Wednesday, April 30, 2025
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries Support Us
You are viewing: Home > News > Space & Astronomy > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All ▾
Search Submit

Space & Astronomy

Russia set to ban US from using space station

By T.K. Randall
May 14, 2014 · Comment icon 38 comments

American astronauts could soon be barred from accessing the station. Image Credit: NASA
The US will no longer have access to the station after 2020 as Russia responds to Ukraine sanctions.
The $150 billion space station has been synonymous with international co-operation since its construction began back in 1998, but now due to Russia's response to sanctions imposed by the United States over the Ukraine crisis it looks as though the project could come to a rather bitter end.

Dmitry Rogozin, Russia's deputy Prime Minister, has this week announced a series of punitive measures including the banning of American astronauts from accessing the station after 2020 and putting an end to US military satellites being launched on Russian rockets.
"These sanctions are out of place and inappropriate," he said. "We have enough of our own problems."

The US currently relies heavily on Russia for its operations aboard the station, both because it requires use of the Soyuz spacecraft to get astronauts up in to space and because the American segment of the station cannot operate without the Russian segment, even though the Russian segment can exist independently of its American counterpart.

It is possible that the two countries will reconcile their differences before 2020 and that the International Space Station program will continue, but right now things aren't looking too promising.

Source: Telegraph | Comments (38)




Other news and articles
Our latest videos Visit us on YouTube
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #29 Posted by Frank Merton 11 years ago
It may be the West was a little to eager and premature in wanting to get Russia involved with the west in space cooperation, and the Russians pulled a fast one thereby getting an advantage. The government in Russia as it now stands is not a democracy (the center has too much power to be arbitrary) nor is it an ideologically legitimate Communist entity. It is just a klepocracy.
Comment icon #30 Posted by DONTEATUS 11 years ago
Im almost 100% sure that NASA has had and will always be thinking quite a bit ahead of the curve ! Its Not Like them to be in a Hurry up and catch up mode ! Not in there vocabulary ! I hope ?
Comment icon #31 Posted by Frank Merton 11 years ago
I don't know that it much matters at this stage what the US does. Plenty of people are launching rockets, including private firms, so the progress in space will go on.
Comment icon #32 Posted by DONTEATUS 11 years ago
Elon Musk must have a Full Plate now ? I bet He`s Dreaming up a New Idea on how to do it !
Comment icon #33 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf 11 years ago
That is not what the article is saying: the article states 2 options; pull the funding for the ISS in 2020 or; Russia will have exclusive use of the ISS after 2020 and not allow USA astronauts access via the Soyuz programme. In that case, with all due respect to the article, the part about the Soyuz is factually wrong. Roscosmos has a contract with NASA for Soyuz launches until only 2017. (see here: Russia to Launch 6 More NASA Astronauts). After that NASA hopes to have independent access to the ISS via the Commercial Crew Program using either the Boeing CST-100, the SpaceX Dragon or the Sierr... [More]
Comment icon #34 Posted by DONTEATUS 11 years ago
Any bets on that facts about the ISS ? Fact the USA will not ever give up out presence in Space on the ISS. Fact THe Russians actually are just trying to Flex there Launch capibilities and the USA`s need for said Launch`s Anyone care to Say whats really going to Happen to the ISS ? Give it your best Shot !
Comment icon #35 Posted by MyOtherAccount 11 years ago
Perhaps we should sue them for breach of contract in the international courts?
Comment icon #36 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf 11 years ago
Perhaps we should sue them for breach of contract in the international courts? They have not breached any contracts. All the Russians have done is refuse to agree an extension to the life of the space station beyond the already agreed limit of 2020. They are continuing to provide Soyuz flights until 2017 as they are contracted to do. They are continuing to keep their side of the station operational until 2020 as they are contracted to do.
Comment icon #37 Posted by Finity 11 years ago
There will be an alternative to Soyuz by then. Soyuz is pretty old technology already, like most of Russia's stuff. It was only ever meant as a temporary measure after they retired the shuttles (which are still far more advanced than Soyuz even now, they should have kept them).
Comment icon #38 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf 11 years ago
they should have kept them. Why, wasn't 2 destroyed vehicles and 14 dead astronauts enough? The Soyuz may be based on old technology but so was the shuttle (designed in the 1970s). The Soyuz has evolved. The current TMA-M series is the fifth generation. The Soyuz has three bid advantages over the shuttle as a ferry vehicle to the ISS: It is much cheaper It can remain attached to the ISS for more than 6 months compared with the shuttle's two weeks It is much, MUCH safer


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Recent news and articles