Thursday, November 30, 2023
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries
You are viewing: Home > News > The UFO Phenomenon > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All ▾
Search Submit

The UFO Phenomenon

How NASA plans to get to the bottom of the UFO phenomenon

September 25, 2023 · Comment icon 35 comments

NASA's UFO hearing which took place in January. Image Credit: NASA
Cosmologist Christopher Pattison takes a look at NASA's plans for the future of UFO research.
As reports continue flying in about what were traditionally called UFOs (unidentified flying objects), Nasa is taking the topic very seriously. In fact, following the publication of a report from an independent committee of experts in fields including astronomy and aviation safety, the agency has even appointed a new director of unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP) research.

UAP is the term Nasa now uses for UFOs. The committee was directed to gather reports of UAPs and try to understand what these mysterious events really are, including answering the question of whether or not they could be extraterrestrial in origin.

The committee held a press conference back in May, when it provided an update on its work up to that point. The study team outlined some of the common explanations for UAP sightings - which includes boats low on the horizon and high-flying balloons - as well as how many events remained truly unexplained.

Now, the committee has published the full report into what it has found, including recommendations for Nasa as its work continues. That report, which also contains Nasa's response and plan as it moves forward, can be read in full here. I've also created a video about the findings.

The report makes clear that, so far, the committee has absolutely no evidence that any of the reported UAP events have any involvement from aliens. But for the reports that are still unexplained by terrestrial phenomena or aircraft, the team doesn't rule anything out. It makes it clear that an extraterrestrial origin is unlikely, but that it has no evidence at all for what these sightings are.

The rest of the report deals with how Nasa should respond to the findings, and what it plans to do to continue this research in future.

Need for transparency

The most substantial response has been the appointment of the director of UAP research - a brand new role. Initially, when announcing this, Nasa refused to name the person in the role. It hoped to shield the new UAP director from the kind of harassment that some members of the committee have received for their involvement in the research.

However, the space agency also pledged to be completely transparent about the work on UAPs and everything it finds. This philosophy seems to have prevailed, and Nasa later announced that the new director would be Mark McInerney, a previous Nasa liaison to the US Department of Defense.
Nasa also put forward the idea of developing a smartphone app to aid with the future reporting of UAPs. While there are hundreds of sightings available for study by the committee, one persistent problem it has faced is poor data and images.

Nasa hopes to combat this issue for future reports by using the billions of high-tech detectors around the world that most people carry everywhere. Smartphones can collect a lot of high quality information, starting with photos and videos, but they can also gather data on gravity, magnetic fields, locations and more. If the general public were open to the idea, Nasa would like to one day allow people to report sightings directly from their phones to the agency.

Another interesting revelation in the report is the prominence that Nasa believes artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning could have as this work continues. Looking for patterns in the UAP reports - such as geographical reporting hotspots - could hold the key to finally understanding the causes of some of the events that remain mysterious.

Pattern spotting is something that humans are very good at, but sometimes the common thread is so subtle and unexpected that people can't spot it. Luckily, AI is getting better and more powerful, and pattern spotting is one of the things it excels at. This raises the interesting possibility that AI could be essential in one day identifying the first evidence for extraterrestrial life visiting Earth. It's not likely that we'll identify aliens, but Nasa isn't ruling it out.

The week that this report was released turned out to be a busy week for discussions about aliens. In Mexico, a journalist named Jaime Maussan presented alleged "mummified aliens" to the country's Congress that he claimed had been found in Peru.

He said the specimens contained non-human DNA, but this has not yet been independently verified. In fact, much doubt has been cast over the authenticity of these corpses.

In both cases, the world must wait longer to get more concrete evidence. As more reports are collected by Nasa, it might be possible to get more clarity on what these strange objects are. And if independent testing of the Mexico specimens takes place, there might be a conclusion to this claim too.

Christopher Pattison, Researcher at the Institute of Cosmology and Gravitation, University of Portsmouth

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license.

Read the original article. The Conversation

Source: The Conversation | Comments (35)

Other news and articles
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #26 Posted by Earl.Of.Trumps 3 months ago
Nothing.  There was something M 7 said that this link tied right into, and that is what I was addressing.
Comment icon #27 Posted by Dejarma 3 months ago
fair enough 
Comment icon #28 Posted by Robotic Jew 2 months ago
George Soros of course.
Comment icon #29 Posted by Phantom309 2 months ago
The reality of dear old NASA and their style of "investigation".......  
Comment icon #30 Posted by Trelane 2 months ago
True believers will never be satisfied. Even if the truth came up and sat right on their faces they would deny it. They will cherry pick items from scientists that propose or theorize items that align with their beliefs. Then will categorically ignore or try to deny what other and usually more credible scientists provide to the contrary.  Funny, but sad. 
Comment icon #31 Posted by Cho Jinn 2 months ago
Surely, and those things of course have lead to and do lead to "sightings" or claims.  To your point, I fondly recall, driving north on M-53 in Sterling Heights, Michigan in an afternoon of 2004 or so when a B-2 came in very low, and very quietly, over the freeway area presumably en route to touching down at Selfridge AFB.  Working in the defense sector, and being a fan generally, my reaction was "awesome!"  The slamming of brakes and dangerously evasive maneuvers on the highway revealed that others were not so familiar with the aircraft, which looked just huge and ominous.  It was flying,... [More]
Comment icon #32 Posted by Imran S 2 months ago
Most likely they are “jinn”
Comment icon #33 Posted by Trelane 2 months ago
Interesting points Cho, thanks for your insight. I have also been in the defense sector for over 25 years (military police and intelligence). The claims of some can only be taken at face value as just hat, stories. The problem with many of them is corroborating evidence that can be verified. In way to many instances  there are these incredible claims but nothing at all to validate it beyond the statements.  The problem with the "phenomenon" is that people are alleging these wild speeds and capabilities with nothing presented to corroborate it. That is problematic especially reports coming fr... [More]
Comment icon #34 Posted by Cho Jinn 2 months ago
I didn't mean to imply anything was surreptitious, and I could have used a better word than "leaked."  Perhaps just "transferred." More data on the subject would be lovely, though considering the national security implications of the phenomena I doubt that what has been disclosed, or even recognized, is comprehensive.  We have a situation, unfortunately, where the available data (to, literally and figuratively, ground observers) is limited, there are relatively few opportunities to acquire more data, official treatment is disingenuous if not dis-informative, and opportunists pollute the disc... [More]
Comment icon #35 Posted by Trelane 2 months ago
In many of the more anomalous or unidentified cases, i think we are seeing unidentified natural phenomenon. That's just my opinion though. I certainly don't support that every single sighting is a drone or unknown piece of technology.    

Please Login or Register to post a comment.

Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News


Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon


For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Recent news and articles