Turin Shroud to go on display

I personally view this as Christian propaganda. The shroud has had huge debate as to its authenticity, and pretty much (although not totally) been proven as a fake. Avid Christians will typically never even read the research done into the authenticity of it, though. Money making and propaganda, in my opinion.

Money making and propaganda, in my opinion. Pretty well all religion is about that...

The Shroud was originally presented by a Bishop, who would ring a bell, while announcing it was a fake. The Church viewed it as a fake, but the people believed in it anyway, and the Church is capitalizing on it.

Its a fake and the whole theory where it was devinci and he was taking the first photograph in history seems to be the best explanation ive heard so far

I personally view this as Christian propaganda. The shroud has had huge debate as to its authenticity, and pretty much (although not totally) been proven as a fake. Avid Christians will typically never even read the research done into the authenticity of it, though. Money making and propaganda, in my opinion. In mid-1970s Vatican purposely invited a large group of experts from USSR scientific institutions to take part in the research of the shroud, and apart of their statement that the blood spots were later fakes, possibly renewed from time to time, they confirmed the consistency of the shrou... [More]