Friday, July 12, 2024
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries
You are viewing: Home > News > Conspiracy > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All ▾
Search Submit


Why are conspiracies thriving in the pandemic?

January 31, 2021 · Comment icon 12 comments

Conspiracy theories have complicated the process of informing the public. Image Credit: CDC
The coronavirus pandemic has seen the proliferation of several - often damaging - conspiracy theories.
Rod Dacombe - Director of the Center for British Politics and Government at King's College London - explores why the current situation has produced such an uptick in conspiratorial thinking.

We've all seen them. Those posts shared by friends of friends on Facebook, that jaw-dropping tweet you can scarcely believe was not immediately deleted. Alongside social distancing and Zoom meetings, it seems that one inescapable symptom of the pandemic is the proliferation of conspiracy theories on social media.

Conspiracy theories are distinct from other forms of misinformation and falsehood. They are particular ways in which we make sense of the complex and sometimes disturbing world around us. They have also long been seen as a particularly political phenomenon. The American historian Richard Hofstadter famously referred to such ideas as underpinning a "paranoid style" of political thinking, replete with "heated exaggeration, suspiciousness, and conspiratorial fantasy".

A more recent understanding of their importance can be found in the work of the political theorist Alfred Moore, who suggests they are means of "explaining events or phenomena in a way that is unwarranted, implausible, or even dangerous, invoking ever and deeper conspiracies and discounting all contradictory evidence".

In my work, I argue that over recent years we have seen the emergence of distinct forms of conspiracy theory, driven by structural changes in the way we communicate about politics. In order to understand the phenomenon, we need to think of conspiracy theories as part of a significant shift in the ways political participation happens in contemporary democracies.

Filling a void

There are a number of reasons why we are seeing conspiracy theories take hold in this way, and these have implications for our response to the pandemic which cannot be ignored.

It is well established that conspiracy theories are more prevalent in times of crisis. Research shows us that the popularity of these ideas is not constant, and peaks during cataclysmic events and social upheaval. Conspiracy theories were prominent during previous pandemics, including the Black Death, the "Russian flu" of the late 19th century and the 1918 flu pandemic.

However, in contrast to past crises, recent conspiracy theories have been driven by the rapid change in how we communicate with each other. Of particular importance is the emergence of social media sites, which enable the rapid spread of information based on (superficially, at least) plausible information produced by what appear to be reliable sources. This context matters, in part because it allows a great degree of individual agency in the dissemination of conspiracy theories.

Fundamentally, conspiracy theories of this kind are powerful because they are participatory. They engage people directly in the development and amplification of political ideas, however outlandish they might seem. In an environment when trust and confidence in political institutions are declining and engagement in democracy is highly unequal, this form of participation provides an easily-accessible and engaging alternative to mainstream forms of political participation.
There is an adage amongst online conspiracy theorists - do your own research. This encourages those involved to seek out validation of their ideas from sources which refute the "official" narrative. Engaging in contemporary conspiracy theories therefore has a game-like quality. People are encouraged to "discover" information promoted through their online networks rather than passively accept data and facts produced by established sources. Research tells us that any evidence presented to the contrary, no matter how compelling, is unlikely to be accepted, and indeed, might even be taken as evidence in favour of the conspiracy theory. More importantly, following these beliefs necessarily means adopting a distrustful orientation towards public institutions and scientific evidence.

Facing facts

There is clear potential for conspiracy theories of this kind to undermine efforts to stop the spread of COVID and damage trust in vaccines. False arguments against vaccines are presented as an "alternative narrative" of equal status to scientific evidence. Attempts to expose the frailties of such a position are held to be evidence of vested interests on the part of state agencies and pharmaceutical companies.

Throughout, the participatory, gamified nature of the generation and spread of these ideas allows people to find a degree of stability in a confusing and unsettling time. Surely, part of the appeal that there is a "plandemic" is that there is, actually, a plan governing our lives rather than uncertainty at every turn.

The dangers of such conspiracy theories for public health and our ability to navigate a path away from the current pandemic are real. In such an environment, it can be hard to know fact from fiction, with expertise and established sources of information refuted and rejected through social media. That we have not seen a coherent and credible response to this issue is therefore deeply worrying.

Numerous steps might be taken to address the problem. Rethinking the regulation of social media and removing the most prolific "super-spreader" social media accounts (including those of celebrities and public figures) has obvious potential. A senior figure in government might also be appointed to lead on addressing misinformation. However, any intervention needs to be rooted in an understanding of the shifting context of political participation.

Of course, there are difficult questions over how we ensure that we address these forms of conspiracy theory in a way that doesn't restrict the legitimate questioning of authority that is essential in any democracy. But it is imperative that as a society we recognise, and respond to, the sudden growth in conspiracy theories of this kind.

Rod Dacombe, Director of the Center for British Politics and Government, King's College London

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license.

Read the original article. The Conversation

Source: The Conversation | Comments (12)

Other news and articles
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #3 Posted by XenoFish 3 years ago
They thrive because a lot of people have lost trust in the media.
Comment icon #4 Posted by OpenMindedSceptic 3 years ago
They possibly thrive due to the dialogue used to develop induced fear which leads to many saying, this sounds like BS.  Then their experts and faceless scientists get their projections wrong by factors of 12 to 15.  They take a course of action never seen before and use the populations in some sort of social experiment called lockdowns. They throw out a lifeline vaccine in an unheard timescale where the mantra previously was, it takes time to get this stuff to market. One politician pumped money offshore via his buddy's business and influenced the use of the same small company he pumped mon... [More]
Comment icon #5 Posted by stereologist 3 years ago
Can you provide an example of any these stories of yours? Then their experts and faceless scientists get their projections wrong by factors of 12 to 15.  What nameless experts? The experts are known. factors of 12 to 15? Please tell us what you are on about and please post links to support your tale. They take a course of action never seen before and use the populations in some sort of social experiment called lockdowns. Lock downs are well known for pandemics. They have been used for centuries. Ships were turned away during pandemics as ports were locked down. China and New Zealand have stop... [More]
Comment icon #6 Posted by stereologist 3 years ago
I think the problem is complicated. The internet gives all sorts of cranks a voice and the copy and paste of viral disinformation makes some think that it must be legitimate. There has been a steady drop in the belief in science since the 80s. People have the bizarre idea that their opinion is somehow a fact. Trolls online love to push garbage stories. There are all sorts of pretend news outlets that support political motives through fake stories. The latter item was common with Trump in the US making up some bizarre claim and then these pretend news outlets generated the fake stories supporti... [More]
Comment icon #7 Posted by Hawken 3 years ago
And politicians "Never waste a good crisis" -Hillary Clinton
Comment icon #8 Posted by Grey Area 3 years ago
I had this discussion with a Psychologist colleague of mine a couple of months back and she had a really interesting insight into conspiracy theories, one which I think I subscribe to. It goes like this.  Fear drives conspiracy theories, much of the time quite unconsciously, fear of the reality of the world, the reality being that despite governments and a thin layering of order, total chaos is only a heartbeat away, governments and law are completely fallible.  Conspiracy arises to apply and extra layer of perceived order in an otherwise very vulnerable society. There you go, and I can tota... [More]
Comment icon #9 Posted by Tom1200 3 years ago
A sad and regrettable truth. All media are biased.  Every editor has to decide what to include/exclude from publication/broadcast.  Editors are human, with opinions of their own, or answerable to influential agents - owners, sponsors, advertisers, politicians, etc.  We naturally migrate to certain media, to read/hear/see articulate people promote ideas we share.  We all accept this is part of a free society - the freedom to hold differing views on matters big or small.  When we buy a newspaper we know where it will stand on most contentious issues. But we hold certain media to higher sta... [More]
Comment icon #10 Posted by Tatetopa 3 years ago
Yep. Buyer beware.  We forget why the media is in business and think it is to inform us.  Their goal is to capture our attention and sell advertising, doesn't matter which market niche they pander too.    Good.  Best to be aware and check sources, I hope you do question and consider and challenge.  If enough people do that, it might save us.
Comment icon #11 Posted by OpenMindedSceptic 3 years ago
Stereo, you've been warned already by the admin here. Move along. If you want to know which politician pumped money into a company linked with coronavirus before it was a thing then YOU need to do your own homework. The company is registered in Bermuda. YOU need to do your own research now.
Comment icon #12 Posted by Saru 3 years ago
Front page story thread closed to further comments.

Please Login or Register to post a comment.

Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News


Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon


For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Top 10 trending mysteries
Recent news and articles