Wednesday, May 25, 2016
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help   RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos
Find: in

Trekker takes photograph of 'Yeti footprints'


Posted on Monday, 1 February, 2016 | Comment icon 58 comments

The Himalayas are said to be home to the legendary Yeti. Image Credit: CC BY-SA 2.0 Dirk Hartung
Steve Berry encountered a mysterious set of single-file tracks on a steep mountain slope in Bhutan.
The 66-year-old had been trekking along a remote pass in the Himalayan Mountains when he came across the trail which was situated only yards away from an impassable chasm.

"The local people said we were the first to ever set foot on that pass," he said. "I had always thought that stories about the yeti were a bit of old bunkum. But there is no denying these tracks existed."

"The prints were clearly visible with the naked eye from where we were standing on a pass at 17,800ft. There was a vertical drop in front of us, not to mention a very serious mountainside to cross, so we could not get to them."


Not everyone is convinced however that the prints represent evidence of the Abominable Snowman.

Cryptozoologist Jon Downes, director of the Center for Fortean Zoology, believes that the tracks in the picture are more likely to be those of a mountain goat than a large hominid.

"I think that the chances of these prints being from anything more interesting are negligible and it is certainly not a bipedal higher primate," he said. "The center of gravity for such an animal would mean it just wouldn’t be able to venture up a mountain like that."

Source: Mail Online | Comments (58)

Tags: Yeti, Bhutan


 
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #49 Posted by Horta on 11 February, 2016, 3:11
If you believe your biologist is part of genuine scientific expeditions to look for bigfoot, good for you. Open to interpretation I suppose, you could claim any casual stroll in the woods "looking for bigfoot" if imagination permits. This doesn't seem to have happened since the early "Tom Slick" financed expeditions that found nothing. Scientists that are really looking document their research and if they find something worthwhile, submit it to journals. Except for bigfoot "scientists" that is. There isn't a scientific journal for random and unlikely big... [More]
Comment icon #50 Posted by PrisonerX on 11 February, 2016, 13:11
Bindernagel's research is published in a book and is therefore available for scrutiny. That you will not do the reading is on you. Until you do, however, you're in no position to declare it as unscientific. You cannot just say that there are no scientists looking because you want to, it doesn't work that way. I've already proven you wrong by citing one. Lol of course it's seen by people more frequently around places were there are people more frequently. That makes perfect sense. Like I have already explained, most people do not go into the remote regions. That you thin... [More]
Comment icon #51 Posted by DieChecker on 12 February, 2016, 14:20
Snow leopard tracks sometimes appear to be in a straight line.
Comment icon #52 Posted by PrisonerX on 14 February, 2016, 22:38
Snow leopards are awesome. Assuming a Yeti footprint is similar to a Sasquatch footprint, what would set it apart from a snow leopard's trail, aside from the anatomical features of the print itself, would be the stride length. A four legged creature, such as the snow leopard, wouldn't exhibit the same kind of sustained long stride that a large bipedal creature like the Sasquatch/Yeti is reported to display. A sustained long stride is one of the track features that makes cases like the 1851 Arkansas case I spoke of earlier ITT quite interesting. Anyway, you may be correct about the ... [More]
Comment icon #53 Posted by Horta on 16 February, 2016, 8:39
The same way alien research, quantum health, free energy and comics are also published in books and available for scrutiny. Anyone can publish a book. If you want science to take it seriously, there is a proper way to go about it. You might take note of the way Sykes went about it. Gather the best "claimed" bigfoot evidence he could get. Then perform experiment. Then publish results in peer reviewed science journal so that other scientists will scrutinise it. Try to gain a consensus about results of experiments. Then publish stuff for 'footers. Bigfoot "science" avoid... [More]
Comment icon #54 Posted by PrisonerX on 16 February, 2016, 16:28
The few scientists investigating the evidence are rightfully hesitant to submit papers to institutions that have little interest in taking them seriously. Much was learned from the plight of Grover Kantz. You might want to take note. With the unfortunate muddying of the waters by hoaxes, it's basically become taboo to entertain the notion seriously, and therefore can jeopardize one's career and funding. This is admittedly the reason Bindernagel has been relatively quiet in that regard, while still making an effort. You have to understand, there is a business side to scientific resear... [More]
Comment icon #55 Posted by Myles on 16 February, 2016, 16:41
You are spinning again. Below are 2 scientific studies that were done and submitted. If these do not "jeopardize one's career and funding", I don't think bigfoot would. Of course, that would entail having actual evidence. A study was conducted at the Babraham Institute to determine whether sheep were capable of recognizing the faces of other sheep. When the study concluded in 2001, the researchers had discovered that sheep could recognize the faces of fifty sheep about 80% of the time, and they remembered them for over two years, which is much better than my own sheep facia... [More]
Comment icon #56 Posted by Horta on 18 February, 2016, 6:29
Ah those pesky skeptics always moving the goalposts with their strawmen tactics like...asking for evidence sufficient to back claims, pointing out obvious inconsistencies. lol. It's obvious science refuses to look at bigfoot reflected in the way they bent over backwards to help Ketchum publish her paper (it was never rejected, it was withdrawn), the way the editor of Nature went out of his way to write an article encouraging Cryptozoology to "come in from the cold" and join real science by publishing, over a decade ago. The way the Sykes study which promised to objectively stud... [More]
Comment icon #57 Posted by Horta on 18 February, 2016, 12:34
Biologists aren't expert bigfoot trackers (or necessarily trackers at all). Anthropologists aren't expert bigfoot trackers (or necessarily trackers at all). None of them have studied the foot of their proposed bigfoot, nor does anyone have one available for study. Therefore none of them are in a position to credit them to bigfoot. This is conjecture based on personal belief (pseudo science). It isn't necessary to call bs. It is necessary for the claimants to support the claim. The science community at large have called bs on these unsupported claims by finding them irrelevant.


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


  On the forums
'Human dog' appears in daytime TV interview
5-25-2016
Sound technician Tom Peters likes nothing more than to dress up in a latex costume and act like a dog.
Woman stalked by swarm of bees for 24 hours
5-25-2016
Carol Howarth was shocked to discover that a swarm of 20,000 bees had followed her car all the way home.
Australian town is invaded by 100,000 bats
5-24-2016
Batemans Bay in New South Wales has become so overrun that a state of emergency has been declared.
Warning goes out over 'vampire fish' in UK
5-24-2016
Swimmers have been urged to be on the lookout due to a rise in the number of blood-sucking sea lampreys.
Featured Videos
Gallery icon 
What happened before the Big Bang ?
Posted 5-22-2016 | 4 comments
Is it possible to find out what took place before our universe came in to existence ?
 
Prehistoric creatures that still exist
Posted 5-21-2016 | 1 comment
A look at some remarkable animal species that have survived for millions of years.
 
Why do we have 10 fingers and 10 toes ?
Posted 5-20-2016 | 2 comments
What is the reason that we happen to have exactly 10 fingers and toes ? Why that number ?
 
Talking tapes
Posted 5-19-2016 | 1 comment
Tim demonstrates a unique form of audio recording which uses ridged strips of plastic.
 
Building a popcorn machine
Posted 5-18-2016 | 1 comment
Adam Savage and Simone Giertz build a novel hands-free device for eating popcorn.
 
 View: More videos
Stories & Experiences
Not in our jurisdiction
5-2-2016 | California, United States
 
Zippers and headlights
5-2-2016 | Raleigh, United States
 
Spinning, voiceless and breathless
5-2-2016 | Garland, Texas
 
Paralyzed
4-15-2016 | United States
 
The mysterious awakening
4-6-2016 | Los Angeles, California
 
Chocolate fairy? Really?
4-6-2016 | United Kingdom
 
Christmas Day haunting
4-6-2016 | London, UK
 
The funeral director
3-30-2016 | Hebburn, England
 
A strange sighting in Spain
3-30-2016 | Albatera, Spain
 
Dust patterns on basement floor
3-27-2016 | Smithville, Texas
 

         More stories | Send us your story
 
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.7 Unexplained-Mysteries.com © 2001-2015
Privacy Policy and Disclaimer   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ