Thursday, May 1, 2025
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries Support Us
You are viewing: Home > News > The UFO Phenomenon > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All ▾
Search Submit

The UFO Phenomenon

AATIP has sparked a renewed interest in UFOs

By T.K. Randall
March 5, 2018 · Comment icon 45 comments

The program has helped to validate UFOs as a legitimate topic of study. Image Credit: US Army
The US government's recent foray in to UFO research has helped to reignite interest in the phenomenon.
Known as the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP), the top secret initiative, which aimed to investigate credible reports of UFOs, ran from 2007 to 2012.

The revelation was unexpected, especially given that the last official government investigation in to the UFO phenomenon - Project Blue Book - ended over 50 years ago.

While it remains unclear what, if anything, AATIP found during its investigations, the news of its existence has since led to something of a resurgence of interest in UFOs and UFO research.

"The researchers in this area have always speculated and wondered what is going on behind the scenes," said investigative journalist and author Leslie Kean.
"Is there a government investigation into this? And now we know that the answer is yes."

"It just establishes a credibility for the topic for people to know that our government takes it seriously enough to have put financial resources into it and to have studied it for all these years."

Kean also hopes that the reveal will help reduce the stigma of conducting research in to UFOs.

"Professional people feel like they're going to be laughed at, and it's the same problem for scientists and academic institutions and universities and research facilities who want to work on this topic, but they feel that it would be detrimental to their careers," she said.

Source: wtop.com | Comments (45)




Other news and articles
Our latest videos Visit us on YouTube
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #36 Posted by psyche101 7 years ago
She's a journalist. No scientific background. Her forte is exaggeration.  She doesn't investigate the phenomena, she seeks out tall tales, writes books about them and attacks real scientists to create controversy, she's just another rubbish UFOlogist.  She is just making things up again. Think about it, scientists already are very familiar with scientific method and how to prove something. If they have evidence they know the best way to present it. The myth that they fear reprisal just doesn't make sense. The only ones who are not coming forward are zealous claimants who know they can't fill... [More]
Comment icon #37 Posted by ChrLzs 7 years ago
This sentence speaks volumes, Fila.  Think about why you said it.......  "Appalling"?  Why? First up, there is plenty of evidence for UFOs, when you use the correct definition.  Lots of stuff never gets positively identified - that's the nature of bad recordings of distant lights in the sky, often taken by inexperienced observers... None of that 'data' shows anything conclusively non-terrestrial.  So even if we change the definition of UFO to one that you like.... ..  if there is no evidence (as you seem to concede) of 'it', be 'it' aliens/interdimensionals/insertwhatever.... why ... [More]
Comment icon #38 Posted by Hawkin 7 years ago
It would seem there's money to be made on both sides. Michael Shermer (Skeptic Magazine) Net Worth. https://networthpost.com/net-worth/michael-shermer-net-worth/ 
Comment icon #39 Posted by Dejarma 7 years ago
yep, everyone's happy- oh joy
Comment icon #40 Posted by Fila 7 years ago
Hi ChrLzs. I am using the term UFOs to refer to cases that are yet to be positively identified. We are discussing the correct use here and would appreciate any input you have. (https://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/forum/topic/314101-redefining-the-term-ufo/) I think the lack of evidence is due to the event still being in the "observation" stage. Until 1980 with Hessdallen's scientific observatory.., the Airforce and Universities have relied on witness testimonies and reports. Kinda lame and weak imo. https://www.physics.smu.edu/pseudo/UFOs/dod174.pdf  I don't want to change it to one that ... [More]
Comment icon #41 Posted by stereologist 7 years ago
The call for better research or different into UFOs reminds me of astrology. When something like astrology is shown to be wrong there is the refrain, "You didn't do it right." Here we have the suggestion that " There is no scientific evidence due to a lack of proper scientific inquiry. " Is that correct? I think this is just another effort to apply the old astrology logic to research into UFOs. Unlike astrology the idea is that the data collection is wrong rather than the experiment set up by the researcher being wrong. What is readily apparent is that even when simple ideas such as the groun... [More]
Comment icon #42 Posted by Fila 7 years ago
Yes. If people keep saying they have seen something.., then I guess that is means to look into it. Not ignore it. Especially if these people are so adamant they've seen something. Don't worry about money. It wouldn't be government funded by tax. Probs end up being a university thesis or private company / GoFundMe type thingy. I'm all for it hey. Screw the old ways of saying no. Let's have a go hey?
Comment icon #43 Posted by Fila 7 years ago
I know everyone is sick of hearing it.., but something like the Hessdalen observation station. http://www.hessdalen.org http://www.hessdalen.org
Comment icon #44 Posted by stereologist 7 years ago
None of this addresses my statement.
Comment icon #45 Posted by Fila 7 years ago
Okay, I see your point. I just meant.., "give it a go." because the data we do currently have is insufficient, due to a lack of proper scientific study for what the phenomenon alleges.., and in all rights could potentially be (based on logic, physics, and the fact that humans always assume we know everything about the universe, life and time before time was even a thing.) It would not be applying astrology or pseudo-science to UFOs and other unknown things. The exact opposite. More science should be applied was my vague point.


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Recent news and articles