Friday, January 27, 2023
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
You are viewing: Home > News > Palaeontology > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
Palaeontology

Dinosaurs 'in decline' before asteroid strike

By T.K. Randall
April 19, 2016 · Comment icon 21 comments



What ultimately wiped out the dinosaurs ? Image Credit: CC BY-SA 2.5 Gerhard Boeggemann
A new study has suggested that the dinosaurs had already been dying out long before the asteroid hit.
The impact, which occurred 66 million years ago, has long been attributed with the extinction of the dinosaurs, yet there is strong evidence to suggest that these prosperous reptiles may have already been on the decline and that the apocalyptic asteroid strike had simply tipped them over the edge.

By conducting a statistical analysis of fossils from three of the largest dinosaur family trees, a team of scientists led by palaeontologist Manabu Sakamoto of Reading University have determined that the dinosaurs may have even been on their way out for tens of millions of years beforehand.
"While the asteroid impact is still the prime candidate for the dinosaurs’ final disappearance, it is clear that they were already past their prime in an evolutionary sense," said Dr Sakamoto.

"While a sudden apocalypse may have been the final nail in the coffin, something else had already been preventing dinosaurs from evolving new species as fast as old species were dying out."

This gradual decline, coupled with the devastating effects of the asteroid strike, would have left plenty of room for mammals to flourish both before and after the dinosaurs went extinct.



Source: Independent | Comments (21)


Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #12 Posted by BeastieRunner 7 years ago
New Study, I always thought this theory had been floating around for a couple of years. The study looks like just a duplication of what Robert Bakker published in the early 1980's - outlined for us regular folks in his book "The Dinosaur Heresies" in 1986 link. Bakker blamed disease primarily, IIRC. His study showed dramatic drops in the variations among different members of the same genus. The disappearance of large numbers of species indicates problems, even if those species had their niches filled by other members of their genus. Fewer kinds of stegosaurs or ceratopsians, for example, in ot... [More]
Comment icon #13 Posted by A rather obscure Bassoon 7 years ago
But dinosaurs didn't go extinct. You can see them everywhere today as birds which evolved from feathered dinosaurs. I'll remember that next time I see a T-rex land in my backyard.
Comment icon #14 Posted by Why not 7 years ago
I'm sorry but there is no possible way that scales evolved into feathers. Research the structure of a feather and the scales from lizards and dinosaur fossils. I don't see how that claim can be made of scales to feathers. There has to be another reason for feathers.
Comment icon #15 Posted by Harte 7 years ago
I'm sorry but there is no possible way that scales evolved into feathers. Research the structure of a feather and the scales from lizards and dinosaur fossils. I don't see how that claim can be made of scales to feathers. There has to be another reason for feathers. You appear not to know of the multiple feathered dinosaur finds. Turn out a lot of different kinds had feathers of some sort. Harte
Comment icon #16 Posted by Harte 7 years ago
So this is a "plebeian" version of Bakker's theory from long ago? Don't know. I'll let you know when I read this guy's book, if he writes one. But AFAIK Bakker was the first to show that there was a decline well before the K-T event. I'd guess other Paleontologists have shown things along similar lines in the 30 years since Bakker's book. I saw the paperback was 97 cents. It's a damn good dinosaur book. Harte
Comment icon #17 Posted by PersonFromPorlock 7 years ago
The article isn't clear, but a decline in species without a decline in populations might simply indicate that the remaining species were optimally adapted to their environment. Competing species, being less able to exploit the available resources, perished. After 160 million years of evolving, maybe dinosaurs were asymptotically approaching perfection.
Comment icon #18 Posted by shadowsot 7 years ago
Over specialization is an old idea for their extinction. It certainly isn't a bad one, as the possibility for a homogenous population being unable to adapt quickly to changes in environment from competition or climate or changing ecosystems is a real possibility. Grasslands started to appear around the same time that sauropods started to diminish, for example.
Comment icon #19 Posted by Hartmut 7 years ago
Makes sense, given their lumbering size, although some did manage to evolve into more 'doable size' birds. And other reptiles like the crocodile survived the comet too. :-)
Comment icon #20 Posted by freetoroam 7 years ago
I read about this and thought..how long? The dinosaurs were already in decline 50 million years before the asteroid strike that finally wiped them out, a study suggests. http://www.bbc.co.uk...onment-36073592 50 millions years? that's some slow decline. Where does that leave us, I can not even contemplate humans being here for that long, let along declining over that period of time.
Comment icon #21 Posted by Skulduggery 7 years ago
Well, dinosaurs had claws. Simple explanation.


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

 Total Posts: 7,394,053    Topics: 304,239    Members: 199,401

 Not a member yet ? Click here to join - registration is free and only takes a moment!
Recent news and articles