitation
6-16-2020 | Canada
My monster catfish story
6-15-2020 | Dallas texas
Orb of light in room
5-9-2020 | USA/Texas/Waco
Not sleeping alone
5-9-2020 | Los Angeles
Glowing red eyes
5-9-2020 | Fields, Louisiana
Two creature sightings
5-1-2020 | Augusta and Louisana
My haunted home
5-1-2020 | Rainham, Essex, UK

         More stories | Send us your story
Featured Videos
Gallery icon 
NASA studies underwater 'white smoker' vents
Posted 4-17-2020 | 3 comments
Hydrothermal vents on the ocean floor can teach us about possible habitats on other worlds.
10 strange things about our solar system
Posted 3-17-2020 | 0 comments
A look at some of the most mysterious things about our solar system.
Lizzie - Scotland's other loch monster
Posted 3-8-2020 | 0 comments
Amelia Dimoldenberg investigates the Loch Ness Monster's neighbor.
Adam Savage and Spot
Posted 2-14-2020 | 4 comments
Adam Savage tests out Boston Dynamics' impressive Spot robot.
NASA 2020: Are you ready ?
Posted 1-1-2020 | 3 comments
A look at what's coming up in the world of spaceflight this year.
 View: More videos
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.712 (c) 2001-2020
Terms   |   Privacy Policy   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ