Monday, May 6, 2024
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries
You are viewing: Home > Columns > Stephen King > Column article
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
Stephen King

Rise in global cancer rates

November 12, 2010 | Comment icon 21 comments
Image Credit: sxc.hu
A recent article from Self magazine about cancer concerns answered questions from their readers about the increase in concern of rising cancer rates and if these concerns were legit. According to the article Michael Thun, M.D., an epidemiologist at the American Cancer Society in Atlanta, reported no increase in cancers but a decrease in incidents and deaths.

After looking at the cancer rate statistics from 2009-2010 shown on the American Cancer Society website, the numbers seem to show a different story. When answering the question, “How many people are expected to die of cancer this year?”, the 2009-2010 reports show an increase from 562,340 to 569,490.

Also when you look specifically at the types of cancer Dr. Thun assured Self Magazine were on the decline, the numbers also show an increase from 2009-2010. Breast cancer rates show 194,280 in 2009 and in 2010 the new cases show a rise to 209,060. Brain, eye, ovarian, and uterine also show an increase in new cases. The stats mentioned above are the amount of “new cases” that doctors are seeing, where as the statistics reported by Dr. Thun are only talking about the cases of death related incidences of a few types of cancer.

This article is not directed as an attack on Dr. Thun but on the overall perception given by organizations and governments who either are not willing to look up the information that is being recorded in their own statistical sheets or to minimize the rising fears and concerns.

The cancers that affect children and the elderly should be of the most concern to the medical community as both of these age ranges have an increased amount of difficulty fighting back against cancer and surviving the horrendous treatments that are mostly still used by almost every major hospital or medical establishment. Of note, Leukemia does show new cases on the decline slightly so we will want to keep an eye on this statistic to see if these numbers continue to drop.

The only mentioned cancer that actually showed a decrease of new cases was colon cancer which seems to be related to the improvements in early detection. Deaths from cancers do seem to be on the decline overall due to better treatments but the new cases of these cancers are not overall declining. From the average American’s point of view though, we would like to also know why there is an increase in almost every single type of cancer that is recorded.

Most epidemiologists, and many other doctors in the field, are coming out to the public forefront and speaking about why they believe cancers are on the rise globally. To learn more about cancer, electromagnetic frequencies, and reasons why there could be an increased risk in your or your loved ones life from cancer please visit http://www.emfscience.com.[!gad]A recent article from Self magazine about cancer concerns answered questions from their readers about the increase in concern of rising cancer rates and if these concerns were legit. According to the article Michael Thun, M.D., an epidemiologist at the American Cancer Society in Atlanta, reported no increase in cancers but a decrease in incidents and deaths.

After looking at the cancer rate statistics from 2009-2010 shown on the American Cancer Society website, the numbers seem to show a different story. When answering the question, “How many people are expected to die of cancer this year?”, the 2009-2010 reports show an increase from 562,340 to 569,490.

Also when you look specifically at the types of cancer Dr. Thun assured Self Magazine were on the decline, the numbers also show an increase from 2009-2010. Breast cancer rates show 194,280 in 2009 and in 2010 the new cases show a rise to 209,060. Brain, eye, ovarian, and uterine also show an increase in new cases. The stats mentioned above are the amount of “new cases” that doctors are seeing, where as the statistics reported by Dr. Thun are only talking about the cases of death related incidences of a few types of cancer.

This article is not directed as an attack on Dr. Thun but on the overall perception given by organizations and governments who either are not willing to look up the information that is being recorded in their own statistical sheets or to minimize the rising fears and concerns.

The cancers that affect children and the elderly should be of the most concern to the medical community as both of these age ranges have an increased amount of difficulty fighting back against cancer and surviving the horrendous treatments that are mostly still used by almost every major hospital or medical establishment. Of note, Leukemia does show new cases on the decline slightly so we will want to keep an eye on this statistic to see if these numbers continue to drop.

The only mentioned cancer that actually showed a decrease of new cases was colon cancer which seems to be related to the improvements in early detection. Deaths from cancers do seem to be on the decline overall due to better treatments but the new cases of these cancers are not overall declining. From the average American’s point of view though, we would like to also know why there is an increase in almost every single type of cancer that is recorded.

Most epidemiologists, and many other doctors in the field, are coming out to the public forefront and speaking about why they believe cancers are on the rise globally. To learn more about cancer, electromagnetic frequencies, and reasons why there could be an increased risk in your or your loved ones life from cancer please visit http://www.emfscience.com. Comments (21)


<< Previous story
The wonder of writing
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #12 Posted by Hatch 14 years ago
Hatch, you REALLY need to learn the difference between an anecdote and data. Data is PLURAL and is derived from many, MANY anecdotes. Okay, so Grandma lived to 92 and smoked and drank, I counter that with a 2-year old born of two fitness and health gurus - that developed cancer and died. BOTH are merely anecdotes and should be discounted - OR viewed in context with the wider view of ALL the data available. It wasn't that many generations ago that people just "died" and the only thing people knew that it was either sudden or lingering - but it was almost always listed as "natural causes". My ow... [More]
Comment icon #13 Posted by Non sequitur 14 years ago
I see your point... I still won't put anything in my mouth I can't pronounce though! Imitation butter and non dairy creamers can't be good for a person! I think the more they fancy up the everyday stuff the more they gum up the works. Much like the new light bulbs we are supposed to go to, you practically need a haz mat team to dispose of the darn things and they give me a rash!! Nope, I don't have lupus, just really sensitive skin. so i can pronounce a big mac..thats not healthy.i cant pronounce many chinese or indian meals but im sure their alot healthier than what i shove down my throat...j... [More]
Comment icon #14 Posted by Hatch 14 years ago
so i can pronounce a big mac..thats not healthy.i cant pronounce many chinese or indian meals but im sure their alot healthier than what i shove down my throat...just a shame i cant pronounce it otherwise id eat it Funny!! Ah, but can you pronounce all the ingredients in the big mac??? And what about that cheese??? Where did it come from, a cow??? If you were chinese or indian, I bet you could pronounce the ingredients!! Eat well, that's all I'm saying and pay more attention to what goes in your mouth than what is politically correct. Common sense, it's a new old concept.
Comment icon #15 Posted by :PsYKoTiC:BeHAvIoR: 14 years ago
Funny!! Ah, but can you pronounce all the ingredients in the big mac??? And what about that cheese??? Where did it come from, a cow??? If you were chinese or indian, I bet you could pronounce the ingredients!! Eat well, that's all I'm saying and pay more attention to what goes in your mouth than what is politically correct. Common sense, it's a new old concept. Haha, while I do agree a healthy diet with natural ingredients is certainly recommended to maintain a strong immune system and a strong body, it's not the only contributing factor for cancer. I had cancer at the age of 19. Lymphoma, Non... [More]
Comment icon #16 Posted by Travelling Man 14 years ago
Funny!! Ah, but can you pronounce all the ingredients in the big mac??? And what about that cheese??? Where did it come from, a cow??? If you were chinese or indian, I bet you could pronounce the ingredients!! Eat well, that's all I'm saying and pay more attention to what goes in your mouth than what is politically correct. Common sense, it's a new old concept. Well, as for the meat, it's 100% beef (in Western Countries, anyway), and is 70% lean. There are 10 patties to a pound. The only thing they add to the meat is cold... the patties are flash-frozen after patty-izing them. After cooking, t... [More]
Comment icon #17 Posted by 3rd rock resident alien 14 years ago
Grow your own food under the Sun. Put plants inside your home to supply you with unpolluted oxygen. Go green. 100 year lifespan.
Comment icon #18 Posted by Travelling Man 14 years ago
So, Resident Alien, do you live on at LEAST 11 acres of land that can be farmed? If not, your family of four will starve to death. Oh, and what about those pesky things like fertilizer (oh, you want to have cattle as well? Then add to your acreage!!), and pesticides and stuff like that. Oh - and pick your favorite children for that first year of some flavor of blight - because not all of you will live. Let's actually do something strange here and actually spend some time in REALITY.
Comment icon #19 Posted by 3rd rock resident alien 14 years ago
All humans has a small canine teeth. It's a plant eater. Put the garden inside your home. If you know how to plant all those plant disease can be prevented. Download research files on all plants and your good in your own bio sustaining house. All people dies. 100 year lifetime plus/minus 30 years, depends on your lifestyle. Add the cancer machines roving around and installed on public places, you will see a rise of cancer cases. That machines will rearrange your DNA. One mutation will do you in five years.
Comment icon #20 Posted by Gummug 14 years ago
Life style, they worked harder and longer years ago, to many slack jawed slackers today.
Comment icon #21 Posted by Gummug 14 years ago
So, Resident Alien, do you live on at LEAST 11 acres of land that can be farmed? If not, your family of four will starve to death. Oh, and what about those pesky things like fertilizer (oh, you want to have cattle as well? Then add to your acreage!!), and pesticides and stuff like that. Oh - and pick your favorite children for that first year of some flavor of blight - because not all of you will live. Let's actually do something strange here and actually spend some time in REALITY. I could be wrong, and I apologize in advance if I am, but I don't think he meant that as a sole source of food, ... [More]


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


 Total Posts: 7,611,162    Topics: 316,648    Members: 201,906

 Not a member yet ? Click here to join - registration is free and only takes a moment!
Recent news and articles